6 found
Order:
  1.  80
    Mind, reason, and being-in-the-world: the McDowell-Dreyfus debate.Joseph K. Schear (ed.) - 2013 - New York: Routledge.
    John McDowell and Hubert L. Dreyfus are philosophers of world renown, whose work has decisively shaped the fields of analytic philosophy and phenomenology respectively. Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate opens with their debate over one of the most important and controversial subjects of philosophy: is human experience pervaded by conceptual rationality, or does experience mark the limits of reason? Is all intelligibility rational, or is there a form of intelligibility at work in our skilful bodily rapport with the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   43 citations  
  2. Judgment and Ontology in Heidegger’s Phenomenology.Joseph K. Schear - 2007 - New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 7:127-158. Translated by Joseph Schear.
  3.  34
    The Dissatisfactions of Self‐Consciousness.Joseph K. Schear - 2024 - European Journal of Philosophy 32 (3):919-925.
    Robert Pippin has long defended the Hegelian ‘satisfactions of self‐consciousness’ against virtually all attacks, including Heidegger's. He now concedes in a striking reversal that ‘Heidegger is right’. Pippin diagnoses his past allegiance to the Western rationalist tradition culminating in Hegel as resting on ‘a misplaced confidence in the inescapably self‐reflective character of any orientation or attunement to the meaningfulness of Being’. What were once the satisfactions of self‐consciousness have become its dissatisfactions. But does Pippin's presentation of the rationalist position ultimately (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  57
    Phenomenology and Metaphysics.Joseph K. Schear - 2015 - Philosophical Topics 43 (1-2):269-278.
    Moore claims, refreshingly, that Heidegger’s Being and Time is a metaphysical work. Moore also claims, strikingly, that Heidegger, indeed phenomenology more generally, would be better off dropping its metaphysical pretensions. Moore objects that phenomenology can have genuine metaphysical import only by incurring commitment to an untenable idealism. I defend Heidegger against this objection. Heideggerian phenomenology is metaphysical—it raises the question of, and makes commitments about, what it is for things to be—without any untenable idealism.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  38
    Editorial Statement.Joseph K. Schear - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (2):169-169.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  38
    25 years of EJP.Joseph K. Schear - 2018 - European Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):909-910.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark