Order:
See also
  1.  9
    Are We Essentially Animals?Joungbin Lim - 2019 - Philosophical Forum 50 (3):383-409.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  13
    The Incompatibility of Animalism and Eliminativism.Joungbin Lim - 2017 - Philosophical Forum 48 (4):395-407.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3.  12
    In Defense of Physicalist Christology.Joungbin Lim - forthcoming - Sophia:1-16.
    Physicalist Christology is the view that God the Son, in the Incarnation, became identical with the body of Jesus. The goal of this paper is to defend PC from two recent objections. One is that if GS is a physical object, then he cannot have properties had by God. Then, by Leibniz’s law, the incarnate GS cannot be identical with the second Person of the Trinity. The other objection is that PC implies that the incarnate GS did not exist in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  27
    Is Mathematical Knowledge a Precedent for Modal Knowledge?: A Novel Objection to Lewis’s Modal Epistemology.Joungbin Lim - 2018 - SATS 19 (2):183-199.
    Journal Name: SATS Issue: Ahead of print.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  33
    Derivative Properties and the Too Many Thinkers Problem.Joungbin Lim - 2014 - Metaphysica 15 (2).
  6.  20
    Strategy for Animalism.Joungbin Lim - 2018 - Axiomathes 28 (4):419-433.
    The central argument for animalism is the thinking animal problem : if you are not an animal, there are two thinkers within the region you occupy, i.e., you and your animal body. This is absurd. So you are an animal. The main objection to this argument is the thinking brain problem : animalism faces a problem that is structurally analogous to TAP. Specifically, if animalism is true, you and your brain both think. This is absurd. So animalism is false. The (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  56
    Naturalistic Epistemology, Normativity, and Self.Joungbin Lim - 2010 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:171-182.
    In this paper, I criticize naturalized epistemology. To this end, I critically examine several versions of naturalistic epistemology (Quine, Kornblith, and Plantinga). While Quine’s epistemology eschews any kind of normativity not invoked in science, Kornblith’s and Plantinga’s views attempt to explain normativity in the light of descriptivity. I provide an argument against them. The upshot of my argument is that since we are self-conscious beings, we have reflective ability to see what we ought to believe. In other words, the fact (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  38
    Dualism, Physicalism, and the Passion of the Christ.Joungbin Lim - 2010 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 45:185-197.
    My project in this paper is to provide a plausible idea of Christ’s suffering and death in terms of two theories of the human person. One is dualism. Dualism is the view that a human person is composed of two substances, that is, a soul and a body, and he (strictly speaking) is identical with the soul. On the other hand, physicalism is the view that a human person is numerically identical with his body. I will argue that dualism is (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  17
    Physicalism and Neo-Lockeanism About Persons.Joungbin Lim - 2016 - Philosophical Psychology 29 (8):1229-1240.
    The central objection to neo-Lockeanism about persons is the too many thinkers problem: NLP ends up with an absurd multiplication of thinkers. Sydney Shoemaker attempts to solve this problem by arguing that the person and the animal do not share all of the same physical properties. This, according to him, leads to the idea that mental properties are realized in the person’s physical properties only. The project of this paper is to reject Shoemaker’s physicalist solution to the too many thinkers (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark