69 found
Order:
  1.  90
    Probabilistic Models of Cognition: Exploring Representations and Inductive Biases.Thomas L. Griffiths, Nick Chater, Charles Kemp, Amy Perfors & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2010 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (8):357-364.
  2.  21
    Word Learning as Bayesian Inference.Fei Xu & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2007 - Psychological Review 114 (2):245-272.
  3.  72
    Theory-Based Bayesian Models of Inductive Learning and Reasoning.Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Thomas L. Griffiths & Charles Kemp - 2006 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (7):309-318.
  4.  11
    Topics in Semantic Representation.Thomas L. Griffiths, Mark Steyvers & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2007 - Psychological Review 114 (2):211-244.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   58 citations  
  5.  44
    Action Understanding as Inverse Planning.Chris L. Baker, Rebecca Saxe & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2009 - Cognition 113 (3):329-349.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   42 citations  
  6.  24
    The Learnability of Abstract Syntactic Principles.Amy Perfors, Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Terry Regier - 2011 - Cognition 118 (3):306-338.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  7. A Tutorial Introduction to Bayesian Models of Cognitive Development.Amy Perfors, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Thomas L. Griffiths & Fei Xu - 2011 - Cognition 120 (3):302-321.
  8.  10
    Theory-Based Causal Induction.Thomas L. Griffiths & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2009 - Psychological Review 116 (4):661-716.
  9.  54
    Generalization, Similarity, and Bayesian Inference.Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Thomas L. Griffiths - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):629-640.
    Shepard has argued that a universal law should govern generalization across different domains of perception and cognition, as well as across organisms from different species or even different planets. Starting with some basic assumptions about natural kinds, he derived an exponential decay function as the form of the universal generalization gradient, which accords strikingly well with a wide range of empirical data. However, his original formulation applied only to the ideal case of generalization from a single encountered stimulus to a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   71 citations  
  10.  35
    One and Done? Optimal Decisions From Very Few Samples.Edward Vul, Noah Goodman, Thomas L. Griffiths & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2014 - Cognitive Science 38 (4):599-637.
    In many learning or inference tasks human behavior approximates that of a Bayesian ideal observer, suggesting that, at some level, cognition can be described as Bayesian inference. However, a number of findings have highlighted an intriguing mismatch between human behavior and standard assumptions about optimality: People often appear to make decisions based on just one or a few samples from the appropriate posterior probability distribution, rather than using the full distribution. Although sampling-based approximations are a common way to implement Bayesian (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  11.  12
    Building Machines That Learn and Think Like People.Brenden M. Lake, Tomer D. Ullman, Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Samuel J. Gershman - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  12.  28
    The Naïve Utility Calculus: Computational Principles Underlying Commonsense Psychology.Julian Jara-Ettinger, Hyowon Gweon, Laura E. Schulz & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2016 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20 (8):589-604.
  13.  18
    The Large‐Scale Structure of Semantic Networks: Statistical Analyses and a Model of Semantic Growth.Mark Steyvers & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2005 - Cognitive Science 29 (1):41-78.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   45 citations  
  14.  5
    Structured Statistical Models of Inductive Reasoning.Charles Kemp & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2009 - Psychological Review 116 (1):20-58.
  15.  23
    Inferring Causal Networks From Observations and Interventions.Mark Steyvers, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers & Ben Blum - 2003 - Cognitive Science 27 (3):453-489.
  16. The Structure and Dynamics of Scientific Theories: A Hierarchical Bayesian Perspective.Leah Henderson, Noah D. Goodman, Joshua B. Tenenbaum & James F. Woodward - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (2):172-200.
    Hierarchical Bayesian models (HBMs) provide an account of Bayesian inference in a hierarchically structured hypothesis space. Scientific theories are plausibly regarded as organized into hierarchies in many cases, with higher levels sometimes called ‘paradigms’ and lower levels encoding more specific or concrete hypotheses. Therefore, HBMs provide a useful model for scientific theory change, showing how higher‐level theory change may be driven by the impact of evidence on lower levels. HBMs capture features described in the Kuhnian tradition, particularly the idea that (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  17.  47
    A Critical Period for Second Language Acquisition: Evidence From 2/3 Million English Speakers.Joshua K. Hartshorne, Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Steven Pinker - 2018 - Cognition 177:263-277.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  18.  24
    Modeling Human Performance in Statistical Word Segmentation.Michael C. Frank, Sharon Goldwater, Thomas L. Griffiths & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2010 - Cognition 117 (2):107-125.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  19.  7
    Children’s Understanding of the Costs and Rewards Underlying Rational Action.Julian Jara-Ettinger, Hyowon Gweon, Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Laura E. Schulz - 2015 - Cognition 140:14-23.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  20.  7
    The Logical Primitives of Thought: Empirical Foundations for Compositional Cognitive Models.Steven T. Piantadosi, Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Noah D. Goodman - 2016 - Psychological Review 123 (4):392-424.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  21.  4
    Learning a Theory of Causality.Noah D. Goodman, Tomer D. Ullman & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2011 - Psychological Review 118 (1):110-119.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  22.  7
    Learning a Commonsense Moral Theory.Max Kleiman-Weiner, Rebecca Saxe & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2017 - Cognition 167:107-123.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  23.  17
    Going Beyond the Evidence: Abstract Laws and Preschoolers’ Responses to Anomalous Data.Laura E. Schulz, Noah D. Goodman, Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Adrianna C. Jenkins - 2008 - Cognition 109 (2):211-223.
  24.  8
    The Role of Causality in Judgment Under Uncertainty.Tevye R. Krynski & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2007 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136 (3):430-450.
  25.  22
    The Imaginary Fundamentalists: The Unshocking Truth About Bayesian Cognitive Science.Nick Chater, Noah Goodman, Thomas L. Griffiths, Charles Kemp, Mike Oaksford & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (4):194-196.
    If Bayesian Fundamentalism existed, Jones & Love's (J&L's) arguments would provide a necessary corrective. But it does not. Bayesian cognitive science is deeply concerned with characterizing algorithms and representations, and, ultimately, implementations in neural circuits; it pays close attention to environmental structure and the constraints of behavioral data, when available; and it rigorously compares multiple models, both within and across papers. J&L's recommendation of Bayesian Enlightenment corresponds to past, present, and, we hope, future practice in Bayesian cognitive science.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  26.  51
    Learning to Learn Causal Models.Charles Kemp, Noah D. Goodman & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2010 - Cognitive Science 34 (7):1185-1243.
    Learning to understand a single causal system can be an achievement, but humans must learn about multiple causal systems over the course of a lifetime. We present a hierarchical Bayesian framework that helps to explain how learning about several causal systems can accelerate learning about systems that are subsequently encountered. Given experience with a set of objects, our framework learns a causal model for each object and a causal schema that captures commonalities among these causal models. The schema organizes the (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  27.  40
    Bootstrapping in a Language of Thought: A Formal Model of Numerical Concept Learning.Steven T. Piantadosi, Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Noah D. Goodman - 2012 - Cognition 123 (2):199-217.
  28.  8
    The Emergence of Organizing Structure in Conceptual Representation.Brenden M. Lake, Neil D. Lawrence & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2018 - Cognitive Science 42 (S3):809-832.
    Both scientists and children make important structural discoveries, yet their computational underpinnings are not well understood. Structure discovery has previously been formalized as probabilistic inference about the right structural form—where form could be a tree, ring, chain, grid, etc.. Although this approach can learn intuitive organizations, including a tree for animals and a ring for the color circle, it assumes a strong inductive bias that considers only these particular forms, and each form is explicitly provided as initial knowledge. Here we (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  29.  3
    “Structured Statistical Models of Inductive Reasoning”: Correction.Charles Kemp & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2009 - Psychological Review 116 (2):461-461.
  30.  36
    Three Ideal Observer Models for Rule Learning in Simple Languages.Michael C. Frank & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2011 - Cognition 120 (3):360-371.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  31.  27
    Intuitive Theories as Grammars for Causal Inference.Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Thomas L. Griffiths & Sourabh Niyogi - 2007 - In Alison Gopnik & Laura Schulz (eds.), Causal Learning: Psychology, Philosophy, and Computation. Oxford University Press. pp. 301--322.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  32.  4
    The Naïve Utility Calculus: Computational Principles Underlying Commonsense Psychology.Julian Jara-Ettinger, Hyowon Gweon, Laura E. Schulz & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2016 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20 (10):785.
  33.  19
    A Probabilistic Model of Theory Formation.Charles Kemp, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Sourabh Niyogi & Thomas L. Griffiths - 2010 - Cognition 114 (2):165-196.
  34.  17
    From Mere Coincidences to Meaningful Discoveries.Thomas L. Griffiths & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2007 - Cognition 103 (2):180-226.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  35.  32
    Two Proposals for Causal Grammars.Thomas L. Griffiths & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2007 - In Alison Gopnik & Laura Schulz (eds.), Causal Learning: Psychology, Philosophy, and Computation. Oxford University Press. pp. 323--345.
  36.  46
    Probabilistic Models of Cognition: Where Next?Nick Chater, Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Alan Yuille - 2006 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (7):292-293.
  37.  14
    A Probabilistic Model of Cross-Categorization.Patrick Shafto, Charles Kemp, Vikash Mansinghka & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2011 - Cognition 120 (1):1-25.
  38.  9
    Lucky or Clever? From Expectations to Responsibility Judgments.Tobias Gerstenberg, Tomer D. Ullman, Jonas Nagel, Max Kleiman-Weiner, David A. Lagnado & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2018 - Cognition 177:122-141.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  39.  5
    A Probabilistic Model of Visual Working Memory: Incorporating Higher Order Regularities Into Working Memory Capacity Estimates.Timothy F. Brady & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2013 - Psychological Review 120 (1):85-109.
  40.  18
    Inductive Reasoning About Causally Transmitted Properties.Patrick Shafto, Charles Kemp, Elizabeth Baraff Bonawitz, John D. Coley & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2008 - Cognition 109 (2):175-192.
  41.  2
    Inferring Mass in Complex Scenes by Mental Simulation.Jessica B. Hamrick, Peter W. Battaglia, Thomas L. Griffiths & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2016 - Cognition 157:61-76.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  42.  22
    Rational Inference of Beliefs and Desires From Emotional Expressions.Yang Wu, Chris L. Baker, Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Laura E. Schulz - 2018 - Cognitive Science 42 (3):850-884.
    We investigated people's ability to infer others’ mental states from their emotional reactions, manipulating whether agents wanted, expected, and caused an outcome. Participants recovered agents’ desires throughout. When the agent observed, but did not cause the outcome, participants’ ability to recover the agent's beliefs depended on the evidence they got. When the agent caused the event, participants’ judgments also depended on the probability of the action ; when actions were improbable given the mental states, people failed to recover the agent's (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  43.  40
    Bayes and Blickets: Effects of Knowledge on Causal Induction in Children and Adults.Thomas L. Griffiths, David M. Sobel, Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Alison Gopnik - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (8):1407-1455.
    People are adept at inferring novel causal relations, even from only a few observations. Prior knowledge about the probability of encountering causal relations of various types and the nature of the mechanisms relating causes and effects plays a crucial role in these inferences. We test a formal account of how this knowledge can be used and acquired, based on analyzing causal induction as Bayesian inference. Five studies explored the predictions of this account with adults and 4-year-olds, using tasks in which (...)
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  44. Cause and Intent: Social Reasoning in Causal Learning.Noah D. Goodman, Chris L. Baker & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2009 - In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. pp. 2759--2764.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  45.  23
    Learning Causal Schemata.Charles Kemp, Noah D. Goodman & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2007 - In McNamara D. S. & Trafton J. G. (eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society. pp. 389--394.
  46.  12
    Inferring the Intentional States of Autonomous Virtual Agents.Peter C. Pantelis, Chris L. Baker, Steven A. Cholewiak, Kevin Sanik, Ari Weinstein, Chia-Chien Wu, Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Jacob Feldman - 2014 - Cognition 130 (3):360-379.
  47. Informative Communication in Word Production and Word Learning.Michael C. Frank, Noah D. Goodman, Peter Lai & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2009 - In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  48.  10
    Predicting the Future as Bayesian Inference: People Combine Prior Knowledge with Observations When Estimating Duration and Extent.Thomas L. Griffiths & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2011 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 140 (4):725-743.
  49.  19
    Dynamical Causal Learning.David Danks, Thomas L. Griffiths & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - unknown
    Current psychological theories of human causal learning and judgment focus primarily on long-run predictions: two by estimating parameters of a causal Bayes nets, and a third through structural learning. This paper focuses on people’s short-run behavior by examining dynamical versions of these three theories, and comparing their predictions to a real-world dataset.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  50.  13
    Encoding Higher-Order Structure in Visual Working Memory: A Probabilistic Model.Timothy F. Brady & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2010 - In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society. pp. 411--416.
1 — 50 / 69