9 found
Order:
  1.  44
    Privacy: What Everyone Needs to Know®.Leslie Francis & John G. Francis - 2017 - Oup Usa.
    Privacy is one of our most essential values, but popular understanding of it lags far behind the heat the concept generates. It's easy to understand why. The concept itself has shifted in U.S. law from autonomy, to property, to confidentiality. Further, with a host of cultural differences as to how privacy is understood globally and in different religions, and with nonstop technological advancements, its significance is continually evolving. Leslie P. and John G. Francis draw upon their extensive expertise in law, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  29
    Privacy, Confidentiality, and Justice.John G. Francis & Leslie P. Francis - 2014 - Journal of Social Philosophy 45 (3):408-431.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  3.  57
    Criminalizing Health-Related Behaviors Dangerous to Others? Disease Transmission, Transmission-Facilitation, and the Importance of Trust.Leslie Pickering Francis & John G. Francis - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (1):47-63.
    Statutes criminalizing behavior that risks transmission of HIV/AIDS exemplify use of the criminal law against individuals who are victims of infectious disease. These statutes, despite their frequency, are misguided in terms of the goals of the criminal law and the public health aim of reducing overall burdens of disease, for at least three important reasons. First, they identify individual offenders for punishment, a paradigm that is misplaced in the most typical contexts of transmission of infectious disease and even for HIV/AIDS, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  25
    Data Citizenship and Informed Consent.Leslie P. Francis & John G. Francis - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):38 - 39.
  5.  23
    Deliberative Democracy and the Use of Data for Public Health: Comments on Gould.Leslie P. Francis & John G. Francis - 2019 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 36 (2):192-197.
  6.  23
    Group Compromise: Perfect Cases Make Problematic Generalizations.Leslie Pickering Francis & John G. Francis - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):25-27.
    Rothstein (2010) argues that groups may be harmed by research on deidentified data. He concludes that researchers are obligated to minimize group harms and demonstrate respect for a studied group t...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7. International criminal courts, the rule of law, and the prevention of harm : building justice in times of injustice.Leslie P. Francis & John G. Francis - 2010 - In Larry May & Zachary Hoskins (eds.), International Criminal Law and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
  8.  22
    Sustaining Surveillance: The Importance of Information for Public Health.John G. Francis & Leslie P. Francis - 2021 - Springer Verlag.
    This book presents a comprehensive theory of the ethics and political philosophy of public health surveillance based on reciprocal obligations among surveillers, those under surveillance, and others potentially affected by surveillance practices. Public health surveillance aims to identify emerging health trends, population health trends, treatment efficacy, and methods of health promotion--all apparently laudatory goals. Nonetheless, as with anti-terrorism surveillance, public health surveillance raises complex questions about privacy, political liberty, and justice both of and in data use. Individuals and groups can (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. Stateless Crimes, Legitimacy, and International Criminal Law: The Case of Organ Trafficking. [REVIEW]Leslie P. Francis & John G. Francis - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (3):283-295.
    Organ trafficking and trafficking in persons for the purpose of organ transplantation are recognized as significant international problems. Yet these forms of trafficking are largely left out of international criminal law regimes and to some extent of domestic criminal law regimes as well. Trafficking of organs or persons for their organs does not come within the jurisdiction of the ICC, except in very special cases such as when conducted in a manner that conforms to the definitions of genocide or crimes (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations