8 found
Order:
  1.  45
    Why Essences Are Essential in the Psychology of Concepts.Woo-Kyoung Ahn, Charles Kalish, Susan A. Gelman, Douglas L. Medin, Christian Luhmann, Scott Atran, John D. Coley & Patrick Shafto - 2001 - Cognition 82 (1):59-69.
  2.  28
    Does Rank Have its Privilege? Inductive Inferences Within Folkbiological Taxonomies.John D. Coley, Douglas L. Medin & Scott Atran - 1997 - Cognition 64 (1):73-112.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  3.  35
    A Bird's Eye View: Biological Categorization and Reasoning Within and Across Cultures.Jeremy N. Bailenson, Michael S. Shum, Scott Atran, Douglas L. Medin & John D. Coley - 2002 - Cognition 84 (1):1-53.
    Many psychological studies of categorization and reasoning use undergraduates to make claims about human conceptualization. Generalizability of findings to other populations is often assumed but rarely tested. Even when comparative studies are conducted, it may be challenging to interpret differences. As a partial remedy, in the present studies we adopt a 'triangulation strategy' to evaluate the ways expertise and culturally different belief systems can lead to different ways of conceptualizing the biological world. We use three groups (US bird experts, US (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  4.  11
    Inductive Reasoning in Folkbiological Thought.John D. Coley, Douglas L. Medin, Julia Beth Proffitt, Elizabeth Lynch & Scott Atran - 1999 - In D. Medin & S. Atran (eds.), Folkbiology. MIT Press. pp. 211-12.
  5.  18
    Inductive Reasoning About Causally Transmitted Properties.Patrick Shafto, Charles Kemp, Elizabeth Baraff Bonawitz, John D. Coley & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2008 - Cognition 109 (2):175-192.
  6.  25
    Knowledge, Expectations, and Inductive Reasoning Within Conceptual Hierarchies.John D. Coley, Brett Hayes, Christopher Lawson & Michelle Moloney - 2004 - Cognition 90 (3):217-253.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7.  16
    Anthropocentric by Default? Attribution of Familiar and Novel Properties to Living Things.Melanie Arenson & John D. Coley - 2018 - Cognitive Science 42 (1):253-285.
    Humans naturally and effortlessly use a set of cognitive tools to reason about biological entities and phenomena. Two such tools, essentialist thinking and teleological thinking, appear to be early developmental cognitive defaults, used extensively in childhood and under limited circumstances in adulthood, but prone to reemerge under time pressure or cognitive load. We examine the nature of another such tool: anthropocentric thinking. In four experiments, we examined patterns of property attribution to a wide range of living and non-living objects, manipulating (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Massimo Turatto, Alessandro Angrilli, Veronica Mazza, Carlo Umilta(University of Padova) and Jon Driver (University College London) Looking Without Seeing the Background Change: Electrophysiological Correlates of Change Detection Versus Change Blindness, B1–B10 Amy E. Booth and Sandra R. Waxman (Northwestern University). [REVIEW]John D. Coley & Elliot Moreton - 2002 - Cognition 84:365-366.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark