34 found
Order:
Disambiguations
John A. Barker [35]John Anthony Barker [1]
  1.  64
    Towards Closure on Closure.Fred Adams, John A. Barker & Julia Figurelli - 2012 - Synthese 188 (2):179-196.
    Tracking theories of knowledge are widely known to have the consequence that knowledge is not closed. Recent arguments by Vogel and Hawthorne claim both that there are no legitimate examples of knowledge without closure and that the costs of theories that deny closure are too great. This paper considers the tracking theories of Dretske and Nozick and the arguments by Vogel and Hawthorne. We reject the arguments of Vogel and Hawthorne and evaluate the costs of closure denial for tracking theories (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  2.  14
    Methods Matter: Beating the Backward Clock.Murray Clarke, Fred Adams & John A. Barker - 2017 - Logos and Episteme 8 (1):99-112.
    In “Beat the (Backward) Clock,” we argued that John Williams and Neil Sinhababu’s Backward Clock Case fails to be a counterexample to Robert Nozick’s or Fred Dretske’s Theories of Knowledge. Williams’ reply to our paper, “There’s Nothing to Beat a Backward Clock: A Rejoinder to Adams, Barker and Clarke,” is a further attempt to defend their counterexample against a range of objections. In this paper, we argue that, despite the number and length of footnotes, Williams is still wrong.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  15
    Beat the (Backward) Clock.Fred Adams, John A. Barker & Murray Clarke - 2016 - Logos and Episteme 7 (3):353-361.
    In a recent very interesting and important challenge to tracking theories of knowledge, Williams & Sinhababu claim to have devised a counter-example to tracking theories of knowledge of a sort that escapes the defense of those theories by Adams & Clarke. In this paper we will explain why this is not true. Tracking theories are not undermined by the example of the backward clock, as interesting as the case is.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  62
    Conclusive Reasons, Knowledge, and Action.John A. Barker & Fred Adams - 2012 - Philosophical Issues 22 (1):35-52.
  5.  58
    'If' and 'Even If'.John A. Barker - 1980 - Analysis 40 (2):93 - 98.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Autism and the "Theory of Mind" Debate.Robert M. Gordon & John A. Barker - 1994 - In George Graham & G. Lynn Stephens (eds.), Philosophical Psychopathology. MIT Press.
  7.  14
    The Fallacy of Begging the Question.John A. Barker - 1976 - Dialogue 15 (2):241-255.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  8.  44
    Paradox Without Knowledge.John A. Barker - 1974 - Synthese 28 (2):261 - 270.
  9.  18
    Scriven on The Logic of Cause.John A. Barker - 1975 - Theory and Decision 6 (1):43-55.
  10.  55
    Knowledge, Ignorance and Presupposition.John A. Barker - 1974 - Analysis 35 (2):33 - 45.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  26
    Brand and Swain on Causation.John A. Barker - 1974 - Synthese 26 (3-4):396 - 400.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  12.  46
    Pragmatics and Definite Descriptions.John A. Barker - 1972 - Tulane Studies in Philosophy 21:63-84.
  13.  50
    Relevance Logic, Classical Logic, and Disjunctive Syllogism.John A. Barker - 1975 - Philosophical Studies 27 (6):361 - 376.
  14.  70
    Computer Modeling and the Fate of Folk Psychology.John A. Barker - 2002 - Metaphilosophy 33 (1-2):30-48.
  15.  8
    The Nature of Question-Begging Arguments.John A. Barker - 1978 - Dialogue 17 (3):490-498.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  16.  13
    What You Don't Know Won't Hurt You?John A. Barker - 1976 - American Philosophical Quarterly 13 (4):303 - 308.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  17.  7
    Aristotle Vs. Diodorus: Who Won the Fatalism Debate?John A. Barker & Thomas D. Paxson Jr - 1985 - Philosophy Research Archives 11:41-76.
    We develop a modified system of standard logic, Augmented Standard Logic , and we employ ASL in an effort to show that, contrary to prevailing opinion, both Aristotle and Diodorus presented impressive arguments, having valid structures and highly plausible premisses, in their famous fatalism debate. We argue that ASL, which contains standard logic and a full system of modal and temporal logic emanating from a modicum of primitives, should not only enable one to appreciate the sophisticated philosophizing which characterized this (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18.  2
    Cause and Condition.John A. Barker - 1975 - Proceedings of the XVth World Congress of Philosophy 5:503-506.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  15
    Audi's Theory of Practical Reasoning.John A. Barker - 1991 - Behavior and Philosophy 19 (2):49 - 58.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  28
    A Note on Knowledge and Belief.John A. Barker - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):143 - 144.
  21.  25
    Presupposition and Entailment.John A. Barker - 1976 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 17 (2):272-278.
  22.  1
    Knowledge and Causation.John A. Barker - 1972 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):313-324.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  1
    Pragmatics and Definite Descriptions.John A. Barker - 1972 - Tulane Studies in Philosophy 21:63-84.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  23
    Hypotheticals: Conditionals and Theticals.John A. Barker - 1973 - Philosophical Quarterly 23 (93):335-345.
  25.  22
    A Paradox of Knowing Whether.John A. Barker - 1975 - Mind 84 (334):281-283.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  24
    'If', '⊃', and the Principle of Exportation.John A. Barker - 1974 - Philosophical Studies 26 (2):127 - 133.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  14
    Aristotle Vs. Diodorus.John A. Barker & Thomas D. Paxson Jr - 1985 - Philosophy Research Archives 11:41-76.
    We develop a modified system of standard logic, Augmented Standard Logic (ASL), and we employ ASL in an effort to show that, contrary to prevailing opinion, both Aristotle and Diodorus presented impressive arguments, having valid structures and highly plausible premisses, in their famous fatalism debate. We argue that ASL, which contains standard logic and a full system of modal and temporal logic emanating from a modicum of primitives, should not only enable one to appreciate the sophisticated philosophizing which characterized this (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  17
    Socratic Ignorance Vindicated.John A. Barker - 1975 - Philosophical Studies 28 (1):71 - 75.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  13
    Knowledge and Causation.John A. Barker - 1972 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):313-324.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  3
    Abstract of Comments: Pollock on Epistemology and Probability.John A. Barker - 1983 - Noûs 17 (1):68 - 69.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. A Formal Analysis of Conditionals.John A. Barker - 1969 - [Carbondale, Southern Illinois University].
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Audi on Epistemic Disavowals.John A. Barker - 1976 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 57 (4):376.
  33. Aristotle Vs. Diodorus: Who Won the Fatalism Debate?John A. Barker & Thomas D. Paxson Jr - 1985 - Philosophy Research Archives 11:41-76.
    We develop a modified system of standard logic, Augmented Standard Logic, and we employ ASL in an effort to show that, contrary to prevailing opinion, both Aristotle and Diodorus presented impressive arguments, having valid structures and highly plausible premisses, in their famous fatalism debate. We argue that ASL, which contains standard logic and a full system of modal and temporal logic emanating from a modicum of primitives, should not only enable one to appreciate the sophisticated philosophizing which characterized this ancient (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Knowledge, ignorance and presupposition.John A. Barker - 1974 - Erkenntnis 35 (2):33.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography