4 found
See also
  1.  18
    Can Theories of Mental Representation Adequately Explain Mental Imagery?Jelena Issajeva - 2020 - Foundations of Science 25 (2):341-355.
    Traditionally it is taken for granted that mental imagery is a mental representation of some kind or format. This yields that theory of MR can give an adequate and exhaustive explanation of MI. Such co-relation between the two is usually seen as unproblematic. But is it really so? This article aims at challenging the theoretical claim that the dominant ‘two-world’ account of MR can adequately explain MI. Contrary to the standard theory of MR, there are reasons to believe that: MI (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  14
    Sign Theory at Work: The Mental Imagery Debate Revisited.Jelena Issajeva - 2015 - Sign Systems Studies 43 (4):584-596.
    This article attempts to give a plausible explanation to the long-debated question about the nature of mental imagery. The traditional approach to this question is based on the representational paradigm, which, I claim, is misguided. Instead of representational aspects of mental imagery, I emphasize the functions of mental imagery, the variety of properties that images exhibit in experimental studies, and the relations between different characteristics of images, their functions and the subject of imagery. That is, I propose to account for (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  3.  35
    AW Carus: Carnap and Twentieth-Century Thought. Explication as Enlightenment.Jelena Issajeva - 2012 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 5 (1).
  4. Phaneroscopy and Theory of Signs as Theory of Cognition.Jelena Issajeva & Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen - 2019 - In Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen & Mohammad Shafiei (eds.), Peirce and Husserl: Mutual Insights on Logic, Mathematics and Cognition. Springer Verlag.
    No categories
    Export citation