Results for 'Jes��s Zamora-bonilla'

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  55
    Verisimilitude and the Scientific Strategy of Economic Theory.JesÚ Zamora Bonilla & P. S. - 1999 - Journal of Economic Methodology 6 (3):331-350.
    Methodological norms in economic theorizing are interpreted as rational strategies to optimize some epistemic utility functions. A definition of ?empirical verisimilitude? is defended as a plausible interpretation of the epistemic preferences of researchers. Some salient differences between the scientific strategies of physics and of economics are derived from the comparison of the relative costs associated with each strategy. The classical discussion about the ?realism of assumptions? in economics is also considered under the light of the concept of ?empirical verisimilitude?
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  2.  40
    Science Studies and the Theory of Games.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 2006 - Perspectives on Science 14 (4):525-557.
    Being scientific research a process of social interaction, this process can be studied from a game-theoretic perspective. Some conceptual and formal instruments that can help to understand scientific research as a game are introduced, and it is argued that game theoretic epistemology provides a middle ground for 'rationalist' and 'constructivist' theories of scientific knowledge. In the first part , a description of the essential elements of game of science is made, using an inferentialist conception of rationality. In the second part (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  3. Why Are Good Theories Good? Reflections on Epistemic Values, Confirmation, and Formal Epistemology.Jesús Zamora-Bonilla - 2013 - Synthese 190 (9):1533-1553.
    Franz Huber’s (2008a) attempt to unify inductivist and hypothetico-deductivist intuitions on confirmation by means of a single measure are examined and compared with previous work on the theory of verisimilitude or truthlikeness. The idea of connecting ‘the logic of confirmation’ with ‘the logic of acceptability’ is also critically discussed, and it is argued that ‘acceptability’ takes necessarily into account some pragmatic criteria, and that at least two normative senses of ‘acceptability’ must be distinguished: ‘acceptable’ in the sense of ‘being allowed (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  16
    Science: The Rules of the Game.Jesús Zamora-Bonilla - 2010 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 18 (2):294-307.
    Popper’s suggestion of taking methodological norms as conventions is examined from the point of view of game theory. The game of research is interpreted as a game of persuasion, in the sense that every scientists tries to advance claims, and that her winning the game consists in her colleagues accepting some of those claims as the conclusions of some arguments. Methodological norms are seen as elements in a contract established amongst researchers, that says what inferential moves are legitimate or compulsory (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  7
    The Elementary Economics of Scientific Consensus.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 1999 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 14 (3):461-488.
    The scientist’s decision of accepting a given proposition is assumed to be dependent on two factors: the scientist’s ‘private’ information about the value of that statement and the proportion of colleagues who also accept it. This interdependence is modelled in an economic fashion, and it is shown that it may lead to multiple equilibria. The main conclusions are that the evolution of scientific knowledge can be path-dependent, that scientific revolutions can be due to very small changes in the empirical evidence, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  6. What's New in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences?. Guest Editors'introduction.Reiss Julian, Teira David & Bonilla Jesus Zamora - 2008 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (3).
  7.  36
    Inferentialism, Degrees of Commitment, and Ampliative Reasoning.Rodríguez Xavier de Donato, Bonilla Jesús Zamora & Javier González De Prado Salas - forthcoming - Synthese:1-19.
    Our purpose in this paper is to contribute to a practice-based characterization of scientific inference. We want to explore whether Brandom’s pragmatist–inferentialist framework can suitably accommodate several types of ampliative inference common in scientific reasoning and explanation. First, we argue that Brandom’s view of induction in terms of merely permissive inferences is inadequate; in order to overcome the shortcoming of Brandom’s proposal, we put forward an alternative conception of inductive, probabilistic reasoning by appeal to the notion of degrees of commitment. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  26
    Pure Intuition: Miranda Fricker on the Economy of Prejudice.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2008 - Theoria : An International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science 23 (1):77-80.
    Two aspects of Miranda Fricker’s book are criticised: the implicit assumption that ethical theory can solve fundamental problems in epistemology, and the excessive reliance on testimony as a fundamental source of knowledge. Against the former, it is argued that ethical theories are based on cultural prejudices to a higher extent than epistemological theories. Against the latter, argumentation is proposed as a more important epistemic practice than testimony.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  90
    Pure Intuition: Miranda Fricker on the Economy of Prejudice.Bonilla Jesús Zamora - 2008 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 23 (1):77-80.
    Two aspects of Miranda Fricker’s book are criticised: the implicit assumption that ethical theory can solve fundamental problems in epistemology, and the excessive reliance on testimony as a fundamental source of knowledge. Against the former, it is argued that ethical theories are based on cultural prejudicesto a higher extent than epistemological theories. Against the latter, argumentation is proposed as a more important epistemic practice than testimony.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  1
    The Republic of Science and Its Constitution: Some Reflections on Scientific Methods as Institutions.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2019 - In Raphael Sassower & Nathaniel Laor (eds.), The Impact of Critical Rationalism: Expanding the Popperian Legacy Through the Works of Ian C. Jarvie. Springer Verlag. pp. 31-44.
    Jarvie’s Popper’s social view of science from Logik der Forschung to The Open Society and Its Enemies is used to discuss whether the “proto-constitution” of science that, according to Jarvie, Popper formulated is a sound justification of a falsificationist methodology, and whether the view of society and of social science grounding Popper’s views could be substituted for some more updated insights from contemporary social science. In particular, I defend that a game-theoretic view to the choice of norms, one that takes (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  3
    Inferentialism, Degrees of Commitment, and Ampliative Reasoning.Jesús Zamora Bonilla, Xavier de Donato Rodríguez & Javier González de Prado Salas - 2017 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 4):909-927.
    Our purpose in this paper is to contribute to a practice-based characterization of scientific inference. We want to explore whether Brandom’s pragmatist–inferentialist framework can suitably accommodate several types of ampliative inference common in scientific reasoning and explanation. First, we argue that Brandom’s view of induction in terms of merely permissive inferences is inadequate; in order to overcome the shortcoming of Brandom’s proposal, we put forward an alternative conception of inductive, probabilistic reasoning by appeal to the notion of degrees of commitment. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  85
    Credibility, Idealisation, and Model Building: An Inferential Approach.Xavier Donato Rodríguez & Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2009 - Erkenntnis 70 (1):101-118.
    In this article we defend the inferential view of scientific models and idealisation. Models are seen as "inferential prostheses" construed by means of an idealisation-concretisation process, which we essentially understand as a kind of counterfactual deformation procedure . The value of scientific representation is understood in terms not only of the success of the inferential outcomes arrived at with its help, but also of the heuristic power of representation and their capacity to correct and improve our models. This provides us (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  13.  87
    Science as a Persuasion Game: An Inferentialist Approach.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2006 - Episteme 2 (3):189-201.
    Scientific research is reconstructed as a language game along the lines of Robert Brandom's inferentialism. Researchers are assumed to aim at persuading their colleagues of the validity of some claims. The assertions each scientist is allowed or committed to make depend on her previous claims and on the inferential norms of her research community. A classification of the most relevant types of inferential rules governing such a game is offered, and some ways in which this inferentialist approach can be used (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  14. The Elementary Economics of Scientific Consensus.Bonilla Jesús P. Zamora - 1999 - Theoria 14 (3):461-488.
    The scientist's decision of accepting a given proposition is assumed to be dependent on two factors: the scientist's 'private' information about the value of that statement and the proportion of colleagues who also accept it. This interdependence is modelled in an economic fashion, and it is shown that it may lead to multiple equilibria. The main conclusions are that the evolution of scientific knowledge can be path, dependent, that scientific revolutions can be due to very small changes in the empirical (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  15.  82
    Meaning and Testability in the Structuralist Theory of Science.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 2003 - Erkenntnis 59 (1):47 - 76.
    The connection between scientific knowledge and our empirical access to realityis not well explained within the structuralist approach to scientific theories. I arguethat this is due to the use of a semantics not rich enough from the philosophical pointof view. My proposal is to employ Sellars–Brandom's inferential semantics to understand how can scientific terms have empirical content, and Hintikka's game-theoretical semantics to analyse how can theories be empirically tested. The main conclusions are that scientific concepts gain their meaning through `basic (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  16.  42
    What's New in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences?: Guest Editors' Introduction.Julian Reiss, David Teira & Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2008 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (3):311-313.
  17.  90
    Optimal Judgment Aggregation.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2007 - Philosophy of Science 74 (5):813-824.
    The constitution of a collective judgment is analyzed from a contractarian point of view. The optimal collective judgment is defined as the one that maximizes the sum of the utility each member gets from the collective adoption of that judgment. It is argued that judgment aggregation is a different process from the aggregation of information and public deliberation. This entails that the adoption of a collective judgment should not make any rational member of the group change her individual opinion, and (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  18.  9
    Editor's Presentation. Darwinism and Social Science: Is There Any Hope for the Reductionist?Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2010 - Theoria : An International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science 18 (3):255-257.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. Scientific Controversies and the Ethics of Arguing and Belief in the Face of Rational Disagreement.Xavier de Donato Rodríguez & Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (1):39-65.
    Our main aim is to discuss the topic of scientific controversies in the context of a recent issue that has been the centre of attention of many epistemologists though not of argumentation theorists or philosophers of science, namely the ethics of belief in face of rational disagreement. We think that the consideration of scientific examples may be of help in the epistemological debate on rational disagreement, making clear some of the deficiencies of the discussion as it has been produced until (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  12
    Meaning and Testability in the Structuralist Theory of Science.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2003 - Erkenntnis 59 (1):47-76.
    The connection between scientific knowledge and our empirical access to reality is not well explained within the structuralist approach to scientific theories. I argue that this is due to the use of a semantics not rich enough from the philosophical point of view. My proposal is to employ Sellars-Brandom's inferential semantics to understand how can scientific terms have empirical content, and Hintikka's game-theoretical semantics to analyse how can theories be empirically tested. The main conclusions are that scientific concepts gain their (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  34
    The Politics of Positivism: Disinterested Predictions From Interested Agents.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - unknown
    Of the six sections composing «The Methodology of Posive Economics», the first one («The Relation between Positive and Normative Economics») is apparently the less discussed in the F53 literature, probably as a result of being the shortest one and the less relevant for the realism issue, all at once. In view of Milton Friedman’s subsequent career as a political preacher, it seems difficult not to wonder whether this first section ruled it the way the other five directed Friedman’s scientific performance. (...)
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. Credibility, Idealisation, and Model Building: An Inferential Approach.Xavier Donato Rodríguedez & Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2009 - Erkenntnis 70 (1).
    In this article we defend the inferential view of scientific models and idealisation. Models are seen as “inferential prostheses” (instruments for surrogative reasoning) construed by means of an idealisation-concretisation process, which we essentially understand as a kind of counterfactual deformation procedure (also analysed in inferential terms). The value of scientific representation is understood in terms not only of the success of the inferential outcomes arrived at with its help, but also of the heuristic power of representation and their capacity to (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23. Where is Economic Methodology Going? Jesus P. Zamora Bonilla.Jesus P. Zamora Bonilla - 2001 - Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (1):135-138.
  24. Scientific Inference and the Pursuit of Fame: A Contractarian Approach.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (2):300-323.
    Methodological norms are seen as rules defining a competitive game, and it is argued that rational recognition-seeking scientists can reach a collective agreement about which specific norms serve better their individual interests, especially if the choice is made `under a veil of ignorance', i.e. , before knowing what theory will be proposed by each scientist. Norms for theory assessment are distinguished from norms for theory choice (or inference rules), and it is argued that pursuit of recognition only affects this second (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  25. An Economic Model of Scientific Rules.José Luis Ferreira & Jesús Zamora-bonilla - 2006 - Economics and Philosophy 22 (2):191-212.
    Empirical reports on scientific competition show that scientists can be depicted as self-interested, strategically behaving agents. Nevertheless, we argue that recognition-seeking scientists will have an interest in establishing methodological norms which tend to select theories of a high epistemic value, and that these norms will be still more stringent if the epistemic value of theories appears in the utility function of scientists, either directly or instrumentally. (Published Online July 11 2006) Footnotes1 The author gratefully acknowledges financial support from DGI grant (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  26.  5
    Realism Versus Anti-Realism: Philosophical Problem or Scientific Concern?Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2019 - Synthese 196 (10):3961-3977.
    The decision whether to have a realist or an anti-realist attitude towards scientific hypotheses is interpreted in this paper as a choice that scientists themselves have to face in their work as scientists, rather than as a ‘philosophical’ problem. Scientists’ choices between realism and instrumentalism are interpreted in this paper with the help of two different conceptual tools: a deflationary semantics grounded in the inferentialist approach to linguistic practices developed by some authors, and an epistemic utility function that tries to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  27.  9
    The Nature of Co-Authorship: A Note on Recognition Sharing and Scientific Argumentation.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2014 - Synthese 191 (1):97-108.
    Co-authorship of papers is very common in most areas of science, and it has increased as the complexity of research has strengthened the need for scientific collaboration. But the fact that papers have more than an author tends to complicate the attribution of merit to individual scientists. I argue that collaboration does not necessarily entail co-authorship, but that in many cases the latter is an option that individual authors might not choose, at least in principle: each author might publish in (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  28.  30
    Verisimilitude and the Scientific Strategy of Economic Theory.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 1999 - Journal of Economic Methodology 6 (3):331-350.
  29.  26
    The Nature of Co-Authorship: A Note on Recognition Sharing and Scientific Argumentation.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2012 - Synthese (1):1-12.
    Co-authorship of papers is very common in most areas of science, and it has increased as the complexity of research has strengthened the need for scientific collaboration. But the fact that papers have more than an author tends to complicate the attribution of merit to individual scientists. I argue that collaboration does not necessarily entail co-authorship, but that in many cases the latter is an option that individual authors might not choose, at least in principle: each author might publish in (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  30.  13
    What Games Do Scientists Play? Rationality and Objectivity in a Game-Theoretic Approach to the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge.Jesús Zamora-Bonilla - 2010 - In M. Dorato M. Suàrez (ed.), Epsa Epistemology and Methodology of Science. Springer. pp. 323--332.
  31.  9
    The Social Contract of Science.J. Francisco Álvarez & Jesús Zamora-Bonilla - 2013 - In Christopher Luetege (ed.), Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics. Springer. pp. 1523--1533.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  32.  7
    Zamora Bonilla, Jesús: Sacando consecuencias. Una filosofía para el siglo XXI, tecnos, madrid, 2017, 227p.Adrián Requejo Doval - 2018 - Agora 37 (2).
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  48
    Optimal Judgment Aggregation.Jesus P. Zamora Bonilla - unknown
    A necessary condition for a group being taken as a rational agent is that its choices and judgements are ‘logically contestable’, but this can lead to problems of aggregation, as Arrow impossibility theorem or the discursive dilemma. This paper proposes a contractarian or constitutional approach: the relevant thing is what aggregation mechanisms would be preferred by the members of the group. Two distinctions need to be made: first, judgement aggregation is not aggregation of decisions, and judgement aggregation needs be distinguished (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  34.  49
    Brian Skyrms. 2010. Signals: Evolution, Learning, and Information (Jesús Zamora Bonilla).Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2012 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 27 (3):400-402.
  35. La Lonja Del Saber.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2004
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  27
    Collective Actors Without Collective Minds: An Inferentialist Approach.Javier González de Prado Salas & Jesús Zamora-Bonilla - 2015 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45 (1):3-25.
    We present an inferentialist account of collective rationality and intentionality, according to which beliefs and other intentional states are understood in terms of the normative statuses attributed to, and undertaken by, the participants of a discursive practice—namely, their discursive or practical commitments and entitlements. Although these statuses are instituted by the performances and attitudes of the agents, they are not identified with any physical or psychological entity, process or relation. Therefore, we argue that inferentialism allows us to talk of collective (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  37. Science, Normativity and the Public.David Teira & Jesus Zamora Bonilla - 2007 - Social epistemology. 21.1 21 (1):1-81.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38. Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science.Ian Jarvie & Jesus Zamora-Bonilla (eds.) - 2011 - Sage Publications.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  6
    An Economic Model Of Scientific Rules.JosÉ Ferreira & Jesús Zamora-Bonilla - 2006 - Economics and Philosophy 22 (2):191-212.
    Empirical reports on scientific competition show that scientists can be depicted as self-interested, strategically behaving agents. Nevertheless, we argue that recognition-seeking scientists will have an interest in establishing methodological norms which tend to select theories of a high epistemic value, and that these norms will be still more stringent if the epistemic value of theories appears in the utility function of scientists, either directly or instrumentally.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  82
    Truthlikeness with a Human Face: On Some Connections Between the Theory of Verisimilitude and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):361-369.
    Verisimilitude theorists (and many scientific realists) assume that science attempts to provide hypotheses with an increasing degree of closeness to the full truth; on the other hand, radical sociologists of science assert that flesh and bone scientists struggle to attain much more mundane goals (such as income, power, fame, and so on). This paper argues that both points of view can be made compatible, for (1) rational individuals only would be interested in engaging in a strong competition (such as that (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  3
    La adaptación del darwinismo al medio hostil de la ficción audiovisual : limitaciones inherentes al medio para la representación y divulgación de las teorías de la evolución por selección natural en cine y televisión.Miguel Álvarez Peralta & Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2010 - Endoxa 24:377.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. The SAGE Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences.Ian C. Jarvie & Jesus Zamora-Bonilla (eds.) - 2011 - Sage Publications.
  43. An Invitation to Methodonomics.J. P. Zamora Bonilla - 1997 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 61:233-254.
  44.  13
    Cooperation, Competition, and the Contractarian View of Scientific Research.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - unknown
    Using the approach known as ‘Economics of Scientific Knowledge’, this paper defends the view of scientific norms as the result of a ‘social contract’, i.e., as an equilibrium in the game of selecting the norms under which to proceed to play the game of scientific research and publication. A categorisation of the relevant types of scientific norms is offered, as well as a discussion about the incentives of the researchers in choosing some or other alternative rules.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45.  8
    Darwinism and Social Science: Is There Any Hope for the Reductionist?Jesús Zamora Bonilla - unknown
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  10
    Douglas, Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2010 - Theoria : An International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science 25 (1):99-102.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  8
    El debate sobre el cambio climático interpretado como un juego de persuasión.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla & Leonardo Monzonis Forner - 2013 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 28 (1):77-96.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  3
    Introducción a las comparaciones de confianza. [REVIEW]Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 1996 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 11 (2):227-228.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  2
    Inmaculada de Melo-Martín, Kristen Intemann. 2018. The Fight Against Doubt: How to Bridge the Gap Between Scientists and the Public. [REVIEW]Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2020 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 35 (1):131-132.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  6
    ¿Metodonomía de la ciencia?: una aplicación de la idea de verosimilitud.Jesús Pedro Zamora Bonilla - 1993 - Endoxa 1 (2):153.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 1000