Order:
  1.  9
    The Political Economy of Progress: John Stuart Mill and Modern Radicalism.Joseph Persky - 2016 - Oxford University Press USA.
    While there had been much radical thought before John Stuart Mill, Joseph Persky argues it was Mill, as he moved to the left, who provided the radical wing of liberalism with its first serious analytical foundation, a political economy of progress that still echoes today. A rereading of Mill's mature work suggests his theoretical understanding of accumulation led him to see laissez-faire capitalism as a transitional system. Deeply committed to the egalitarian precepts of the Enlightenment, Mill advocated gradualism and rejected (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  4
    Mill's Socialism Re-Examined.Joseph Persky - forthcoming - Utilitas:1-16.
    McCabe and Turner raise a number of perceptive points concerning my treatment of John Stuart Mill's political economy of progress and its relation to socialism. In giving context to their points this article first tries to clarify Mill's understanding of socialism as anchored in his positive classical economics. Mill the utilitarian philosopher endorses socialism, but he anticipates its arrival based on his materialist understanding of history. In this materialist context, the article argues that Mill expects the economy of worker cooperatives (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  84
    Rawls's Thin (Millean) Defense of Private Property.Joseph Persky - 2010 - Utilitas 22 (2):134-147.
    This article suggests that Rawls's break with early utilitarians is not so much over the greatest happiness principle as it is over the relation of the institution of private property to justice. In this respect Rawls is very close to John Stuart Mill, arguing for a cleansed or tamed version of the institution. That said, Rawls's defense of private property remains very thin and highly idealized, again following Mill. If Hume and Bentham fail to demonstrate their claims, Rawls and Mill (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations