Order:
  1.  10
    Fluctuation in cognitive engagement during listening and reading of erotica and horror stories.Ugo Ballenghein, Johanna K. Kaakinen, Geoffrey Tissier & Thierry Baccino - forthcoming - Cognition and Emotion.
    The present study examined whether emotional text content influences cognitive engagement and transportation during listening (Experiment 1) and reading (Experiment 2) of neutral, horror and erotic stories. In Experiment 1, fluctuation in arousal and cognitive engagement were measured by continuous arousal judgments and head movement recordings during story listening. Participants rated experienced transportation and emotional valence after each story. The results showed that emotional texts were more arousing and induced more transportation than neutral stories. There was less head motion overall (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. Impact of awe on topic interest and recognition memory for information in planetarium films.Oksana Kanerva, Tuomo Häikiö, Helmi Päällysaho & Johanna K. Kaakinen - forthcoming - Cognition and Emotion.
    We investigated the impact of situational awe on topic-specific interest and recognition memory for information presented in immersive planetarium films. Adult participants (N = 131) were recruited among science centre visitors who were going to view one of the films shown in the science centre’s planetarium. Participants responded to questions about prior knowledge, topic-specific interest in the film and background information before viewing one of the three planetarium films. After the film, they completed the topic-specific interest scale, epistemically-related emotion scales, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  43
    Incorporating semantics and individual differences in models of working memory.Janice M. Keenan, Jukka Hyönä & Johanna K. Kaakinen - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):742-742.
    Ruchkin et al.'s view of working memory as activated long-term memory is more compatible with language processing than models such as Baddeley's, but it raises questions about individual differences in working memory and the validity of domain-general capacity estimates. Does it make sense to refer to someone as having low working memory capacity if capacity depends on particular knowledge structures tapped by the task?
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark