11 found
Order:
See also
Jason Decker
Carleton College
  1. Moral Testimony: One of These Things Is Just Like the Others.Daniel Groll & Jason Decker - 2014 - Analytic Philosophy 55 (1):54-74.
    What, if anything, is wrong with acquiring moral beliefs on the basis of testimony? Most philosophers think that there is something wrong with it, and most point to a special problem that moral testimony is supposed to create for moral agency. Being a good moral agent involves more than bringing about the right outcomes. It also involves acting with "moral understanding" and one cannot have moral understanding of what one is doing via moral testimony. And so, adherents to this view (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  2. Disagreement, Evidence, and Agnosticism.Jason Decker - 2012 - Synthese 187 (2):753-783.
    In this paper, I respond to recent attempts by philosophers to deny the existence of something that is both real and significant: reasonable disagreements between epistemic peers. In their arguments against the possibility of such disagreements, skeptical philosophers typically invoke one or more of the following: indifference reasoning , equal weight principles , and uniqueness theses . I take up each of these in turn, finding ample reason to resist them. The arguments for indifference reasoning and equal weight principles tend (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  3. The (In)Significance of Moral Disagreement for Moral Knowledge.Jason Decker & Daniel Groll - 2013 - In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 8. Oxford University Press.
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  82
    Conciliation and Self-Incrimination.Jason Decker - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (5):1099-1134.
    Conciliationism is a view—well, a family of views—in the epistemology of disagreement. The idea, simply put, is that, in a wide range of cases where you find yourself in disagreement with another reasoner about the truth of some proposition, you are rationally obliged to adjust your credence in the direction of hers. Conciliationism enjoys a fair bit of prima facie plausibility. Most versions of it, however, suffer from a common (and rather obvious) problem: self-incrimination. Although there is some recognition in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  23
    Philosophy of Language: The Classics Explained, by Colin McGinn. [REVIEW]Jason Decker - 2015 - Teaching Philosophy 38 (4):463-469.
  6.  54
    On Keeping Logic in the Major.Jason Decker - 2010 - Teaching Philosophy 33 (2):133-142.
    A course in symbolic logic belongs as a requirement in the undergraduate philosophy major. In this paper, which started life as a letter to my departmental colleagues, I consider and respond to several reasons one might have for excluding Logic from the core requirements. I then give several arguments in favor of keeping Logic. The central—and most important—argument is that the lack of a proper background in logic makes it very difficult to approach many relatively straightforward philosophical arguments, let alone (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  53
    When Should Philosophers Be Silent?Jason Decker & Charles Taliaferro - 2012 - Philosophy 87 (2):163-187.
    Are there general precepts governing when philosophers should not conduct inquiry on a given topic? When, if ever, should a philosopher just be silent? In this paper we look at a number of practical, epistemic, and moral arguments for philosophical silence. Some are quite general, and suggest that it is best never to engage in philosophical inquiry, while others are more domain - or context - specific. We argue that these arguments fail to establish their conclusions. We do, however, try (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  52
    Philosophy of Language.Jason Decker - 2010 - Teaching Philosophy 33 (4):411-415.
  9.  29
    Honor For Us: A Philosophical Analysis, Interpretation and Defense, by William Lad Sessions. [REVIEW]Jason Decker - 2014 - Faith and Philosophy 31 (1):117-122.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  1
    Philosophy of Language: A Contemporary Introduction. [REVIEW]Jason Decker - 2010 - Teaching Philosophy 33 (4):411-415.
  11.  1
    On Keeping Logic in the Major.Jason Decker - 2011 - Teaching Philosophy 34 (2):133-142.
    A course in symbolic logic belongs as a requirement in the undergraduate philosophy major. In this paper, which started life as a letter to my departmental colleagues, I consider and respond to several reasons one might have for excluding Logic from the core requirements. I then give several arguments in favor of keeping Logic. The central—and most important—argument is that the lack of a proper background in logic makes it very difficult to approach many relatively straightforward philosophical arguments, let alone (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark