Results for 'Jeffrey Shallit'

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Information Theory, Evolutionary Computation, and Dembski’s “Complex Specified Information”.Wesley Elsberry & Jeffrey Shallit - 2011 - Synthese 178 (2):237 - 270.
    Intelligent design advocate William Dembski has introduced a measure of information called "complex specified information", or CSI. He claims that CSI is a reliable marker of design by intelligent agents. He puts forth a "Law of Conservation of Information" which states that chance and natural laws are incapable of generating CSI. In particular, CSI cannot be generated by evolutionary computation. Dembski asserts that CSI is present in intelligent causes and in the flagellum of Escherichia coli, and concludes that neither have (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  2.  14
    Information Theory, Evolutionary Computation, and Dembski’s “Complex Specified Information”.Wesley Elsberry & Jeffrey Shallit - 2011 - Synthese 178 (2):237-270.
  3.  26
    David Miller. A Paradox of Information. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 17 No. 1 , Pp. 59–61. - Karl R. Popper. A Comment on Miller's New Paradox of Information. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 17 No. 1 , Pp. 61–69. - Karl R. Popper. A Paradox of Zero Information. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 17 No. 2, Pp. 141–143. - J. L. Mackie. Miller's so-Called Paradox of Information.The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 17 No. 2, Pp. 144–147. - David Miller. On a so-Called so-Called Paradox: A Reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 17 No. 2, Pp. 147–149. - Jeffrey Bub and Michael Radner. Miller's Paradox of Information.The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 19 No. 1 , Pp. 63–67. - David Miller. The Straight and Narrow Rule of Induction: A Reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner.The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 19 No. 2, Pp. 145. [REVIEW]Richard C. Jeffrey - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):124-127.
  4. Probability, Dynamics, and Causality Essays in Honour of Richard C. Jeffrey.Domenico Costantini, Maria Carla Galavotti & Richard C. Jeffrey - 1997
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  8
    Jeffrey Shallit and Ming-Wei Wang. Automatic Complexity of Strings. Journal of Automata, Languages and Combinatorics, Vol. 6 , Pp. 537–554. - Cristian S. Calude, Kai Salomaa and Tania K. Roblot. Finite-State Complexity and Randomness. Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. 412 , No. 41, Pp. 5668–5677. - Cristian S. Calude, Kai Salomaa and Tania K. Roblot. State-Size Hierarchy for Finite-State Complexity. International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science, Vol. 23 , No. 1, Pp. 37–50. [REVIEW]Mia Minnes - 2012 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 18 (4):579-580.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. Probability and the Art of Judgment.Richard Jeffrey - 1992 - Cambridge University Press.
    Richard Jeffrey is beyond dispute one of the most distinguished and influential philosophers working in the field of decision theory and the theory of knowledge. His work is distinctive in showing the interplay of epistemological concerns with probability and utility theory. Not only has he made use of standard probabilistic and decision theoretic tools to clarify concepts of evidential support and informed choice, he has also proposed significant modifications of the standard Bayesian position in order that it provide a (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   71 citations  
  7. Formal Logic: Its Scope and Limits.Richard C. Jeffrey - 1967 - Hackett.
    This brief paperback is designed for symbolic/formal logic courses. It features the tree method proof system developed by Jeffrey. The new edition contains many more examples and exercises and is reorganized for greater accessibility.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  8. Preference Among Preferences.Richard C. Jeffrey - 1974 - Journal of Philosophy 71 (13):377-391.
  9.  96
    Valuation and Acceptance of Scientific Hypotheses.Richard C. Jeffrey - 1956 - Philosophy of Science 23 (3):237-246.
  10. Logicism Lite.Richard Jeffrey - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (3):474-496.
    Logicism Lite counts number‐theoretical laws as logical for the same sort of reason for which physical laws are counted as as empirical: because of the character of the data they are responsible to. In the case of number theory these are the data verifying or falsifying the simplest equations, which Logicism Lite counts as true or false depending on the logical validity or invalidity of first‐order argument forms in which no numbertheoretical notation appears.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  11.  59
    Indefinite Probability Judgment: A Reply to Levi.Richard Jeffrey - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (4):586-591.
    Isaac Levi and I have different views of probability and decision making. Here, without addressing the merits, I will try to answer some questions recently asked by Levi (1985) about what my view is, and how it relates to his.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  12. Goodman's Query.Richard C. Jeffrey - 1966 - Journal of Philosophy 63 (11):281-288.
  13.  40
    Radical Probabilism (Prospectus for a User's Manual).Richard Jeffrey - 1992 - Philosophical Issues 2:193-204.
  14.  57
    On Interpersonal Utility Theory.Richard C. Jeffrey - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (20):647-656.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  15.  37
    Ethics and the Logic of Decision.Richard C. Jeffrey - 1965 - Journal of Philosophy 62 (19):528-539.
  16.  33
    Take Back the Day! Jon Dorling's Bayesian Solution of the Duhem Problem.Richard Jeffrey - 1993 - Philosophical Issues 3:197-207.
  17.  32
    Popper on the Rule of Succession.Richard C. Jeffrey - 1964 - Mind 73 (289):129.
  18.  21
    A Note on Finch's "an Explication of Counterfactuals by Probability Theory".Richard C. Jeffrey - 1959 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 20 (1):116.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  15
    Confirmation Based on Analogical Inference: Bayes Meets Jeffrey.Christian J. Feldbacher-Escamilla & Alexander Gebharter - forthcoming - Canadian Journal of Philosophy.
    Certain hypotheses cannot be directly confirmed for theoretical, practical, or moral reasons. For some of these hypotheses, however, there might be a workaround: confirmation based on analogical reasoning. In this paper we take up Dardashti, Hartmann, Thébault, and Winsberg’s (in press) idea of analyzing confirmation based on analogical inference Baysian style. We identify three types of confirmation by analogy and show that Dardashti et al.’s approach can cover two of them. We then highlight possible problems with their model as a (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  20. Belief Revision Generalized: A Joint Characterization of Bayes's and Jeffrey's Rules.Franz Dietrich, Christian List & Richard Bradley - 2016 - Journal of Economic Theory 162:352-371.
    We present a general framework for representing belief-revision rules and use it to characterize Bayes's rule as a classical example and Jeffrey's rule as a non-classical one. In Jeffrey's rule, the input to a belief revision is not simply the information that some event has occurred, as in Bayes's rule, but a new assignment of probabilities to some events. Despite their differences, Bayes's and Jeffrey's rules can be characterized in terms of the same axioms: "responsiveness", which requires (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  21. Jeffrey Conditionalization, the Principal Principle, the Desire as Belief Thesis, and Adams's Thesis.Ittay Nissan-Rozen - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (4):axs039.
    I show that David Lewis’s principal principle is not preserved under Jeffrey conditionalization. Using this observation, I argue that Lewis’s reason for rejecting the desire as belief thesis and Adams’s thesis applies also to his own principal principle. 1 Introduction2 Adams’s Thesis, the Desire as Belief Thesis, and the Principal Principle3 Jeffrey Conditionalization4 The Principal Principles Not Preserved under Jeffrey Conditionalization5 Inadmissible Experiences.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  22.  78
    What's Wrong with "What's Wrong with Libertarianism": A Reply to Jeffrey Friedman.J. C. Lester - 2016 - In Arguments for Liberty: A Libertarian Miscellany. pp. 95-101.
    This essay explains Jeffrey Friedman's two fundamental and persistent philosophical errors concerning the libertarian conception of liberty and the lack of a "justification‟ of libertarianism. It is ironic that Friedman himself is thereby revealed to be guilty of both an “a priori” anti-libertarianism and an anti-libertarian “straddle.” Critical-rationalist, proactive-imposition-minimising libertarianism remains completely unchallenged by him.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  43
    Aquinas’s Ontology of the Material World: Change, Hylomorphism, and Material Objects. By Jeffrey E. Brower. [REVIEW]Timothy Pawl - 2015 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 89 (4):723-727.
    I review Jeffrey Brower's book, "Aquinas's Ontology of the Material World".
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  44
    Simultaneous Belief Updates Via Successive Jeffrey Conditionalization.Ilho Park - 2013 - Synthese 190 (16):3511-3533.
    This paper discusses simultaneous belief updates. I argue here that modeling such belief updates using the Principle of Minimum Information can be regarded as applying Jeffrey conditionalization successively, and so that, contrary to what many probabilists have thought, the simultaneous belief updates can be successfully modeled by means of Jeffrey conditionalization.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  40
    Jeffrey Conditioning, Rigidity, and the Defeasible Red Jelly Bean.Lydia McGrew - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (2):569-582.
    Jonathan Weisberg has argued that Jeffrey Conditioning is inherently “anti-holistic” By this he means, inter alia, that JC does not allow us to take proper account of after-the-fact defeaters for our beliefs. His central example concerns the discovery that the lighting in a room is red-tinted and the relationship of that discovery to the belief that a jelly bean in the room is red. Weisberg’s argument that the rigidity required for JC blocks the defeating role of the red-tinted light (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  34
    Explicating Formal Epistemology: Carnap's Legacy as Jeffrey's Radical Probabilism.Christopher F. French - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 53:33–42.
  27.  25
    Nietzsche, Nihilism, and the Philosophy of the Future Ed. By Jeffrey Metzger (Review).Jeffrey Church - 2013 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 44 (3):495-497.
    In his introduction, Jeffrey Metzger states that “at some point in the past 20 or 30 years … Nietzsche’s name [became] no longer associated primarily with nihilism” (1). Metzger is pointing to the increasing contemporary scholarly interest in Nietzsche’s epistemology, naturalism, and metaethics. The worthy aim of this volume is to ask us to examine once again the underlying philosophical problem to which these views are a response, namely, nihilism. This volume helpfully reminds us that Nietzsche’s philosophical motivation still (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  25
    On the Modal Logic of Jeffrey Conditionalization.Zalán Gyenis - 2018 - Logica Universalis 12 (3-4):351-374.
    We continue the investigations initiated in the recent papers where Bayes logics have been introduced to study the general laws of Bayesian belief revision. In Bayesian belief revision a Bayesian agent revises his prior belief by conditionalizing the prior on some evidence using the Bayes rule. In this paper we take the more general Jeffrey formula as a conditioning device and study the corresponding modal logics that we call Jeffrey logics, focusing mainly on the countable case. The containment (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  29. A Note on Jeffrey Conditionalization.Hartry Field - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (3):361-367.
    Bayesian decision theory can be viewed as the core of psychological theory for idealized agents. To get a complete psychological theory for such agents, you have to supplement it with input and output laws. On a Bayesian theory that employs strict conditionalization, the input laws are easy to give. On a Bayesian theory that employs Jeffrey conditionalization, there appears to be a considerable problem with giving the input laws. However, Jeffrey conditionalization can be reformulated so that the problem (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   56 citations  
  30.  55
    A Causal Understanding of When and When Not to Jeffrey Conditionalize.Ben Schwan & Reuben Stern - 2017 - Philosophers' Imprint 17.
    There are cases of ineffable learning — i. e., cases where an agent learns something, but becomes certain of nothing that she can express — where it is rational to update by Jeffrey conditionalization. But there are likewise cases of ineffable learning where updating by Jeffrey conditionalization is irrational. In this paper, we first characterize a novel class of cases where it is irrational to update by Jeffrey conditionalization. Then we use the d-separation criterion to develop a (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  31. From Bayesianism to the Epistemic View of Mathematics: Review of R. Jeffrey, Subjective Probability: The Real Thing[REVIEW]Jon Williamson - 2006 - Philosophia Mathematica 14 (3):365-369.
    Subjective Probability: The Real Thing is the last book written by the late Richard Jeffrey, a key proponent of the Bayesian interpretation of probability.Bayesians hold that probability is a mental notion: saying that the probability of rain is 0.7 is just saying that you believe it will rain to degree 0.7. Degrees of belief are themselves cashed out in terms of bets—in this case you consider 7:3 to be fair odds for a bet on rain. There are two extreme (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  22
    The Ethical and Academic Implications of the Jeffrey Beall Blog Shutdown.Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva - forthcoming - Science and Engineering Ethics:1-3.
    A very important event took place on January 15, 2017. On that day, the Jeffrey Beall blog was silently, and suddenly, shut down by Beall himself. A profoundly divisive and controversial site, the Beall blog represented an existential threat to those journals and publishers that were listed there. On the other hand, the Beall blog was a ray of hope to critics of bad publishing practices that a culture of public shaming was perhaps the only way to rout out (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  33.  38
    Categorical Induction From Uncertain Premises: Jeffrey's Doesn't Completely Rule.Constantinos Hadjichristidis, Steven A. Sloman & David E. Over - 2014 - Thinking and Reasoning 20 (4):405-431.
    Studies of categorical induction typically examine how belief in a premise (e.g., Falcons have an ulnar artery) projects on to a conclusion (e.g., Robins have an ulnar artery). We study induction in cases in which the premise is uncertain (e.g., There is an 80% chance that falcons have an ulnar artery). Jeffrey's rule is a normative model for updating beliefs in the face of uncertain evidence. In three studies we tested the descriptive validity of Jeffrey's rule and a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  34.  51
    Jeffrey Conditioning and External Bayesianity.Carl Wagner - 2010 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 18 (2):336-345.
    Suppose that several individuals who have separately assessed prior probability distributions over a set of possible states of the world wish to pool their individual distributions into a single group distribution, while taking into account jointly perceived new evidence. They have the option of first updating their individual priors and then pooling the resulting posteriors or first pooling their priors and then updating the resulting group prior. If the pooling method that they employ is such that they arrive at the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  35.  32
    Uncertain Premises and Jeffrey's Rule.David E. Over & Constantinos Hadjichristidis - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):97-98.
    Oaksford & Chater (O&C) begin in the halfway Bayesian house of assuming that minor premises in conditional inferences are certain. We demonstrate that this assumption is a serious limitation. They additionally suggest that appealing to Jeffrey's rule could make their approach more general. We present evidence that this rule is not limited enough to account for actual probability judgements.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  36.  9
    Reframing the Intercultural Dialogue on Human Rights: A Philosophical Approach by Jeffrey Flynn.Loubna El Amine - 2017 - Philosophy East and West 68 (1):301-303.
    Can we respond to the charge that human rights are a Western product without relinquishing human rights altogether? Can we be sensitive not only to the dominant voices in the non-Western world but also to the "margins of the margins"? Can the academic discussion on human rights be more attuned not only to scholarly arguments but also to "human rights activism and struggles for human rights"? Can it also be attuned to the fact of the new "globalizing modernity"? In Reframing (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  37.  46
    Order Dependence and Jeffrey Conditionalization.Daniel Osherson - manuscript
    A glance at the sky raises my probability of rain to .7. As it happens, the conditional probabilities of each state given rain remain the same, and similarly for their conditional probabilities given no rain. As Jeffrey (1983, Ch. 11) points out, my new distribution P2 is therefore fixed by the law of total probability. For example, P2(RC) = P2(RC | R)P2(R)+P2(RC | ¯.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  38.  67
    Jeffrey's Rule of Conditioning.Glenn Shafer - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (3):337-362.
    Richard Jeffrey's generalization of Bayes' rule of conditioning follows, within the theory of belief functions, from Dempster's rule of combination and the rule of minimal extension. Both Jeffrey's rule and the theory of belief functions can and should be construed constructively, rather than normatively or descriptively. The theory of belief functions gives a more thorough analysis of how beliefs might be constructed than Jeffrey's rule does. The inadequacy of Bayesian conditioning is much more general than Jeffrey's (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  39.  10
    Aquinas’s Ontology of the Material World: Change, Hylomorphism, and Material Objects, by Jeffrey E. Brower. Pp. Xxii, 327, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2014. $74.00. [REVIEW]Jeffrey Froula - 2019 - Heythrop Journal 60 (1):122-122.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  10
    Let Us Build Better Boats. An Answer to Jeffrey Seeman's "Moving Beyond Insularity in the History, Philosophy, and Sociology of Chemistry".Sebastian Fortin, Olimpia Lombardi & Juan Camilo Martínez - 2018 - Foundations of Chemistry 2 (3):261-264.
    In his recent Editorial Article, Jeffrey Seeman calls for the promotion of collaborative work among different disciplines, focusing on the case of the interaction between chemistry, the history of chemistry and the philosophy of chemistry. From a general viewpoint, it is difficult to disagree with this claim; moreover, the interest of scientists in the history and the philosophy of science is always welcome. However, the devil is in the details: there are several points that, we think, must be discussed (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  13
    A Review Of Jeffrey Gray’s Consciousness: Creeping Up On The Hard Problem. [REVIEW]Stephen Biggs - 2005 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 11.
    Jeffrey Gray’s Consciousness: Creeping up on the Hard Problem will be enjoyed by everyone interested in consciousness. Gray, a neuropsychologist, eloquently summarizes significant experimental results on consciousness and, more importantly, explains both how these results interrelate and how they constrain potential theories of consciousness. He also uses these results to build a novel, fascinating theory of what consciousness does and does not do. Throughout the work Gray’s accessible presentation remains deeply respectful of psychologists, neuroscientists, and philosophers’ approaches to consciousness. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  42.  53
    Jeffrey Stout on Democracy and its Contemporary Christian Critics.Nicholas Wolterstorff - 2005 - Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (4):633-647.
    Jeffrey Stout addresses two of the main criticisms of liberal democracy by its contemporary neotraditionalist Christian critics: that liberal democracy is destructive of social tradition, and thereby of virtue in the citizenry, and that liberal democracy is inherently secular, committed to expunging religious voices from the public arena. I judge that Stout effectively answers these charges: liberal democracy has its own tradition, it cultivates the virtues relevant to that, and it is not inherently hostile to piety. What Stout does (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  43.  17
    Credence for Conclusions: A Brief for Jeffrey’s Rule.John R. Welch - forthcoming - Synthese:1-22.
    Some arguments are good; others are not. How can we tell the difference? This article advances three proposals as a partial answer to this question. The proposals are keyed to arguments conditioned by different degrees of uncertainty: mild, where the argument’s premises are hedged with point-valued probabilities; moderate, where the premises are hedged with interval probabilities; and severe, where the premises are hedged with non-numeric plausibilities such as ‘very likely’ or ‘unconfirmed’. For mild uncertainty, the article proposes to apply a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  43
    The Geometry of Opinion: Jeffrey Shifts and Linear Operators.Bas C. Van Fraassen - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (2):163-175.
    Richard Jeffrey and Michael Goldstein have both introduced systematic approaches to the structure of opinion changes. For both approaches there are theorems which indicate great generality and width of scope. The main questions addressed here will be to what extent the basic forms of representation are intertranslatable, and how we can conceive of such programs in general.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45.  68
    Jeffrey Masson and Freud's Seduction Theory: A New Fable Based on Old Myths.Allen Esterson - 1998 - History of the Human Sciences 11 (1):1-21.
    Jeffrey Masson's version of the seduction theory episode in Freud's early career, as presented in The Assault on Truth (1984), is very plaus ible as a revised account of the traditional story. However, close examination of the seduction theory papers and of other contemporary documents reveals that Freud's later reports of the episode, the foun dation on which Masson builds his case, are false. Some purported his torical events that Masson uses to buttress his case are also shown to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  46.  79
    Jeffrey P. Bishop, The Anticipatory Corpse: Medicine, Power and the Care of the Dying.Antje Kahl - 2014 - Human Studies 37 (4):589-596.
    “[T]here is something rotten at the heart of medicine” —this is one of the central statements of Jeffrey Paul Bishop in his book The Anticipatory Corpse. Medicine, Power and the Care of the Dying. The obvious, if somewhat morbid, thought that “rotten” would refer to the decaying body as the central subject of investigation is, however, misleading. Instead, Bishop aims to demonstrate that the modern trend of medicalizing dying and death is the wrong way.The book explores contemporary medicine’s practices, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  88
    In Memory of Richard Jeffrey: Some Reminiscences and Some Reflections on The Logic of Decision.Alan Hájek - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):947-958.
    This paper is partly a tribute to Richard Jeffrey, partly a reflection on some of his writings, The Logic of Decision in particular. I begin with a brief biography and some fond reminiscences of Dick. I turn to some of the key tenets of his version of Bayesianism. All of these tenets are deployed in my discussion of his response to the St. Petersburg paradox, a notorious problem for decision theory that involves a game of infinite expectation. Prompted by (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  48.  3
    Jeffrey Barnouw is Professor of English and Comparative Literature in the University of Texas at Austin. He has Published Numerous Articles on Hobbes and Written Extensively on the History of Ideas, Especially 17th-and 18th-Century Thought. His Latest Research has Concentrated on Greek Philosophy and Literature as Well as Their Role in the Later European Tradition. His Recent. [REVIEW]Jeffrey Barnouw - 2008 - Hobbes Studies 21 (1):109-110.
  49.  3
    Jeffrey Andrew Barash on Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos, by Peter E. Gordon. [REVIEW]Jeffrey Andrew Barash - 2012 - History and Theory 51 (3):436-450.
    In 1929 Ernst Cassirer and Martin Heidegger participated in a momentous debate in Davos, Switzerland, which is widely held to have marked an important division in twentieth-century European thought. Peter E. Gordon’s recent book, Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos, centers on this debate between these two philosophical adversaries. In his book Gordon examines the background of the debate, the issues that distinguished the respective positions of Cassirer and Heidegger, and the legacy of the debate for later decades. Throughout the work, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  6
    Strategies for Promoting Safe Sects: Response to Brandon Daniel-Hughes and Jeffrey B. Speaks.F. LeRon Shults - 2018 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 39 (3):80.
    I am extremely grateful to Brandon Daniel-Hughes and Jeffrey Speaks for their careful reading of my proposals in Theology after the Birth of God and Practicing Safe Sects and for their insightful suggestions for clarifying the project and following out its social implications. Both essays were instructive and provocative, providing exactly the kind of critical and constructive commentary that authors hope their work will evoke. We share a great deal in common, including a robustly naturalist metaphysics, an appreciation for (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 1000