Results for 'Jean Bart Verheij'

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  1
    Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C.W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H.M. Wagemans . Handbook of Argumentation Theory. [REVIEW]Sara Rubinelli - 2016 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 5 (3):353-358.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  11
    Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C.W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij and Jean H.M. Wagemans: Handbook of Argumentation Theory. [REVIEW]Ton Haaften - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (3):345-351.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  29
    Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C.W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij and Jean H.M. Wagemans: Handbook of Argumentation Theory: Springer, Dordrecht, 2014, ISBN: 978-90-481-9472-8 , ISBN: 978-90-481-9473-5 , ISBN: 978-90-481-9474-2. [REVIEW]Ton van Haaften - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (3):345-351.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  16
    Handbook of Argumentation Theory.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  5.  60
    David Hitchcock and Bart Verheij (eds): Arguing on the Toulmin Model. New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation. [REVIEW]Lester C. van der Pluijm & Jacky C. Visser - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (4):527-539.
    David Hitchcock and Bart Verheij (eds): Arguing on the Toulmin Model. New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-13 DOI 10.1007/s10503-011-9214-y Authors Lester C. van der Pluijm, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Jacky C. Visser, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Journal Argumentation Online ISSN 1572-8374 Print ISSN 0920-427X.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. David Hitchcock and Bart Verheij (eds): Arguing on the Toulmin Model. New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation: Springer, Dordrecht, 2006, vii + 439 pp. [REVIEW]Lester C. van der Pluijm & Jacky C. Visser - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (4):527-539.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  4
    From Stories—via Arguments, Scenarios, and Cases—to Probabilities: Commentary on Floris J. Bex's “The Hybrid Theory of Stories and Arguments Applied to the Simonshaven Case” and Bart Verheij's “Analyzing the Simonshaven Case With and Without Probabilities”.Frank Zenker - 2020 - Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (4):1219-1223.
  8.  36
    Hendrik Kaptein, Henry Prakken and Bart verheij (eds): Review of legal evidence and proof: Statistics, stories, logic. [REVIEW]Douglas Walton - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (4):371-377.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  6
    Hendrik Kaptein, Henry Prakken and Bart Verheij (eds): Review of legal evidence and proof: statistics, stories, logic: Farnham, Ashgate, Applied Legal Philosophy Series, 2009, 288 pp. [REVIEW]Douglas Walton - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (4):371-377.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  2
    Review of The dynamics of judicial proof, computation, logic, and common sense, by M. MacCrimmon and P. Tillers (eds.), Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2002. [REVIEW]Bart Reviewer-Verheij - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (4):299-303.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  90
    Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: An approach to legal logic. [REVIEW]Bart Verheij - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):167-195.
    This paper describes an approach to legal logic based on the formal analysis of argumentation schemes. Argumentation schemes a notion borrowed from the .eld of argumentation theory - are a kind of generalized rules of inference, in the sense that they express that given certain premises a particular conclusion can be drawn. However, argumentation schemes need not concern strict, abstract, necessarily valid patterns of reasoning, but can be defeasible, concrete and contingently valid, i.e., valid in certain contexts or under certain (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   62 citations  
  12.  42
    Proof with and without probabilities: Correct evidential reasoning with presumptive arguments, coherent hypotheses and degrees of uncertainty.Bart Verheij - 2017 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (1):127-154.
    Evidential reasoning is hard, and errors can lead to miscarriages of justice with serious consequences. Analytic methods for the correct handling of evidence come in different styles, typically focusing on one of three tools: arguments, scenarios or probabilities. Recent research used Bayesian networks for connecting arguments, scenarios, and probabilities. Well-known issues with Bayesian networks were encountered: More numbers are needed than are available, and there is a risk of misinterpretation of the graph underlying the Bayesian network, for instance as a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  13.  11
    Artificial intelligence as law. [REVIEW]Bart Verheij - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 28 (2):181-206.
    Information technology is so ubiquitous and AI’s progress so inspiring that also legal professionals experience its benefits and have high expectations. At the same time, the powers of AI have been rising so strongly that it is no longer obvious that AI applications (whether in the law or elsewhere) help promoting a good society; in fact they are sometimes harmful. Hence many argue that safeguards are needed for AI to be trustworthy, social, responsible, humane, ethical. In short: AI should be (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  14.  24
    Jumping to Conclusions.Bart Verheij - 2012 - In Luis Farinas del Cerro, Andreas Herzig & Jerome Mengin (eds.), Logics in Artificial Intelligence. Springer. pp. 411--423.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  15.  22
    On the existence of semi-stable extensions.Martin Caminada & Bart Verheij - unknown
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  16. Accepting the truth of a story about the facts of a criminal case.Bart Verheij & Floris Bex - 2008 - In Hendrik Kaptein (ed.), Legal Evidence and Proof: Statistics, Stories, Logic. Ashgate.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  17. Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Scheme.Bart Verheij - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):347-371.
    Toulmin’s scheme for the layout of arguments (1958, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) represents an influential tool for the analysis of arguments. The scheme enriches the traditional premises-conclusion model of arguments by distinguishing additional elements, like warrant, backing and rebuttal. The present paper contains a formal elaboration of Toulmin’s scheme, and extends it with a treatment of the formal evaluation of Toulmin-style arguments, which Toulmin did not discuss at all. Arguments are evaluated in terms of a so-called (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  18. Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation.Bart Verheij - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence 150 (1-2):291-324.
  19.  18
    Analyzing the Simonshaven Case With and Without Probabilities.Bart Verheij - 2020 - Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (4):1175-1199.
    This paper is one in a series of rational analyses of the Dutch Simonshaven case, each using a different theoretical perspective. The theoretical perspectives discussed in the literature typically use arguments, scenarios, and probabilities, in various combinations. The theoretical perspective on evidential reasoning used in this paper has been designed to connect arguments, scenarios, and probabilities in a single formal modeling approach, in an attempt to investigate bridges between qualitative and quantitative analytic styles. The theoretical perspective uses the recently proposed (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  20.  38
    An integrated view on rules and principles.Bart Verheij, Jaap C. Hage & H. Jaap Van Den Herik - 1998 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 6 (1):3-26.
    In the law, it is generally acknowledged that there are intuitive differences between reasoning with rules and reasoning with principles. For instance, a rule seems to lead directly to its conclusion if its condition is satisfied, while a principle seems to lead merely to a reason for its conclusion. However, the implications of these intuitive differences for the logical status of rules and principles remain controversial.A radical opinion has been put forward by Dworkin (1978). The intuitive differences led him to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  21. Reason-based Logic: A logic for reasoning with rules and reasons.Jaap Hage & Bart Verheij - 1994 - Inform. Commun. Technol. Law 3 (2-3):171-209.
  22. Arguments, rules and cases in law: Resources for aligning learning and reasoning in structured domains.Cor Steging, Silja Renooij, Bart Verheij & Trevor Bench-Capon - forthcoming - Argument and Computation:1-9.
    This paper provides a formal description of two legal domains. In addition, we describe the generation of various artificial datasets from these domains and explain the use of these datasets in previous experiments aligning learning and reasoning. These resources are made available for the further investigation of connections between arguments, cases and rules. The datasets are publicly available at https://github.com/CorSteging/LegalResources.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  34
    Henry Prakken (1997). Logical tools for modelling legal argument. A study of defeasible reasoning in law.Bart Verheij - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (1):35-65.
  24.  17
    Book review: The dynamics of judicial proof. Computation, logic, and common sense. [REVIEW]Bart Verheij - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (4):299-303.
  25.  26
    Douglas Walton, the new dialectic. Conversational contexts of argument. Toronto: University of toronto press (book review). [REVIEW]Bart Verheij - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (4):305-313.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  26.  2
    Douglas Walton, The New Dialectic. Conversational Contexts of Argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press (Book Review). [REVIEW]Bart Verheij - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (4):305-313.
  27. Evidence & decision making in the law: theoretical, computational and empirical approaches.Marcello Di Bello & Bart Verheij - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 28 (1):1-5.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  28.  59
    Evidential Reasoning.Marcello Di Bello & Bart Verheij - 2011 - In G. Bongiovanni, G. Postema, A. Rotolo, G. Sartor, C. Valentini & D. Walton (eds.), Handbook in Legal Reasoning and Argumentation. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. pp. 447-493.
    The primary aim of this chapter is to explain the nature of evidential reasoning, the characteristic difficulties encountered, and the tools to address these difficulties. Our focus is on evidential reasoning in criminal cases. There is an extensive scholarly literature on these topics, and it is a secondary aim of the chapter to provide readers the means to find their way in historical and ongoing debates.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  29. Solving a Murder Case by Asking Critical Questions: An Approach to Fact-Finding in Terms of Argumentation and Story Schemes. [REVIEW]Floris Bex & Bart Verheij - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (3):325-353.
    In this paper, we look at reasoning with evidence and facts in criminal cases. We show how this reasoning may be analysed in a dialectical way by means of critical questions that point to typical sources of doubt. We discuss critical questions about the evidential arguments adduced, about the narrative accounts of the facts considered, and about the way in which the arguments and narratives are connected in an analysis. Our treatment shows how two different types of knowledge, represented as (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  30.  84
    The Toulmin Model Today: Introduction to the Special Issue on Contemporary Work using Stephen Edelston Toulmin’s Layout of Arguments.David Hitchcock & Bart Verheij - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):255-258.
  31. Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). [Amsterdam, July 3-6, 2018.].Bart J. Garssen, David Godden, Gordon Mitchell & Jean Wagemans (eds.) - 2019 - Sic Sat.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  53
    Legal stories and the process of proof.Floris Bex & Bart Verheij - 2013 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 21 (3):253-278.
    In this paper, we continue our research on a hybrid narrative-argumentative approach to evidential reasoning in the law by showing the interaction between factual reasoning (providing a proof for ‘what happened’ in a case) and legal reasoning (making a decision based on the proof). First we extend the hybrid theory by making the connection with reasoning towards legal consequences. We then emphasise the role of legal stories (as opposed to the factual stories of the hybrid theory). Legal stories provide a (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  33. Over het interessante: [vertoog en literatuur.Jean-François Lyotard & Bart Verschaffel (eds.) - 1993 - Antwerpen: E. Antonis.
  34.  7
    Douglas Neil Walton.Erik C. W. Krabbe & Bart Verheij - 2020 - Argumentation 35 (3):513-518.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  13
    On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games: 25 years later.Pietro Baroni, Francesca Toni & Bart Verheij - 2020 - Argument and Computation 11 (1-2):1-14.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  36. La revolution française ou pourquoi la guillotine?Jean Bart - 2012 - Corpus: Revue de philosophie 62:89-103.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  48
    Douglas Walton: Argument Evaluation and Evidence: Springer, 2016, 286 pp. [REVIEW]Marcello Di Bello & Bart Verheij - 2018 - Argumentation 32 (2):301-307.
  38.  5
    Medical research, Big Data and the need for privacy by design.Jean Popma & Bart Jacobs - 2019 - Big Data and Society 6 (1).
    Medical research data is sensitive personal data that needs to be protected from unauthorized access and unintentional disclosure. In a research setting, sharing of data within the scientific community is necessary in order to make progress and maximize scientific benefits derived from valuable and costly data. At the same time, convincingly protecting the privacy of people participating in medical research is a prerequisite for maintaining trust and willingness to share. In this commentary, we will address this issue and the pitfalls (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  39.  17
    Argument & Computation Community Resources corner.Pietro Baroni & Bart Verheij - 2019 - Argument and Computation 10 (2):105-105.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  11
    Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the first decade. [REVIEW]Guido Governatori, Trevor Bench-Capon, Bart Verheij, Michał Araszkiewicz, Enrico Francesconi & Matthias Grabmair - 2022 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 30 (4):481-519.
    The first issue of _Artificial Intelligence and Law_ journal was published in 1992. This paper provides commentaries on landmark papers from the first decade of that journal. The topics discussed include reasoning with cases, argumentation, normative reasoning, dialogue, representing legal knowledge and neural networks.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  41.  4
    Towards an inclusive, responsible and sustainable open access model.Pietro Baroni & Bart Verheij - 2022 - Argument and Computation 13 (1):1-2.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  2
    Argument & Computation: Change and continuity.Pietro Baroni & Bart Verheij - 2016 - Argument and Computation 7 (1):1-2.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  21
    Mathematical Practice and Naturalist Epistemology: Structures with Potential for Interaction.Bart Van Kerkhove & Jean Paul Van Bendegem - 2005 - Philosophia Scientae 9:61-78.
  44.  13
    Bookreviews.Bart J. Koet, P. C. Beentjes, Ton Meijers, Rudi te Velde, Henk J. M. Schoot, Marc Lindeijer, Walter Van Herck, Edwin Koster, Ruud Welten & Jean-Jacques Suurmond - 2007 - Bijdragen 68 (4):486-498.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45.  23
    Research in progress: report on the ICAIL 2017 doctoral consortium.Maria Dymitruk, Réka Markovich, Rūta Liepiņa, Mirna El Ghosh, Robert van Doesburg, Guido Governatori & Bart Verheij - 2018 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 26 (1):49-97.
    This paper arose out of the 2017 international conference on AI and law doctoral consortium. There were five students who presented their Ph.D. work, and each of them has contributed a section to this paper. The paper offers a view of what topics are currently engaging students, and shows the diversity of their interests and influences.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  46.  54
    A hybrid formal theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence.Floris J. Bex, Peter J. van Koppen, Henry Prakken & Bart Verheij - 2010 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (2):123-152.
    This paper presents a theory of reasoning with evidence in order to determine the facts in a criminal case. The focus is on the process of proof, in which the facts of the case are determined, rather than on related legal issues, such as the admissibility of evidence. In the literature, two approaches to reasoning with evidence can be distinguished, one argument-based and one story-based. In an argument-based approach to reasoning with evidence, the reasons for and against the occurrence of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  47.  3
    Introduction to the Special Issue Entitled ‘Mathematics: What Does it All Mean?’.Bart Kerkhove, Jean Bendegem & Sal Restivo - 2006 - Foundations of Science 11 (1-2):1-3.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  25
    Plato.Peter Jean Bart - 1927 - New Scholasticism 1 (3):267-272.
  49.  20
    Analecta Ordinis Carmelitarum, Extractum: Vol. VI. [REVIEW]Peter Jean Bart - 1927 - New Scholasticism 1 (4):354-356.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  1
    Mathematical Arguments in Context.Jean Bendegem & Bart Kerkhove - 2009 - Foundations of Science 14 (1-2):45-57.
    Except in very poor mathematical contexts, mathematical arguments do not stand in isolation of other mathematical arguments. Rather, they form trains of formal and informal arguments, adding up to interconnected theorems, theories and eventually entire fields. This paper critically comments on some common views on the relation between formal and informal mathematical arguments, most particularly applications of Toulmin’s argumentation model, and launches a number of alternative ideas of presentation inviting the contextualization of pieces of mathematical reasoning within encompassing bodies of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 1000