65 found
Order:
Disambiguations
John A. Robertson [63]John Ancona Robertson [2]
  1.  13
    [Book Review] Children of Choice, Freedom and the New Reproductive Technologies. [REVIEW]John A. Robertson - 1996 - Criminal Justice Ethics 15 (1):67-74.
  2.  3
    The Dead Donor Rule.John A. Robertson - 1999 - Hastings Center Report 29 (6):6.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  3.  98
    Preconception Gender Selection.John A. Robertson - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (1):2 – 9.
    Safe and effective methods of preconception gender selection through flow cytometric separation of X- and Y-bearing sperm could greatly increase the use of gender selection by couples contemplating reproduction. Such a development raises ethical, legal, and social issues about the impact of such practices on offspring, on sex ratio imbalances, and on sexism and the status of women. This paper analyzes the competing interests in preconception gender selection, and concludes that its use to increase gender variety in a family, and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  4.  13
    Delimiting the Donor: The Dead Donor Rule.John A. Robertson - 1999 - Hastings Center Report 29 (6):6-14.
  5. Ethics and Policy in Embryonic Stem Cell Research.John Ancona Robertson - 1999 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (2):109-136.
    : Embryonic stem cells, which have the potential to save many lives, must be recovered from aborted fetuses or live embryos. Although tissue from aborted fetuses can be used without moral complicity in the underlying abortion, obtaining stem cells from embryos necessarily kills them, thus raising difficult questions about the use of embryonic human material to save others. This article draws on previous controversies over embryo research and distinctions between intrinsic and symbolic moral status to analyze these issues. It argues (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  6.  56
    Embryo Stem Cell Research: Ten Years of Controversy.John A. Robertson - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):191-203.
    This overview of 10 years of stem cell controversy reviews the moral conflict that has made ESCs so controversial and how this conflict plays itself out in the legal realm, focusing on the constitutional status of efforts to ban ESC research or ESC-derived therapies. It provides a history of the federal funding debate from the Carter to the Obama administrations, and the importance of the Raab memo in authorizing federal funding for research with privately derived ESCs despite the Dickey-Wicker ban (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  7.  21
    Embryo Stem Cell Research: Ten Years of Controversy.John A. Robertson - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):191-203.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  8. The Presumptive Primacy of Procreative Liberty.John A. Robertson - forthcoming - Bioethics.
  9.  95
    Quality of Life and Non-Treatment Decisions for Incompetent Patients: A Critique of the Orthodox Approach.Rebecca S. Dresser & John A. Robertson - 1989 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 17 (3):234-244.
  10.  28
    Quality of Life and Non-Treatment Decisions for Incompetent Patients: A Critique of the Orthodox Approach.Rebecca S. Dresser & John A. Robertson - 1989 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 17 (3):234-244.
  11.  47
    The Question of Human Cloning.John A. Robertson - 1994 - Hastings Center Report 24 (2):6-14.
  12.  44
    Pharmacogenetics: Ethical Issues and Policy Options.Allen E. Buchanan, Andrea Califano, Jeffrey Kahn, Elizabeth McPherson, John A. Robertson & Baruch A. Brody - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (1):1-15.
    : Pharmacogenetics offers the prospect of an era of safer and more effective drugs, as well as more individualized use of drug therapies. Before the benefits of pharmacogenetics can be realized, the ethical issues that arise in research and clinical application of pharmacogenetic technologies must be addressed. The ethical issues raised by pharmacogenetics can be addressed under six headings: regulatory oversight, confidentiality and privacy, informed consent, availability of drugs, access, and clinicians' changing responsibilities in the era of pharmacogenetic medicine. We (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  13.  15
    Symbolic Issues in Embryo Research.John A. Robertson - 1995 - Hastings Center Report 25 (1):37-38.
  14. What We May Do with Preembryos: A Response to Richard A. McCormick.John A. Robertson - 1991 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1 (4):293-302.
  15.  16
    CONCEPTION to Obtain Hematopoietic Stem Cells.John A. Robertson, Jeffrey P. Kahn & John E. Wagner - 2002 - Hastings Center Report 32 (3):34-40.
  16.  11
    Face Transplants: Enriching the Debate.John A. Robertson - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3):32 – 33.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  17.  52
    Surrogate Mothers: Not So Novel After All.John A. Robertson - 1983 - Hastings Center Report 13 (5):28-34.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  18.  7
    Second Thoughts on Living Wills.John A. Robertson - 1991 - Hastings Center Report 21 (6):6-9.
  19.  22
    Pregnancy and Prenatal Harm to Offspring: The Case of Mothers with PKU.John A. Robertson & Joseph D. Schulman - 1987 - Hastings Center Report 17 (4):23-33.
  20.  30
    Controversial Medical Treatment and the Right to Health Care.John Ancona Robertson - 2006 - Hastings Center Report 36 (6):15-20.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  21.  45
    Book ReviewsJohn Keown,. Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy: An Argument Against Legislation.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Pp. 318. $65.00 ; $23.00. [REVIEW]John A. Robertson - 2004 - Ethics 114 (3):621-623.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  15
    At Law: Meaning What You Sign.John A. Robertson - 1998 - Hastings Center Report 28 (4):22.
  23.  13
    Contractual Duties in Research, Surrogacy, and Stem Cell Donation.John A. Robertson - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (4):13-14.
  24.  46
    Extreme Prematurity and Parental Rights After Baby Doe.John A. Robertson - 2004 - Hastings Center Report 34 (4):32-39.
  25.  32
    The $1000 Genome: Ethical and Legal Issues in Whole Genome Sequencing of Individuals. [REVIEW]John A. Robertson - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (3):35-42.
    Progress in gene sequencing could make rapid whole genome sequencing of individuals affordable to millions of persons and useful for many purposes in a future era of genomic medicine. Using the idea of $1000 genome as a focus, this article reviews the main technical, ethical, and legal issues that must be resolved to make mass genotyping of individuals cost-effective and ethically acceptable. It presents the case for individual ownership of a person's genome and its information, and shows the implications of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  26.  4
    Blastocyst Transfer (Sic) is No Solution.John A. Robertson - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (6):18 – 20.
  27.  4
    Special Respect Redux.John A. Robertson - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (6):46 – 48.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  28.  20
    Extreme Prematurity and Parental Rights After Baby Doe: The Child Abuse Amendments of 1984 Established the Norms for Treating Disabled Newborns, but They Did Not Address the Treatment of Premature Babies. Parents and Physicians Need a Framework for Decisionmaking. A Decision Handed Down Recently by the Texas Supreme Court Is a Step Forward.John A. Robertson - 2004 - Hastings Center Report 34 (4):32.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  29.  43
    Introduction.John A. Robertson - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):175-190.
  30.  7
    The Case of the Switched Embryos.John A. Robertson - 1995 - Hastings Center Report 25 (6):13-19.
  31.  16
    Sequence Patents Are Not the Issue.John A. Robertson - 2002 - American Journal of Bioethics 2 (3):22 – 23.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  32.  14
    Is There an Ethical Problem Here?John A. Robertson - 2010 - Hastings Center Report 40 (2):3-3.
  33.  10
    Dilemma in Danville.John A. Robertson - 1981 - Hastings Center Report 11 (5):5-8.
  34.  13
    Policy Issues in a Non-Heart-Beating Donor Protocol.John A. Robertson - 1993 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 3 (2):241-250.
  35.  10
    NorPlant and Irresponsible Reproduction.John A. Robertson - 1995 - Hastings Center Report 25 (1):23-26.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  36.  12
    Cruzan: No Rights Violated.John A. Robertson - 1990 - Hastings Center Report 20 (5):8-9.
  37.  21
    Clear Thinking and Open Discussion Guide IOM's Report on Organ Donation.John T. Potts, Roger C. Herdman, Thomas L. Beauchamp & John A. Robertson - 1998 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 26 (2):166-168.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38.  11
    Professional Self-Regulation and Shared-Risk Programs for in Vitro Fertilization.John A. Robertson & Theodore J. Schneyer - 1997 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 25 (4):283-291.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  39.  11
    Compensating Injured Research Subjects: II. The Law.John A. Robertson - 1976 - Hastings Center Report 6 (6):29-31.
  40. Conception.John A. Robertson, Jeffrey P. Kahn & John E. Wagner - forthcoming - Hastings Center Report.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  7
    Ten Ways to Improve IRBs.John A. Robertson - 1979 - Hastings Center Report 9 (1):29-33.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  42.  15
    In Vitro Conception and Harm to the Unborn.John A. Robertson - 1978 - Hastings Center Report 8 (5):13-14.
  43.  53
    Big Bang Theory: More Reason to Scrap Bush's Stem Cell Policy.John A. Robertson, Cynthia B. Cohen & Insoo Hyun - 2008 - Hastings Center Report 38 (6):4-6.
  44.  24
    Legal Change and Stigma in Surrogacy and Abortion.John A. Robertson - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (2):192-195.
    Stigma marks both surrogacy and abortion. Legal change lessens stigma but may not remove it altogether. Post-legalization regulation may reinstall stigma by surrounding a legalized practice with barriers that make exercise of that right more difficult. As a result, law may reenact stigma even as it purports to take it away.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45.  7
    Medical Ethics in the Courtroom.John A. Robertson - 1974 - Hastings Center Report 4 (4):1-3.
  46.  5
    Professional Self-Regulation and Shared-Risk Programs for In Vitro Fertilization.John A. Robertson & Theodore J. Schneyer - 1997 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 25 (4):283-291.
  47.  17
    Procreative Liberty and the State's Burden of Proof in Regulating Noncoital Reproduction.John A. Robertson - 1988 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 16 (1-2):18-26.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  6
    Resolving Disputes Over Frozen Embryos.John A. Robertson - 1989 - Hastings Center Report 19 (6):7-12.
  49.  30
    Procreative Liberty and the State's Burden of Proof in Regulating Noncoital Reproduction.John A. Robertson - 1988 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 16 (1-2):18-26.
  50.  13
    Comment on Hospice of Washington's Policy.John A. Robertson - 1991 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1 (2):139-140.
1 — 50 / 65