7 found
Order:
  1.  42
    Normative Data on the N-Back Task for Children and Young Adolescents.Santiago Pelegrina, M. Teresa Lechuga, Juan A. García-Madruga, M. Rosa Elosúa, Pedro Macizo, Manuel Carreiras, Luis J. Fuentes & M. Teresa Bajo - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  2.  13
    The Comprehension of Counterfactual Conditionals: Evidence From Eye-Tracking in the Visual World Paradigm.Isabel Orenes, Juan A. García-Madruga, Isabel Gómez-Veiga, Orlando Espino & Ruth M. J. Byrne - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3.  56
    Reasoning From Double Conditionals: The Effects of Logical Structure and Believability.Carlos Santamaria, Juan A. Garcia-Madruga & Philip N. Johnson-Laird - 1998 - Thinking and Reasoning 4 (2):97-122.
    We report three experimental studies of reasoning with double conditionals, i.e. problems based on premises of the form: If A then B. If B then C. where A, B, and C, describe everyday events. We manipulated both the logical structure of the problems, using all four possible arrangements (or “figures” of their constituents, A, B, and C, and the believability of the two salient conditional conclusions that might follow from them, i.e. If A then C, or If C then A. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  4.  14
    Executive Functions and the Improvement of Thinking Abilities: The Intervention in Reading Comprehension.Juan A. García-Madruga, Isabel Gómez-Veiga & José Ó Vila - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5.  48
    Activation of End-Terms in Syllogistic Reasoning.Orlando Espino, Carlos Santamaria & Juan A. Garcia-Madruga - 2000 - Thinking and Reasoning 6 (1):67 – 89.
    We report five experiments showing that the activation of the end-terms of a syllogism is determined by their position in the composite model of the premises. We show that it is not determined by the position of the terms in the rule being applied (Ford, 1994), by the syntactic role of the terms in the premises (Polk & Newell, 1995; Wetherick & Gilhooly, 1990), by the type of conclusion (Chater & Oaksford, 1999), or by the terms from the source premise (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  6.  37
    Mental Models in Propositional Reasoning and Working Memory's Central Executive.José O. Vila, José M. Luzón, Nuria Carriedo, Francisco Gutiérrez & Juan A. García-Madruga - 2007 - Thinking and Reasoning 13 (4):370-393.
  7.  13
    Theories of Reasoning and the Representational Level: A Reply to Oaksford.Carlos Santamaría, Orlando Espino & Juan A. García-Madruga - 2001 - Thinking and Reasoning 7 (2):209-213.