21 found
Order:
See also
Profile: John Hadley
  1.  8
    Confining 'Disenhanced'Animals.John Hadley - 2012 - NanoEthics 6 (1):41-46.
    Abstract Drawing upon evolutionary theory and the work of Daniel Dennett and Nicholas Agar, I offer an argument for broadening discussion of the ethics of disenhancement beyond animal welfare concerns to a consideration of animal “biopreferences”. Short of rendering animals completely unconscious or decerebrate, it is reasonable to suggest that disenhanced animals will continue to have some preferences. To the extent that these preferences can be understood as what Agar refers to as “plausible naturalizations” for familiar moral concepts like beliefs (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  2. Nonhuman Animal Property: Reconciling Environmentalism and Animal Rights.John Hadley - 2005 - Journal of Social Philosophy 36 (3):305–315.
    In this paper I extend liberal property rights theory to nonhuman animals.I sketch an outline of a nonhuman animal property rights regime and argue that both proponents of animal rights and ecological holism ought to accept nonhuman animal property rights. To conclude I address a series of objections.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Animal Rights Extremism and the Terrorism Question.John Hadley - 2009 - Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (3):363-378.
    In this paper I extend orthodox just-war terrorism theory to the phenomenon of extremist violence on behalf of nonhuman animals.I argue that most documented cases of so-called animal rights extremism do not quality as terrorism.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  7
    Non-Autonomous Sentient Beings and Original Acquisition.John Hadley - 2017 - Analysis 77 (2):292-299.
    Libertarians concede that non-autonomous sentient beings pose a problem for their theory. But, while they acknowledge that libertarianism denies non-autonomous sentient beings basic moral rights, libertarians have overlooked how their theory also denies non-autonomous sentient beings basic moral powers. In this article, I show how the libertarian entitlement theory of justice, specifically, the theory for the original acquisition of holdings, denies non-autonomous sentient beings the moral power to originally acquire or make property. Attempts to avoid this problem by appealing to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Animal Rights and Self-Defense Theory.John Hadley - 2009 - Journal of Value Inquiry 43 (2):165-177.
    In this paper I bring together self-defense theory and animal rights theory. The extension of self-defense theory to animals poses a serious problem for proponents of animal rights. If, in line with orthodox self-defense theory, a person is a legitimate target for third-party self-defensive violence if they are responsible for a morally unjustified harm without an acceptable excuse; and if, in line with animal rights theory, people that consume animal products are responsible for unjustified harm to animals, then many millions, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  40
    The Duty to Aid Nonhuman Animals in Dire Need.John Hadley - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (4):445–451.
    abstract Most moral philosophers accept that we have obligations to provide at least some aid and assistance to distant strangers in dire need. Philosophers who extend rights and obligations to nonhuman animals, however, have been less than explicit about whether we have any positive duties to free‐roaming or ‘wild’ animals. I argue our obligations to free‐roaming nonhuman animals in dire need are essentially no different to those we have to severely cognitively impaired distant strangers. I address three objections to the (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  7.  3
    Telling It Like It Is: A Proposal to Improve Transparency in Biomedical Research.John Hadley - 2012 - Between the Species 15 (1):7.
    Recent proposals to improve public communication about animal-based biomedical research have been narrowly focused on reforming biomedical journal submission guidelines. My suggestion for communication reform is broader in scope reaching beyond the research community to healthcare communicators and ultimately the general public. The suggestion is for researchers to provide journalists and public relations practitioners with concise summaries of their ‘animal use data’. Animal use data is collected by researchers and intended for the public record but is rarely, if ever, given (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  6
    World Poverty, Animal Minds and the Ethics of Veterinary Expenditure.John Hadley & Siobhan O'Sullivan - 2009 - Environmental Values 18 (3):361-378.
    In this paper we make an argument for limiting veterinary expenditure on companion animals. The argument combines two principles: the obligation to give and the self-consciousness requirement. In line with the former, we ought to give money to organisations helping to alleviate preventable suffering and death in developing countries; the latter states that it is only intrinsically wrong to painlessly kill an individual that is self-conscious. Combined, the two principles inform an argument along the following lines: rather than spending inordinate (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9.  14
    Excluding Destruction.John Hadley - 2005 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (2):22-29.
    In this paper I argue that the potentially environmentally destructive scope of a libertarian property rights regime can be narrowed by applying reasonable limits to those rights. I will claim that excluding the right to destroy from the libertarian property rights bundle is consistent with self-ownership and Robert Nozick’s interpretation of the Lockean proviso.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  37
    Liberty and Valuing Sentient Life.John Hadley - 2013 - Ethics and the Environment 18 (1):87-103.
    In “Do Animals have an Interest in Liberty?” Alasdair Cochrane brings some much needed attention to the ethics of animal confinement (2009a). Of particular significance is the question of whether confinement in itself is bad for nonhuman animal (hereafter, animal) well-being. If confinement conditions cause animals to suffer or frustrate their preferences it is safe to assume that liberty or freedom (following Cochrane, I use the terms interchangeably) would be instrumentally good for them. But, what about seemingly benign conditions of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Paying Their Way: Dissident Opinion, Advertising and Access to the Public Sphere.John Hadley - 2010 - Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics 10 (1/2).
    In this paper I suggest practical measures that can address some familiar, and some not so familiar, commercial obstacles to increasing media coverage of dissident opinion.The kernel of my proposal is for media codes of practice and workplace norms to reflect an ethical distinction between different kinds of commercial speech.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  22
    Animal Rights and Moral Philosophy - by Julian H. Franklin.John Hadley - 2007 - Philosophical Books 48 (2):187-188.
  13.  25
    Critique of Callicott's Biosocial Moral Theory.John Hadley - 2007 - Ethics and the Environment 12 (1):67-78.
    : J. Baird Callicott's claim to have unified environmentalism and animal liberation should be rejected by holists and liberationists. By making relations of intimacy necessary for moral considerability, Callicott excludes from the moral community nonhuman animals unable to engage in intimate relations due to the circumstances of their confinement. By failing to afford moral protection to animals in factory farms and research laboratories, Callicott's biosocial moral theory falls short of meeting a basic moral demand of liberationists. Moreover, were Callicott to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  22
    Ethics and the Beast - by Tzachi Zamir.John Hadley - 2008 - Philosophical Books 49 (3):279-280.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  21
    Using and Abusing Others: A Reply to Machan. [REVIEW]John Hadley - 2004 - Journal of Value Inquiry 38 (3):411-414.
    In this paper I run a 'marginal cases' type argument against Machan's claim that moral agents ought to be able to use animals.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  9
    Moral Responsibility for Harming Animals.John Hadley - 2009 - Think.
    Third-party intervention has been the focus of recent debate in self-defense theory. When is it permissible for third-parties to intervene on behalf of an innocent victim facing an unjustified attack or threat? In line with recent self-defense theory, if an attacker is morally responsible for their actions and does not have an acceptable excuse then it is permissible for third-parties to use proportionate violence against them.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  1
    Moral Responsibility for Harming Animals: Hadley Moral Responsibility for Harming Animals.John Hadley - 2009 - Think 8 (22):51-55.
    Third-party intervention has been the focus of recent debate in self-defense theory. When is it permissible for third-parties to intervene on behalf of an innocent victim facing an unjustified attack or threat? In line with recent self-defense theory, if an attacker is morally responsible for their actions and does not have an acceptable excuse then it is permissible for third-parties to use proportionate violence against them.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Animal Ethics and Philosophy: Questioning the Orthodoxy.Elisa Aaltola & John Hadley (eds.) - 2014 - Rowman & Littlefield International.
    Bringing together new theory and critical perspectives on a broad range of topics in animal ethics, this book examines the implications of recent developments in the various fields that bear upon animal ethics. Showcasing a new generation of thinkers, it exposes some important shortcomings in existing animal rights theory.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Animal Ethics and Philosophy: Questioning the Orthodoxy.John Hadley & Elisa Aaltola (eds.) - 2014 - Rowman and Littlefield International.
    Bringing together new theory and critical perspectives on a broad range of topics in animal ethics, this book examines the implications of recent developments in the various fields that bear upon animal ethics. Showcasing a new generation of thinkers, it exposes some important shortcomings in existing animal rights theory.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Animal Property Rights: A Theory of Habitat Rights for Wild Animals.John Hadley - 2015 - Lexington Books.
    This book presents a theory of habitat rights for wild animals, positioning animal property rights within the existing institution of property and discussing the practical implications of giving property rights to animals.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. On Presence.John Hadley - 2005 - New Blackfriars 86 (1005):505-517.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography