6 found
  1.  12
    Jeannerod's Representing Brain: Image or Illusion?Jean Pailhous & Mireille Bonnard - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (2):215-216.
  2.  47
    Thermodynamic Study of Motor Behaviour Optimization.Patrick Cordier, Michel Mendès France, Philippe Bolon & Jean Pailhous - 1994 - Acta Biotheoretica 42 (2-3):187-201.
    Our work is aimed at studying the optimization of a complex motor behaviour from a global perspective. First, free climbing as a sport will be briefly introduced while emphasizing in particular its psychomotor aspect called route finding. The basic question raised here is how does the optimization of a sensorimotoricity-environment system take place. The material under study is the free climber's trajectory, viewed as the signature of climbing behaviour (i.e., the spatial dimension). The concepts of learning, optimization, constraint, and degrees (...)
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3.  21
    What Spaces? What Subjects?Jean Pailhous & Patrick Peruch - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (4):646-647.
  4.  13
    Is the Brain Specified?Jean Pailhous, Elodie Varraine & Mireille Bonnard - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2):233-234.
    How to conceive the place of the brain in the specification of the animal environment relation? Reality is a continuum between external physical energies and brain energy. The global array concept linked to the physical world and its physical energies could be transposed to the brain as a physical object and a dynamical system.
    Direct download (6 more)  
    Export citation  
  5. Locomotion, Oscillating Dynamic Systems and Stiffness Regulation by the Basal Ganglia.Guillaume Masson & Jean Pailhous - 1992 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (4):778-779.
    No categories
    Export citation  
  6.  7
    A Few Reasons Why Psychologlsts Can Adhere to Feldman and Levin's Model.Mireille Bonnard & Jean Pailhous - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):746-747.
    We emphasize the relevance to cognitive psychology of Feldman and Levin's theoretical position. Traditional views of motor control have failed to clearly separate “production control” at the level of motor command, based on task-independent CV, from intentional “product control” based on task-dependent parameters. Because F&L's approach concentrates on the first process, it can distinguish the product control stage.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation