15 found
Jean Goodwin [30]Jean E. Goodwin [1]
  1.  89
    Argument Has No Function.Jean Goodwin - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (1):69-90.
    Douglas Walton has been right in calling us to attend to the pragmatics of argument. He has, however, also insisted that arguments should be understood and assessed by considering the functions they perform; and from this, I dissent. Argument has no determinable function in the sense Walton needs, and even if it did, that function would not ground norms for argumentative practice. As an alternative to a functional theory of argumentative pragmatics, I propose a design view, which draws attention to (...)
    Direct download (15 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   49 citations  
  2. Accounting for the Appeal to the Authority of Experts.Jean Goodwin - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (3):285-296.
    Work in Argumentation Studies (AS) and Studies in Expertise and Experience (SEE) has been proceeding on converging trajectories, moving from resistance to expert authority to a cautious acceptance of its legitimacy. The two projects are therefore also converging on the need to account for how, in the course of complex and confused civic deliberations, nonexpert citizens can figure out which statements from purported experts deserve their trust. Both projects recognize that nonexperts cannot assess expertise directly; instead, the nonexpert must judge (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  3.  48
    Forms of Authority and the Real Ad Verecundiam.Jean Goodwin - 1998 - Argumentation 12 (2):267-280.
    This paper provides a typology of appeals to authority, identifying three distinct types: that which is based on a command; that which is based on expertise; and that which is based on dignity. Each type is distinguished with respect to the reaction that a failure to follow it ordinarily evokes. The rhetorical roots of Locke's ad verecundiam are traced to the rhetorical practices of ancient Rome.
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  4.  21
    The Pragmatic Force of Making an Argument.Jean Goodwin & Beth Innocenti - 2019 - Topoi 38 (4):669-680.
    Making arguments makes reasons apparent. Sometimes those reasons may affect audiences’ relationships to claims. But an over-emphasis on audience effects encouraged by functionalist theories of argumentation distracts attention from other things that making arguments can accomplish. We advance the normative pragmatic program on argumentation through two case studies of how early advocates for women’s suffrage in the U.S. made reasons apparent in order to show that what they were doing wasn’t ridiculous. While it might be possible to identify this as (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  5.  14
    Should Climate Scientists Fly?Jean Goodwin - 2020 - Informal Logic 40 (2):157-203.
    I inquire into argument at the system level, exploring the controversy over whether climate scientists should fly. I document participants’ knowledge of a skeptical argument that because scientists fly, they cannot testify credibly about the climate emergency. I show how this argument has been managed by pro-climate action arguers, and how some climate scientists have developed parallel reasoning, articulating a sophisticated case why they will be more effective in the controversy if they fly less. Finally, I review some strategies arguers (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  6.  34
    Cicero's authority.Jean Goodwin - 1999 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 34 (1):38-60.
    In this paper I propose to continue the analysis of the appeal to authority begun at the last OSSA conference. I proceed by examining the well-documented use of the appeal made by the ancient Roman advocate, Cicero. The fact that Cicero expressed his opinion was expectably sufficient to give his auditors--responsible citizens all--reason to do as he desired. But why? The resolution of this puzzle points to a strong sense in which arguments can be called rhetorical , for the rational (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  7.  31
    Comments on `Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics'.Jean Goodwin - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (3):287-292.
  8.  11
    What does arguing look like?Jean Goodwin - 2005 - Informal Logic 25 (1):79-93.
  9.  48
    The Public Sphere and the Norms of Transactional Argument.Jean Goodwin - 2005 - Informal Logic 25 (2):151-165.
    An outsider to argument theory, should she look through the rich outpouring of our recent work, might be amused to find us theorists not following our own prescriptions. We propound our ideas, but we don't always interact with each other--we don't argue. The essays by William Rehg and Robert Asen make promising start on rectifying this difficulty. I want to discuss them, first, to show how they acknowledge in exemplary fashion a pair of challenges I think we should all be (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  10.  32
    Conceptions of Speech Acts in the Theory and Practice of Argumentation: A Case Study of a Debate About Advocating.Jean Goodwin - 2014 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 36 (1):79-98.
    Far from being of interest only to argumentation theorists, conceptions of speech acts play an important role in practitioners’ self-reflection on their own activities. After a brief review of work by Houtlosser, Jackson and Kauffeld on the ways that speech acts provide normative frameworks for argumentative interactions, this essay examines an ongoing debate among scientists in natural resource fields as to the appropriateness of the speech act of advocating in policy settings. Scientists’ reflections on advocacy align well with current scholarship, (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  11.  56
    Wigmore's Chart Method.Jean Goodwin & Alec Fisher - 2000 - Informal Logic 20 (3).
    A generation before Beardsley, legal scholar John Henry Wigmore invented a scheme for representing arguments in a tree diagram, aimed to help advocates analyze the proof of facts at trial. In this essay, I describe Wigmore's "Chart Method" and trace its origin and influence. Wigmore, I argue, contributes to contemporary theory in two ways. His rhetorical approach to diagramming provides a novel perspective on problems about the theory of reasoning, premise adequacy, and dialectical obligations. Further, he advances a novel solution (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  12.  27
    Citizen Science Ethics: It’s a Community Thing.Jean Goodwin & Laura Roberts - 2019 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 9 (1):35-40.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
  13. Henry Johnstone, Jr.'s Still-Unacknowledged Contributions to Contemporary Argumentation Theory.Jean Goodwin - 2001 - Informal Logic 21 (1).
    Given the pragmatic tum recently taken by argumentation studies, we owe renewed attention to Henry Johnstone's views on the primacy of process over product. In particular, Johnstone's decidedly non-cooperative model is a refreshing alternative to the current dialogic theories of arguing, one which opens the way for specifically rhetorical lines of inquiry.
    Direct download (13 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  14.  34
    Theoretical pieties, Johnstone's impiety, and ordinary views of argumentation.Jean Goodwin - 2007 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 40 (1):36-50.
  15. Walter Lippmann, the indispensable opposition.Jean Goodwin - 2014 - In Brian Jackson & Gregory Clark (eds.), Trained capacities: John Dewey, rhetoric, and democratic practice. Columbia, South Carolina: The University of South Carolina Press.
    Export citation