Results for 'Jeremy Ray Garrett'

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  14
    Jeremy R. Garrett, Ed. , The Ethics of Animal Research: Exploring the Controversy . Reviewed By.Patrick Clipsham - 2015 - Philosophy in Review 35 (2):67-69.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  15
    Review of Jeremy R. Garrett, Ed., The Ethics of Animal Research: Exploring the Controversy. [REVIEW]John Rossi - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (2):63 - 65.
  3.  43
    Innovation and the Pharmaceutical Industry: Critical Reflections on the Virtues of Profit, Edited by H. Tristram Engelhardt and Jeremy R. Garrett. Salem, MA: M & M Scrivener Press; 2008. 250 Pp. $69.00. [REVIEW]D. Robert MacDougall - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (2):264.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  20
    Public Reasons for Private Vows: A Response to Gilboa.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2009 - Public Affairs Quarterly 23 (3):261-273.
    The question of whether a liberal state ought to recognize same-sex marriage must be situated within a broader inquiry into the proper relationship between political liberalism and marriage simpliciter. This general inquiry invites a diverse set of responses to the narrower question.A first widely held view—call it thick marital egalitarianism—sees a straightforward link from central liberal values, such as neutrality, equality, and nondiscrimination, to the full and equal inclusion of all willing partnerships into the thickly constituted, state-defined institution of marriage. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5.  19
    The Ethics of Animal Research: Exploring the Controversy.Jeremy R. Garrett (ed.) - 2012 - Mit Press.
    A balanced, accessible discussion of whether and on what grounds animal research can be ethically justified.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  6.  16
    Marriage Unhitched From the State: A Defense.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2009 - Public Affairs Quarterly 23 (2):161-180.
    In 1970, President Richard Nixon expressed his unambiguous support for interracial marriage; as for same-sex marriage, he exclaimed, "I can't go that far—that's the year 2000" . Nixon's prescient remark, made shortly after the Supreme Court's 1967 decision in Loving v. Virginia to overturn anti-miscegenation laws, expresses at once hesitancy for, yet resigned acceptance of, the inevitable expansion of civil marriage to include more and more kinds of loving partnerships. Nearly forty years later, Nixon's uncanny prediction appears close to being (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  7.  7
    A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Stakeholder Attitudes to Alternatives to Prospective Informed Consent in Paediatric Acute Care Research.Jeremy Furyk, Kris McBain-Rigg, Bronia Renison, Kerrianne Watt, Richard Franklin, Theophilus I. Emeto, Robin A. Ray, Franz E. Babl & Stuart Dalziel - 2018 - BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):89.
    A challenge of performing research in the paediatric emergency and acute care setting is obtaining valid prospective informed consent from parents. The ethical issues are complex, and it is important to consider the perspective of participants, health care workers and researchers on research without prospective informed consent while planning this type of research. We performed a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines, of empirical evidence relating to the process, experiences and acceptability of alternatives to prospective informed consent, in the paediatric (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  2
    Does Anyone Need to Regulate Parental Access to Fetal Genetic Information?Jeremy R. Garrett - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (2):28-30.
    Prospective parents have long been interested in knowing as much information about their children as early as possible. This interest is not—and never has been—strictly limited to significant “medi...
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9.  19
    Collectivizing Rescue Obligations in Bioethics.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (2):3-11.
    Bioethicists invoke a duty to rescue in a wide range of cases. Indeed, arguably, there exists an entire medical paradigm whereby vast numbers of medical encounters are treated as rescue cases. The intuitive power of the rescue paradigm is considerable, but much of this power stems from the problematic way that rescue cases are conceptualized—namely, as random, unanticipated, unavoidable, interpersonal events for which context is irrelevant and beneficence is the paramount value. In this article, I critique the basic assumptions of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  10.  11
    It’s the Idiom, Stupid: A Plea for Formal Rhetorical Analysis in Bioethics.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):67-69.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  48
    History, Tradition, and the Normative Foundations of Civil Marriage.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2008 - The Monist 91 (3-4):446-474.
  12.  6
    More Than Warm Fuzzy Feelings: The Imperative of Institutional Morale in Hospital Pandemic Responses.Jeremy R. Garrett & Leslie Ann McNolty - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (7):92-94.
    Volume 20, Issue 7, July 2020, Page 92-94.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  13.  23
    Patient Autonomy and the Twenty-First Century Physician.Jeremy R. Garrett & John D. Lantos - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (5):3-3.
    In this issue of the Report, Daniel Groll suggests new ways to understand old tensions between autonomy and paternalism. He categorizes disagreements between doctors and patients in four ways. Some are about the ends or goals of medical treatment. For these, he claims, patient choices are based upon patient values, and physicians should neither challenge nor assess them. More common are disagreements about the appropriate means to achieve an agreed-upon goal. These subdivide into two distinct categories—those in which the relative (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  10
    Our Next Pandemic Ethics Challenge? Allocating “Normal” Health Care Services.Jeremy R. Garrett, Leslie Ann McNolty, Ian D. Wolfe & John D. Lantos - 2020 - Hastings Center Report 50 (3):79-80.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  11
    Prologomena to Any Future Pediatric Bioethics.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):63-65.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  16.  5
    Response to Open Peer Commentaries “Rethinking the Ethical, Legal, and Clinical Foundations of Informed Consent and Shared Decision-Making for Brain Death Determination”.Jeremy R. Garrett & Ivor Berkowitz - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):W1-W5.
    Volume 20, Issue 6, June 2020, Page W1-W5.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  16
    Reframing the Ethical Debate Regarding Incidental Findings in Genetic Research.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (2):44-46.
  18.  5
    Two Agendas for Bioethics: Critique and Integration.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2015 - Bioethics 29 (6):440-447.
    Many bioethicists view the primary task of bioethics as ‘value clarification’. In this article, I argue that the field must embrace two more ambitious agendas that go beyond mere clarification. The first agenda, critique, involves unmasking, interrogating, and challenging the presuppositions that underlie bioethical discourse. These largely unarticulated premises establish the boundaries within which problems can be conceptualized and solutions can be imagined. The function of critique, then, is not merely to clarify these premises but to challenge them and the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  19.  4
    The Poverty of Value Clarification: Using Ethical Theory to Critique and Transcend the “Givens” of Clinical Ethics Consultation.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (9):48-51.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  19
    What We Do When We Resuscitate Extremely Preterm Infants.Jeremy R. Garrett, Brian S. Carter & John D. Lantos - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (8):1-3.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  21.  49
    Why the Old Sexual Morality of the New Natural Law Undermines Traditional Marriage.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2008 - Social Theory and Practice 34 (4):591-622.
  22. Utilitarianism, Vegetarianism, and Human Health: A Response to the Causal Impotence Objection.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2007 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (3):223–237.
  23. A Prima Facie Case Against Civil Marriage.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2009 - Southwest Philosophy Review 25 (1):41-53.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  24.  1
    Against Multiplying Clinical Ethics Standards Without Necessity: The Case for Parsimony in Evaluating Decision-Making Capacity.Jeremy R. Garrett, John C. Moskop & J. Clint Parker - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (11):87-89.
    Decision-making capacity is, in many ways, a central organizing concept of modern health care ethics. Patients with DMC have the moral—if not always the legal—authority to make all manner of...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  46
    Bariatric Surgery and the Social Character of the Obesity Epidemic.Jeremy R. Garrett & Leslie Ann McNolty - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (12):20-22.
  26.  4
    Beyond Harms and Benefits: Rethinking Duties to Disclose Misattributed Parentage.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2015 - Hastings Center Report 45 (4):37-38.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  6
    Bioethics: Concepts, Conflicts, and Controversies.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (3):227 – 230.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  23
    A Framework for Analyzing the Ethics of Disclosing Genetic Research Findings.Lisa Eckstein, Jeremy R. Garrett & Benjamin E. Berkman - 2014 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 42 (2):190-207.
    Over the past decade, there has been an extensive debate about whether researchers have an obligation to disclose genetic research findings, including primary and secondary findings. There appears to be an emerging (but disputed) view that researchers have some obligation to disclose some genetic findings to some research participants. The contours of this obligation, however, remain unclear. -/- As this paper will explore, much of this confusion is definitional or conceptual in nature. The extent of a researcher’s obligation to return (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  29.  18
    The Strange Tale of Three Identical Strangers: Cinematic Lessons in Bioethics.Bryanna Moore, Jeremy R. Garrett, Leslie Ann McNolty & Maria Cristina Murano - 2019 - Hastings Center Report 49 (1):21-23.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  5
    Mediumnic Lights, Xx Rays, and the Spirit Who Photographed Herself.Jeremy Stolow - 2016 - Critical Inquiry 42 (4):923-951.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  31.  37
    Bioethics and the Philosophy of Medicine: A Thirty-Year Perspective.J. R. Engelhardt, Jeremy R. Garrett & Fabrice Jotterand - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (6):565 – 568.
  32.  13
    Why Are There So Few Ethics Consults in Children’s Hospitals?Brian Carter, Manuel Brockman, Jeremy Garrett, Angie Knackstedt & John Lantos - 2018 - HEC Forum 30 (2):91-102.
    In most children’s hospitals, there are very few ethics consultations, even though there are many ethically complex cases. We hypothesize that the reason for this may be that hospitals develop different mechanisms to address ethical issues and that many of these mechanisms are closer in spirit to the goals of the pioneers of clinical ethics than is the mechanism of a formal ethics consultation. To show how this is true, we first review the history of collaboration between philosophers and physicians (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  33.  11
    Engaging Pediatric Health Professionals in Interactive Online Ethics Education.Diane M. Plantz, Jeremy R. Garrett, Brian Carter, Angela D. Knackstedt, Vanessa S. Watkins & John Lantos - 2014 - Hastings Center Report 44 (6):15-20.
  34. Ethical Issues Posed by Cluster Randomized Trials in Health Research.Charles Weijer, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Monica Taljaard, Ariella Binik, Robert Boruch, Jamie C. Brehaut, Allan Donner, Martin P. Eccles, Antonio Gallo, Andrew D. McRae & Ray Saginur - 2011 - Trials 1 (12):100.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  35.  75
    Bioethics and the Philosophy of Medicine: A Thirty-Year Perspective.H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jeremy Garrett & Fabrice Jotterand - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (6):565-568.
  36.  4
    Legal and Ethical Considerations for Requiring Consent for Apnea Testing in Brain Death Determination.Ivor Berkowitz & Jeremy R. Garrett - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):4-16.
    The past decade has witnessed escalating legal and ethical challenges to the diagnosis of death by neurologic criteria. The legal tactic of demanding consent for the apnea test, if successful, can halt the DNC. However, US law is currently unsettled and inconsistent in this matter. Consent has been required in several trial cases in Montana and Kansas but not in Virginia and Nevada. In this paper, we analyze and evaluate the legal and ethical bases for requiring consent before apnea testing (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  37.  4
    Principles Over Propositions: Or, How to Reject Metaphysical Neutrality in Bioethics.Leslie Ann McNolty & Jeremy R. Garrett - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (6):31-34.
    The emergence and development of the field of clinical ethics coincided with the revitalization of moral philosophy following the publication of John Rawls’ ma...
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  38.  8
    For Whom the Burden Tolls: Gender and the Unequal Management of Fetal Risks and Parental Expectations.Leslie Ann McNolty & Jeremy R. Garrett - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):17-19.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39. Who is the Research Subject in Cluster Randomized Trials in Health Research?Andrew D. McRae, Ariella Binik, Charles Weijer, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Monica Taljaard, Robert Boruch, Jamie C. Brehaut, Allan Donner, Martin P. Eccles, Antonio Gallo, Ray Saginur & Merrick Zwarenstein - 2011 - Trials 1 (12):118.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  40.  5
    One Exemption Too Many: The Case for Mandated CCHD Screening.John D. Lantos, Julie Caciki & Jeremy R. Garrett - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (1):3-5.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  20
    New British Philosophy: The Interviews.Julian Baggini & Jeremy Stangroom (eds.) - 2002 - Routledge.
    From popular introductions to biographies and television programmes, philosophy is everywhere. Many people even want to _be_ philosophers, usually in the café or the pub. But what do real philosophers do? What are the big philosophical issues of today? Why do they matter? How did some our best philosophers get into philosophy in the first place? Read _New British Philosophy_ and find out for the first time. Clear, engaging and designed for a general audience, sixteen fascinating interviews with some of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  42.  24
    New British Philosophy. The Interviews1.Julian Baggini & Jeremy Stangroom - 2008 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 15 (2):247-261.
    From popular introductions to biographies and television programmes, philosophy is everywhere. Many people even want to be philosophers, usually in the café or the pub. But what do real philosophers do? What are the big philosophical issues of today? Why do they matter? How did some our best philosophers get into philosophy in the first place? Read New British Philosophy and find out for the first time. Clear, engaging and designed for a general audience, sixteen fascinating interviews with some of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43. Symmetries and Paraparticles as a Motivation for Structuralism.Adam Caulton & Jeremy Butterfield - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (2):233-285.
    This article develops an analogy proposed by Stachel between general relativity (GR) and quantum mechanics (QM) as regards permutation invariance. Our main idea is to overcome Pooley's criticism of the analogy by appeal to paraparticles. In GR, the equations are (the solution space is) invariant under diffeomorphisms permuting spacetime points. Similarly, in QM the equations are invariant under particle permutations. Stachel argued that this feature—a theory's ‘not caring which point, or particle, is which’—supported a structuralist ontology. Pooley criticizes this analogy: (...)
    Direct download (15 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  44. The Preference Toward Identified Victims and Rescue Duties.Tomasz Żuradzki - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (2):25-27.
    Jeremy R. Garrett claims that the nature and scope of our rescue duties cannot be properly understood and addressed without reference to social context or institutional background conditions. In my comment I focus not on social or institutional but on psychological background conditions that are also necessary for the conceptualization of rescue cases. These additional conditions are of crucial importance since an entire paradigm of “rescue medicine” is founded, as Garret notices, on the powerful and immediate “impulse to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  45.  26
    A Defense of Same-Sex Marriage.Avrum Stroll - 2009 - Public Affairs Quarterly 23 (4):343-355.
    In reply to Jeremy Garrett's criticism of my paper in the July 2009 issue of Public Affairs Quarterly, I, first, clarify my view of the proper status of same-sex marriage in a liberal society. I, second, defend my claim that moral disapprobation of homosexuality may be a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for denying same-sex couples the benefits and protections of the marriage license. Finally, I criticize the view that, as long as marriage is viewed as a contract to be (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  46.  67
    Garrett Hardin.Garrett Hardin - 2002 - In Ruth F. Chadwick & Doris Schroeder (eds.), Applied Ethics: Critical Concepts in Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 4--145.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47. © 1991 Jeremy@Jeremyanderson.Net.Jeremy Anderson - manuscript
    The contractarian theory elaborated by John Rawls in A Theory of Justice exploits the difference principle in a great many ways. Rawls argues that, when used as part of a set of guiding principles for structuring the basic institutions of society, it simplifies the problem of interpersonal comparisons (91-4)1, helps compensate for the arbitrariness of natural endowments (101-3), promotes a harmony of interests between citizens (104-5), reintroduces the principle of fraternity to democratic society (105-6), and, what is critical to his (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  2
    I—Garrett Cullity: Particularism and Presumptive Reasons.Garrett Cullity & Richard Holton - 2002 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76 (1):169-190.
    [Garrett Cullity] Weak particularism about reasons is the view that the normative valency of some descriptive considerations varies, while others have an invariant normative valency. A defence of this view needs to respond to arguments that a consideration cannot count in favour of any action unless it counts in favour of every action. But it cannot resort to a global holism about reasons, if it claims that there are some examples of invariant valency. This paper argues for weak particularism, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  49. Jeremy Smith [Catalog of the Exhibition Held at] Fischer Fine Art Ltd., London, 6 February-9 March 1979 [and] Mira Godard Gallery, Toronto, 28 April-19 May 1979. [REVIEW]Jeremy Smith & Ont Fischer Fine Art Limited - 1979 - [Fischer Fine Art Ltd.,].
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  1
    I—Garrett Cullity: Particularism and Presumptive Reasons.Garrett Cullity - 2002 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76 (1):169-190.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000