Order:
  1.  48
    Was Foucault a Philosopher of Technology?Jim Gerrie - 2003 - Techne 7 (2):66-73.
  2.  20
    Was Foucault a Philosopher of Technology?Jim Gerrie - 2003 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 7 (2):66-73.
  3.  9
    Three Species of Technological Dependency.Jim Gerrie - 2008 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 12 (3):184-194.
    One can find from a survey of the work of three prominent philosophers of technology in the late twentieth century, a very different kind of metaphor for describing the powerful, but not fully determinative influence that technology has on our lives. These three theories each centre on a concept I call "technological dependency." The most prominent exponents of technological dependency are Marshall McLuhan, Herbert Marcuse and Jacques Ellul. Although there are similarities between their descriptions of the phenomenon of dependency, their (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  36
    Three Species of Technological Dependency.Jim Gerrie - 2008 - Techne 12 (3):184-194.
    One can find from a survey of the work of three prominent philosophers of technology in the late twentieth century, a very different kind of metaphor for describing the powerful, but not fully determinative influence that technology has on our lives. These three theories each centre on a concept I call "technological dependency." The most prominent exponents of technological dependency are Marshall McLuhan, Herbert Marcuse and Jacques Ellul. Although there are similarities between their descriptions of the phenomenon of dependency, their (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  27
    Using and Refusing.Jim Gerrie - 2012 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 16 (3):317-329.
    James Rachels has argued on Utilitarian grounds that since removing life-sustaining treatment and physician-assisted suicide both aim at the very same end,hastening death to limit suffering, there are no morally significant moral distinctions between them. Others have argued for maintaining this distinction based on various forms of deontological and rights-based ethical theories that maintain that all acts of killing are inherently wrong. I argue that the enduring controversy over physician-assisted suicide might not be caused by such fundamental differences of opinion (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  34
    Book Reviews. [REVIEW]Wallace A. Murphree, Jim Gerrie & Phillip H. Wiebe - 2005 - Sophia 44 (1):135-139.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark