Order:
  1.  26
    On the Provenance of Judgments of Conditional Probability.Jiaying Zhao, Anuj Shah & Daniel Osherson - 2009 - Cognition 113 (1):26-36.
  2.  12
    Updating: Learning Versus Supposing.Jiaying Zhao, Vincenzo Crupi, Katya Tentori, Branden Fitelson & Daniel Osherson - 2012 - Cognition 124 (3):373-378.
  3.  38
    Updating Beliefs in Light of Uncertain Evidence: Descriptive Assessment of Jeffrey's Rule.Daniel Osherson & Jiaying Zhao - 2011 - Thinking and Reasoning 16 (4):288-307.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  4.  27
    Vision and Abstraction: An Empirical Refutation of Nico Orlandi’s Non-Cognitivism.Christopher Mole & Jiaying Zhao - 2015 - Philosophical Psychology 29 (3):365-373.
    This article argues against the non-cognitivist theory of vision that has been formulated in the work of Nico Orlandi. It shows that, if we understand ‘representation’ in the way Orlandi recommends, then the visual system’s response to abstract regularities must involve the formation of representations. Recent experiments show that those representations must be used by the visual system in the production of visual experiences. Their effects cannot be explained by taking them to be non-visual effects involving attention or memory. This (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  13
    Category-Based Updating.Jiaying Zhao & Daniel Osherson - 2013 - Thinking and Reasoning 20 (1):1-15.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  25
    Descriptive Assessment of Jeffrey's Rule.Jiaying Zhao & Daniel Osherson - unknown
    Jeffrey (1983) proposed a generalization of conditioning as a means of updating probability distributions when new evidence drives no event to certainty. His rule requires the stability of certain conditional probabilities through time. We tested this assumption (“invariance”) from the psychological point of view. In Experiment 1 participants offered probability estimates for events in Jeffrey’s candlelight example. Two further scenarios were investigated in Experiment 2, one in which invariance seems justified, the other in which it does not. Results were in (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Detecting Deviations From Randomness.Jiaying Zhao & Daniel Osherson - unknown
    We explore the ability to distinguish random from non-random events. Randomness is defined in terms of radioactive decay whereas non-randomness is quantified by excess repetitions (“repeat”) or alternations (“switch”) between successive bits. In the first four experiments no mention was made of randomness, probability, or related concepts in task instructions. We found superior performance in distinguishing random stimuli from repeat stimuli compared to switch stimuli. The last three experiments explicitly evoked the concept of randomness, thus allowing comparison of perceptual and (...)
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  1
    Statistical Regularities Reduce Perceived Numerosity.Jiaying Zhao & Ru Qi Yu - 2016 - Cognition 146:217-222.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography