Order:
Disambiguations
Jari I. Niemi [4]Jari Niemi [2]Jari Ilmari Niemi [2]
See also
  1.  41
    The Foundations of Jürgen Habermas’s Discourse Ethics.Jari Ilmari Niemi - 2008 - Journal of Value Inquiry 42 (2):255-268.
  2.  21
    Do Arguments Against Self-Ownership Imply Anything Regarding the Equalisandum Debate?Jari Niemi - 2010 - Social Philosophy Today 26:67-81.
    In this paper I pursue a possibility that some versions of arguments addressed against the libertarian notion of self-ownership have some definitive implications regarding the equalisandum debate carried out by egalitarians. I have in mind specifically the kind of approach that challenges self-ownership as a morally fundamental value through some inventive counterexamples. So, while I shall argue that the negative arguments against self-ownership are conclusive, my primary attempt is to demonstrate that such arguments can be employed to say something interesting (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  10
    Do Arguments Against Self-Ownership Imply Anything Regarding the Equalisandum Debate?Jari Niemi - 2010 - Social Philosophy Today 26:67-81.
    In this paper I pursue a possibility that some versions of arguments addressed against the libertarian notion of self-ownership have some definitive implications regarding the equalisandum debate carried out by egalitarians. I have in mind specifically the kind of approach that challenges self-ownership as a morally fundamental value through some inventive counterexamples. So, while I shall argue that the negative arguments against self-ownership are conclusive, my primary attempt is to demonstrate that such arguments can be employed to say something interesting (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  32
    Habermas and Validity Claims.Jari I. Niemi - 2005 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (2):227 – 244.
    At the heart of Jürgen Habermas's explication of communicative rationality is the contention that all speech acts oriented to understanding raise three different kinds of validity claims simultaneously: claims to truth, truthfulness, and normative rightness. This paper argues that Habermas presents exactly three distinct, logically independent arguments for his simultaneity thesis: an argument from structure; an argument from criticizability/rejectability; and an argument from understanding/reaching understanding. It is further maintained that the simultaneity thesis receives cogent support only from the Argument from (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  35
    Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Rationality: The Foundational Distinction Between Communicative and Strategic Action.Jari I. Niemi - 2005 - Social Theory and Practice 31 (4):513-532.
  6.  19
    Review of “Michel Foucault”. [REVIEW]Jari I. Niemi - 2004 - Essays in Philosophy 5 (1):29.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  1
    Review of Michel Foucault, by Barry Smart. [REVIEW]Jari I. Niemi - 2004 - Essays in Philosophy 5 (1):205-208.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark