27 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Joshua C. Thurow [23]Joshua Thurow [4]
See also
Joshua C. Thurow
University of Texas at San Antonio
  1. Does Cognitive Science Show Belief in God to Be Irrational? The Epistemic Consequences of the Cognitive Science of Religion.Joshua C. Thurow - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):77-98.
    The last 15 years or so has seen the development of a fascinating new area of cognitive science: the cognitive science of religion (CSR). Scientists in this field aim to explain religious beliefs and various other religious human activities by appeal to basic cognitive structures that all humans possess. The CSR scientific theories raise an interesting philosophical question: do they somehow show that religious belief, more specifically belief in a god of some kind, is irrational? In this paper I investigate (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  2. The a Priori Defended: A Defense of the Generality Argument.Joshua C. Thurow - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 146 (2):273-289.
    One of Laurence BonJour’s main arguments for the existence of the a priori is an argument that a priori justification is indispensable for making inferences from experience to conclusions that go beyond experience. This argument has recently come under heavy fire from Albert Casullo, who has dubbed BonJour’s argument, “The Generality Argument.” In this paper I (i) defend the Generality Argument against Casullo’s criticisms, and (ii) develop a new, more plausible, version of the Generality Argument in response to some other (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  3. Moral Intuitionism Defeated?Nathan Ballantyne & Joshua C. Thurow - 2013 - American Philosophical Quarterly 50 (4):411-422.
    Walter Sinnott-Armstrong has developed and progressively refined an argument against moral intuitionism—the view on which some moral beliefs enjoy non-inferential justification. He has stated his argument in a few different forms, but the basic idea is straightforward. To start with, Sinnott-Armstrong highlights facts relevant to the truth of moral beliefs: such beliefs are sometimes biased, influenced by various irrelevant factors, and often subject to disagreement. Given these facts, Sinnott-Armstrong infers that many moral beliefs are false. What then shall we think (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  4. The Defeater Version of Benacerraf’s Problem for a Priori Knowledge.Joshua C. Thurow - 2013 - Synthese 190 (9):1587-1603.
    Paul Benacerraf’s argument that mathematical realism is apparently incompatible with mathematical knowledge has been widely thought to also show that a priori knowledge in general is problematic. Although many philosophers have rejected Benacerraf’s argument because it assumes a causal theory of knowledge, some maintain that Benacerraf nevertheless put his finger on a genuine problem, even though he didn’t state the problem in its most challenging form. After diagnosing what went wrong with Benacerraf’s argument, I argue that a new, more challenging, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  5. On Counterfactuals of Libertarian Freedom: Is There Anything I Would Have Done If I Could Have Done Otherwise?Paul C. Anders, Joshua C. Thurow & Kenneth Hochstetter - 2014 - American Philosophical Quarterly 51 (1):85-94.
  6.  56
    Experientially Defeasible a Priori Justification.Joshua Thurow - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225):596–602.
    In his recent book Albert Casullo rejects the claim that if a belief is defeasible by non-experiential evidence then it is defeasible by experiential evidence. This claim is a crucial premise in a simple argument for the experiential defeasibility of a priori justification. I defend the premise against Casullo's objection, the main problem with which is that he does not take into account the evidential role of multiple corroborating sources of testimony. I conclude that the crucial premise is true and (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  7. Does Religious Disagreement Actually Aid the Case for Theism?Joshua Thurow - 2012 - In Jake Chandler & Victoria Harrison (eds.), Probability in the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press.
  8. Jesse Bering, The God Instinct: The Psychology of Souls, Destiny, and the Meaning of Life, Nicholas Brealey Publishing, 2011.Joshua C. Thurow - 2013 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 5 (3):196-202.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. Some Reflections on Cognitive Science, Doubt, and Religious Belief.Joshua C. Thurow - 2014 - In Justin Barrett Roger Trigg (ed.), The Root of Religion. Ashgate.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  10. Does the Scientific Study of Religion Cast Doubt on Theistic Belief?Joshua C. Thurow - 2014 - In Michael Bergmann Patrick Kain (ed.), Challenges to Moral and Religious Belief. Oxford University Press. pp. 277-294.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  11.  15
    Intuition Theory of the A Priori, with Implications for Experimental Philosophy.Joshua C. Thurow - 2013 - In Albert Casullo & Joshua C. Thurow (eds.), The a Priori in Philosophy. Oxford University Press. pp. 67.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12.  10
    Problems with Compensation: Gleeson on Marilyn McCord Adams on Evil.Joshua C. Thurow - forthcoming - Sophia:1-12.
    According to the most recent articulation of her view, Marilyn Adams’s reply to the problem of horrendous evils states that God offers compensation to those who experience horrendous evils. This compensation includes the good of the incarnation of God and the good of identification with God in virtue of suffering horrendous evils. Andrew Gleeson has raised a series of objections to Adams’s recent articulation. I argue that all of Gleeson’s arguments fail or fail to pose a distinct challenge. I then (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  44
    Atoning in Purgatory.Joshua C. Thurow - 2017 - Religious Studies 53 (2):217-237.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  14
    Debunking and Fully Apt Belief.Joshua C. Thurow - 2018 - Filosofia Unisinos 19 (3).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  18
    Animals with Soul.Joshua Thurow - 2018 - Sophia 57 (1):85-101.
    I argue that ensouled animalism—the view that we are identical to animals that have immaterial souls as parts—has a pair of advantages over its two nearest rivals, materialistic animalism and pure dualism. Contra pure dualism, ensouled animalism can explain how physical predications can be literally true of us. Contra materialistic animalism, ensouled animalism can explain how animals can survive death. Furthermore, ensouled animalism has these advantages without creating any problems beyond those already faced by animalism and by belief in souls. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  23
    Evolutionary Religion, Written by J. L. Schellenberg.Joshua C. Thurow - 2016 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 6 (4):418-421.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  42
    Christian Philosophical Theology. [REVIEW]Joshua C. Thurow - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (1):113-116.
  18.  16
    Evolutionary Religion, Written by J. L. Schellenberg.Joshua C. Thurow - 2016 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 6 (4):418-421.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  20
    Natural Signs and Knowledge of God: A New Look at Theistic Arguments, by C. Stephen Evans.Joshua C. Thurow - 2013 - Faith and Philosophy 30 (2):221-224.
  20.  10
    A Natural History of Natural Theology, by Helen De Cruz and Johan De Smedt. [REVIEW]Joshua C. Thurow - 2016 - Faith and Philosophy 33 (3):370-374.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  8
    Finding Collective Sin and Recompense in Anselm’s Cur Deus Homo.Joshua C. Thurow - 2017 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3):431-446.
    Anselm’s argument in Cur Deus Homo commits him to the existence of collective sin and to Jesus’s offering recompense for the human race’s collective sin. By “collective sin” I mean sin of a collective entity—in this case, the human race. In the bulk of this paper I argue that one of Anselm’s defenses of a crucial assumption of his argument—what I call Anselm’s Principle—can succeed only on the assumption that Jesus offers recompense for the collective sin of the human race. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  11
    Evolutionary Religion. [REVIEW]Joshua C. Thurow - 2016 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 6 (4).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  3
    The Realm of Reason.Joshua C. Thurow - 2006 - Philosophia Christi 8 (1):169-172.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  5
    Christian Philosophical Theology. [REVIEW]Joshua C. Thurow - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (1):113-116.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. Book Review. [REVIEW]Joshua C. Thurow - 2006 - Philosophia Christi 8 (1):169-171.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. Communal Substitutionary Atonement.Joshua Thurow - 2015 - Journal of Analytic Theology 3:47-69.
    In this paper I develop and defend a new theory of the Atonement - the Communal Substitution Theory. According to the Communal Substitution Theory, by dying on the cross Jesus either takes on the punishment for, or offers satisfaction for, the sins of the human community. Individual humans have sinned, but human communities have sinned as well. Jesus dies for the communal sins. As a result, human communities are forgiven and reconciled to God, and through the event of communal forgiveness, (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27. Religion, 'Religion', and Tolerance.Joshua C. Thurow - 2013 - In Steve Clark Russell Powell & Julian Savulescu (eds.), Religion, Intolerance, and Conflict: A Scientific and Conceptual Investigation. Oxford University Press. pp. 146-162.