12 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Jane Williams [8]Janet K. Williams [2]Jane H. Williams [2]Janet Williams [1]
Janet L. Williams [1]
See also
Janet Williams
University of Liverpool
  1.  17
    Prioritising Access to Pandemic Influenza Vaccine: A Review of the Ethics Literature. [REVIEW]Jane H. Williams & Angus Dawson - 2020 - BMC Medical Ethics 21 (1):1-8.
    BackgroundThe world is threatened by future pandemics. Vaccines can play a key role in preventing harm, but there will inevitably be shortages because there is no possibility of advance stockpiling. We therefore need some method of prioritising access.Main textThis paper reports a critical interpretative review of the published literature that discusses ethical arguments used to justify how we could prioritise vaccine during an influenza pandemic. We found that the focus of the literature was often on proposing different groups as priorities. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  27
    Parents’ Attitudes Toward Consent and Data Sharing in Biobanks: A Multisite Experimental Survey.Armand H. Matheny Antommaria, Kyle B. Brothers, John A. Myers, Yana B. Feygin, Sharon A. Aufox, Murray H. Brilliant, Pat Conway, Stephanie M. Fullerton, Nanibaa’ A. Garrison, Carol R. Horowitz, Gail P. Jarvik, Rongling Li, Evette J. Ludman, Catherine A. McCarty, Jennifer B. McCormick, Nathaniel D. Mercaldo, Melanie F. Myers, Saskia C. Sanderson, Martha J. Shrubsole, Jonathan S. Schildcrout, Janet L. Williams, Maureen E. Smith, Ellen Wright Clayton & Ingrid A. Holm - 2018 - Ajob Empirical Bioethics 9 (3):128-142.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3.  15
    Contested Guideline Development in Australia’s Cervical Screening Program: Values Drive Different Views of the Purpose and Implementation of Organized Screening.Jane Williams, Stacy Carter & Lucie Rychetnik - 2017 - Public Health Ethics 10 (1).
    This article draws on an empirical investigation of how Australia’s cervical screening program came to be the way it is. The study was carried out using grounded theory methodology and primarily uses interviews with experts involved in establishing, updating or administering the program. We found strong differences in experts’ normative evaluations of the program and beliefs about optimal ways of achieving the same basic outcome: a reduction in morbidity and mortality caused by invasive cervical cancer. Our analysis demonstrates how variations (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  4.  13
    Scientism, Conflicts of Interest, and the Marginalization of Ethics in Medical Education.Christopher Mayes, Jane Williams, Ian Kerridge & Wendy Lipworth - 2018 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 24 (5):939-944.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5. Individual Genetic and Genomic Research Results and the Tradition of Informed Consent: Exploring US Review Board Guidance.Christian Simon, Laura A. Shinkunas, Debra Brandt & Janet K. Williams - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (7):417-422.
    Background Genomic research is challenging the tradition of informed consent. Genomic researchers in the USA, Canada and parts of Europe are encouraged to use informed consent to address the prospect of disclosing individual research results (IRRs) to study participants. In the USA, no national policy exists to direct this use of informed consent, and it is unclear how local institutional review boards (IRBs) may want researchers to respond. Objective and methods To explore publicly accessible IRB websites for guidance in this (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  3
    Its the Most Ethical Job I Have Ever Had: Complaint Handling and Fair Decision Making in the Financial Industry.Gavin McBurnie, Christian Gill & Jane Williams - 2021 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1 (1):1.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  35
    A New Scale to Measure Family Members' Perception of Community Health Care Services for Persons with Huntington Disease.Valmi D. Sousa, Janet K. Williams, Jack J. Barnette & David A. Reed - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (3):470-475.
  8.  13
    An Empirical Study of the ‘Underscreened’ in Organised Cervical Screening: Experts Focus on Increasing Opportunity as a Way of Reducing Differences in Screening Rates.Jane H. Williams & Stacy M. Carter - 2016 - BMC Medical Ethics 17 (1):56.
    BackgroundCervical cancer disproportionately burdens disadvantaged women. Organised cervical screening aims to make cancer prevention available to all women in a population, yet screening uptake and cancer incidence and mortality are strongly correlated with socioeconomic status. Reaching underscreened populations is a stated priority in many screening programs, usually with an emphasis on something like ‘equity’. Equity is a poorly defined and understood concept. We aimed to explain experts’ perspectives on how cervical screening programs might justifiably respond to ‘the underscreened’.MethodsThis paper reports (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. Book Review. [REVIEW]Jane Williams - 1998 - Ethics and Behavior 8 (1):85 – 87.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Contested Guideline Development in Australia’s Cervical Screening Program: Values Drive Different Views of the Purpose and Implementation of Organized Screening: Table 1.Jane Williams, Stacy Carter & Lucie Rychetnik - 2016 - Public Health Ethics:phw030.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  7
    Critical Study.Jane Williams - 1988 - Modern Theology 4 (3):282-287.
  12.  9
    Textbook of Healthcare Ethics (Book).Jane Williams - 1998 - Ethics and Behavior 8 (1):85 – 87.