145 found
Order:
  1. Born Free and Equal? A Philosophical Inquiry Into the Nature of Discrimination.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2013 - New York: Oxford University Press.
    This book addresses these three issues: What is discrimination?; What makes it wrong?; What should be done about wrongful discrimination? It argues: that there are different concepts of discrimination; that discrimination is not always morally wrong and that when it is, it is so primarily because of its harmful effects.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   55 citations  
  2.  30
    Relational Egalitarianism: Living as Equals.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2018 - Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
    Over the last twenty years, many political philosophers have rejected the idea that justice is fundamentally about distribution. Rather, justice is about social relations, and the so-called distributive paradigm should be replaced by a new relational paradigm. Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen seeks to describe, refine, and assess these thoughts and to propose a comprehensive form of egalitarianism which includes central elements from both relational and distributive paradigms. He shows why many of the challenges that luck egalitarianism faces reappear, once we try to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  3.  48
    Luck Egalitarianism.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2015 - London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen tackles all the major questions concerning luck egalitarianism, providing deep, penetrating and original discussion of recent academic discourses on distributive justice as well as responses to some of the main objections in the literature. It offers a new answer to the “Why equality?” and “Equality of what?” questions, and provides a robust luck egalitarian response to the recent criticisms of luck egalitarianism by social relations egalitarians. This systematic, theoretical introduction illustrates the broader picture of distributive justice and enables (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  4.  60
    Praising Without Standing.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2022 - The Journal of Ethics 26 (2):229-246.
    Philosophers analyzing standing to blame have argued that in view of a blamer’s own fault she can lack standing to blame another for an act even if the act is blameworthy and that standingless, hypocritical blame is pro tanto morally wrongful. The bearing of these conclusions on standing to praise is yet to receive the attention it deserves. I defend two claims. The first is the conditional claim that if and are true, so are and. The latter are: a praiser (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  5.  96
    Why the moral equality account of the hypocrite’s lack of standing to blame fails.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2020 - Analysis 80 (4):666-674.
    It is commonly believed that blamees can dismiss hypocritical blame on the ground that the hypocrite has no standing to blame their target. Many believe that the feature of hypocritical blame that undermines standing to blame is that it involves an implicit denial of the moral equality of persons. After all, the hypocrite treats herself better than her blamee for no good reason. In the light of the complement to hypocrites and a comparison of hypocritical and non-hypocritical blamers subscribing to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  6. The badness of discrimination.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (2):167-185.
    The most blatant forms of discrimination are morally outrageous and very obviously so; but the nature and boundaries of discrimination are more controversial, and it is not clear whether all forms of discrimination are morally bad; nor is it clear why objectionable cases of discrimination are bad. In this paper I address these issues. First, I offer a taxonomy of discrimination. I then argue that discrimination is bad, when it is, because it harms people. Finally, I criticize a rival, disrespect-based (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   48 citations  
  7.  62
    Relational egalitarianism and moral unequals.Andreas Bengtson & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2023 - Journal of Political Philosophy:1-24.
    Relational egalitarianism says that moral equals should relate as equals. We explore how moral unequals should relate.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  8. Egalitarianism, option luck, and responsibility.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2001 - Ethics 111 (3):548-579.
  9.  64
    Why the all-affected principle is groundless.Andreas Bengtson & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2021 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 18 (6):571-596.
    The all-affected principle is a widely accepted solution to the problem of constituting the demos. Despite its popularity, a basic question in relation to the principle has not received much attention: why does the fact that an individual is affected by a certain decision ground a right to inclusion in democratic decision-making about that matter? An answer to this question must include a reason that explains why an affected individual should be included because she is affected. We identify three such (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  10. “We are all Different”: Statistical Discrimination and the Right to be Treated as an Individual.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2011 - The Journal of Ethics 15 (1-2):47-59.
    There are many objections to statistical discrimination in general and racial profiling in particular. One objection appeals to the idea that people have a right to be treated as individuals. Statistical discrimination violates this right because, presumably, it involves treating people simply on the basis of statistical facts about groups to which they belong while ignoring non-statistical evidence about them. While there is something to this objection—there are objectionable ways of treating others that seem aptly described as failing to treat (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  11. Egalitarianism: new essays on the nature and value of equality.Nils Holtug & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (eds.) - 2007 - New York: Clarendon Press.
    The contributors to the volume are: Richard Arneson, Linda Barclay, Thomas Christiano, Nils Holtug, Susan Hurley, Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen, Dennis McKerlie, ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  12.  32
    Wrongful Discrimination Without Equal, Basic Moral Status.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2022 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 26 (1):19-36.
    Many theorists think that discrimination is wrongful because it involves treating discriminatees as if they have a lower moral status than others when in fact all people are moral equals. However, there are strong reasons, expounded by Peter Singer and others, to doubt that all people are indeed moral equals. While it may turn out that, ultimately, these reasons can be shown to be unsound, we cannot rule out the possibility that we are not all moral equals. If we are (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  13.  40
    The Problem(s) of Constituting the Demos: A (Set of) Solution.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen & Andreas Bengtson - 2021 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24 (4):1021-1031.
    When collective decisions should be made democratically, which people form the relevant demos? Many theorists think this question is an embarrassment to democratic theory: because any decision about who forms the demos must be made democratically by the right demos, which itself must be democratically constituted and so on ad infinitum; and because neither the concept of democracy, nor our reasons for caring about democracy, determine who should form the demos. Having distinguished between these three versions of the demos problem, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  14. Against self-ownership: There are no fact-insensitive ownership rights over one's body.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2008 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 36 (1):86–118.
  15. Luck egalitarians versus relational egalitarians: on the prospects of a pluralist account of egalitarian justice.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2015 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (2):220-241.
    Pluralist egalitarians think that luck and relational egalitarianism each articulates a component in a pluralist account of egalitarian justice. However, this ecumenical view appears problematic in the light of Elizabeth Anderson's claim that the divide arises because two incompatible views of justification are in play, which in turn generates derivative disagreements – e.g. about the proper currency of egalitarian justice. In support of pluralist egalitarianism I argue that two of Anderson's derivative disagreements are not rooted in the disagreement over justification (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  16. Nothing personal: On statistical discrimination.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2007 - Journal of Political Philosophy 15 (4):385–403.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  17. Can Relational Egalitarians Supply Both an Account of Justice and an Account of the Value of Democracy or Must They Choose Which?Andreas Bengtson & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - forthcoming - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy.
    Construed as a theory of justice, relational egalitarianism says that justice requires that people relate as equals. Construed as a theory of what makes democracy valuable, it says that democracy is a necessary, or constituent, part of the value of relating as equals. Typically, relational egalitarians want their theory to provide both an account of what justice requires and an account of what makes democracy valuable. We argue that relational egalitarians with this dual ambition face the justice-democracy dilemma: Understanding social (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Does overruling Roe discriminate against women (of colour)?Joona Räsänen, Claire Gothreau & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (12):952-956.
    On 24 July 2022, the landmark decision Roe v. Wade (1973), that secured a right to abortion for decades, was overruled by the US Supreme Court. The Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organisation severely restricts access to legal abortion care in the USA, since it will give the states the power to ban abortion. It has been claimed that overruling Roe will have disproportionate impacts on women of color and that restricting access to abortion contributes to or (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  19.  48
    Nothing Personal: On Statistical Discrimination.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2007 - Journal of Political Philosophy 15 (4):385-403.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  20. The Benefits of Injustice and Its Correction: A Challenge to the Duty Not to Benefit Innocently from Injustice.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2021 - Wiley: Journal of Political Philosophy 30 (3):395-408.
    Journal of Political Philosophy, Volume 30, Issue 3, Page 395-408, September 2022.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  21. The Benefits of Injustice and Its Correction: A Challenge to the Duty Not to Benefit Innocently from Injustice.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2021 - Wiley: Journal of Political Philosophy 30 (3):395-408.
    Journal of Political Philosophy, Volume 30, Issue 3, Page 395-408, September 2022.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  22.  25
    Is there a duty not to compound injustice?Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2022 - Law and Philosophy 42 (2):93-113.
    In a series of excellent, recent papers, Deborah Hellman expounds the intuitively appealing idea that we have a duty not to compound injustice. Roughly, one compounds injustice when facts that obtain as a result of prior injustice form part of one’s reason for imposing further disadvantages on the victims of this prior injustice. This article identifies several complexities and problems motivating various amendments to Hellman’s formulation of the duty not to compound injustice. Critically, it argues that the intuitions she and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  23.  20
    Age change, official age and fairness in health.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen & Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (9):634-635.
    In a recent JME article, Joona Räsänen makes the case for allowing legal age change. We identify three problems with his argument and, on that basis, propose an improved version thereof. Unfortunately, even the improved argument is vulnerable to the objection that chronological age is a better proxy for justice in health than both legal and what we shall call official age.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  24.  29
    Neuro-Doping and Fairness.Thomas Søbirk Petersen & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2020 - Neuroethics 14 (2):179-190.
    In this article, we critically discuss different versions of the fairness objection to the legalisation of neuro-doping. According to this objection, legalising neuro-doping will result in some enjoying an unfair advantage over others. Basically, we assess four versions. These focus on: 1) the unequal opportunities of winning for athletes who use neuro-doping and for those who do not; 2) the unfair advantages specifically for wealthy athletes; 3) the unfairness of athletic advantages not derived from athletes’ own training ; and 4) (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  25.  15
    Wrongful discrimination against non-pregnant people?Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen, Andreas Bengtson & Hugo Cosette-Lefebvre - 2023 - Journal of Medical Ethics 50 (1):26-27.
    Heloise Robinson argues that pregnant women have a higher moral status than non-pregnant persons and that, for this reason, pregnant women ought to be treated ‘noticeably’ better than non-pregnant persons. 1 In this commentary, we present two challenges to Robinson’s argument. First, the compounding disadvantage objection: treating involuntarily, non-pregnant women worse than voluntarily pregnant women unjustly compounds their disadvantage. Second, the identity objection: treating non-pregnant people worse than pregnant people amounts to pro tanto wrongful discrimination based on a fundamental aspect (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  26. An introduction to contemporary egalitarianism.Nils Holtug & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2006 - In Nils Holtug & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (eds.), Egalitarianism: New Essays on the Nature and Value of Equality. Clarendon Press. pp. 1--37.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  27.  46
    Out of Proportion? On Surveillance and the Proportionality Requirement.Kira Vrist Rønn & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2020 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 23 (1):181-199.
    In this article, we critically scrutinize the principle of proportionality when used in the context of security and government surveillance. We argue that McMahan’s distinction from just warfare between narrow proportionality and wide proportionality can generally apply to the context of surveillance. We argue that narrow proportionality applies more or less directly to cases in which the surveilled is liable and that the wide proportionality principle applies to cases characterized by ‘collateral intrusion’. We argue, however, that a more demanding criterion (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  28.  54
    Is it unjust that elderly people suffer from poorer health than young people? Distributive and relational egalitarianism on age-based health inequalities.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2019 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 18 (2):145-164.
    In any normal population, health is unequally distributed across different age groups. Are such age-based health inequalities unjust? A divide has recently developed within egalitarian theories of...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  29.  72
    Affirmative Action, Historical Injustice, and the Concept of Beneficiaries.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2016 - Journal of Political Philosophy 25 (1):72-90.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  30. Racial profiling versus community.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (2):191–205.
    abstract A police technique known as racial profiling draws on statistical beliefs about crime rates in racial groups. Supposing that such beliefs are true, and that racial profiling is effective in fighting crime, is such profiling morally justified? Recently, Risse and Zeckhauser have explored the racial profiling of African‐Americans and argued that justification is forthcoming from a utilitarian as well as deontological point of view. Drawing on criticisms made by G. A. Cohen of the incentives argument for inequality, I argue (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  31.  7
    Does harm or disrespect make discrimination wrong? An experimental approach.Andreas Albertsen, Bjørn G. Hallsson, Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen & Viki M. L. Pedersen - forthcoming - Philosophical Psychology.
    While standard forms of discrimination are widely considered morally wrong, philosophers disagree about what makes them so. Two accounts have risen to prominence in this debate: One stressing how wrongful discrimination disrespects the discriminatee, the other how the harms involved make discrimination wrong. While these accounts are based on carefully constructed thought experiments, proponents of both sides see their positions as in line with and, in part, supported by the folk theory of the moral wrongness of discrimination. This article presents (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  32. The Routledge Handbook of the Ethics of Discrimination.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (ed.) - 2017 - New York: Routledge.
    While it has many connections to other topics in normative and applied ethics, discrimination is a central subject in philosophy in its own right. It plays a significant role in relation to many real-life complaints about unjust treatment or unjust inequalities, and it raises a number of questions in political and moral philosophy, and in legal theory. Some of these questions include: what distinguishes the concept of discrimination from the concept of differential treatment? What distinguishes direct from indirect discrimination? Is (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  33.  57
    Relational Sufficientarianism and Frankfurt’s Objections to Equality.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2020 - The Journal of Ethics 25 (1):81-106.
    This article presents two rejoinders to Frankfurt’s arguments against egalitarianism. In developing the first, I introduce a novel relational view of justice: relational sufficiency. This is the view that justice requires us to relate to one another as people with sufficient, but not necessarily equal, standing. I argue that if Frankfurt’s objections to distributive equality are sound, so are analogous objections to relational equality. However, in a range of cases involving comparative justice we should be relational egalitarians, not relational sufficientarians, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  34.  11
    A Duty not to Remain Silent: Hypocrisy and the Lack of Standing not to Blame.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2023 - Philosophical Quarterly 73 (4):933-949.
    A notable feature of our practice of blaming is that blamees can dismiss blame for their own blameworthy actions when the blamer is censuring them hypocritically and, as it is often put, lacks standing to blame them as a result. This feature has received a good deal of philosophical attention in recent years. By contrast, no attention has been given the possibility that, likewise, refraining from blaming can be hypocritical and dismissed as standingless. I argue that hypocritical refrainers have a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  35.  91
    Moral Status and the Impermissibility of Minimizing Violations.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 1996 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 25 (4):333-351.
  36. Identification and responsibility.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2003 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (4):349-376.
    Real-self accounts of moral responsibility distinguish between various types of motivational elements. They claim that an agent is responsible for acts suitably related to elements that constitute the agent's real self. While such accounts have certain advantages from a compatibilist perspective, they are problematic in various ways. First, in it, authority and authenticity conceptions of the real self are often inadequately distinguished. Both of these conceptions inform discourse on identification, but only the former is relevant to moral responsibility. Second, authority (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  37.  17
    Making Sense of Affirmative Action.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2020 - Oup Usa.
    In this book Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen address the complexities of his question "Is affirmative action morally justifiable?" by analyzing the prevailing contemporary arguments both for and against affirmative action. The book applies current political philosophy to demonstrate that arguments on both sides justify different conclusions given different specific cases, though it ultimately does argue in favor of affirmative action based on the relative strength and significance of the anti-discrimination- and equality of opportunity-based positions.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  38.  16
    Doping, fairness, and unequal responsiveness: A response to Lavazza.Thomas Søbirk Petersen & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2021 - Bioethics 35 (7):714-717.
    Bioethics, Volume 35, Issue 7, Page 714-717, September 2021.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  39.  96
    Democratic Egalitarianism versus Luck Egalitarianism: What Is at Stake?Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2012 - Philosophical Topics 40 (1):117-134.
    This paper takes a fresh look at Elizabeth Anderson’s democratic egalitarianism and its relation to luck egalitarianism in the light of recent trends toward greater socioeconomic inequality. Anderson’s critique of luck egalitarianism and her alternative ideal of democratic equality are set out. It is then argued that the former is not very powerful, and that the latter is vulnerable to many of Anderson’s criticisms of luck egalitarianism. The paper also seeks to show that, on many of the issues over which (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  40.  23
    Cost-Effectiveness and the Avoidance of Discrimination in Healthcare: Can We Have Both?Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2023 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (2):202-215.
    Many ethical theorists believe that a given distribution of healthcare is morally justified only if (1) it is cost-effective and (2) it does not discriminate against older adults and disabled people. However, if (3) cost-effectiveness involves maximizing the number of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) added by a given unit of healthcare resource, or cost, it seems the pursuit of cost-effectiveness will inevitably discriminate against older adults and disabled patients. I show why this trilemma is harder to escape than some theorists think. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  41.  92
    Justice and bad luck.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  42.  10
    Global Injustice and Redistributive Wars.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - unknown
    On Pogge’s view, we —people living in rich countries— do not just allow the global poor to die. Rather, we interfere with them in such a way that we make them die on a massive scale. If we did the same through military aggression against them, surely, it would be permissible for these people to wage war on us to prevent this. Suppose Pogge’s analysis of the causes of global poverty is correct, and assume the moral permissibility of self-defence by (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  43.  93
    Vote Buying and Election Promises: Should Democrats Care About the Difference?Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2011 - Journal of Political Philosophy 19 (2):125-144.
  44. Intentions and Discrimination in Hiring.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (1):55-74.
    Fundamentally, intentions do not matter to the permissibility of actions, according to Thomas Scanlon (among others). Yet, discriminatory intentions seem essential to certain kinds of direct discrimination in hiring and firing, and appear to be something by virtue of which, in part at least, these kinds of discrimination are morally impermissible. Scanlon's account of the wrongness of discrimination attempts to accommodate this appearance through the notion of the expressive meaning of discriminatory acts and a certain view about how permissibility relates (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  45.  24
    Barry and Øverland on Singer and assistance-based duties.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2019 - Ethics and Global Politics 12 (1):15-23.
  46.  89
    Hurley on egalitarianism and the luck-neutralizing aim.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2005 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (2):249-265.
    s admirable new book, Justice, Luck, and Knowledge , brings together recent developments in the fields of responsibility and egalitarian justice. This article focuses on Hurley’s critique of luck-neutralizing egalitarianism. The article concludes that the bad-luck-neutralizing aim serves better as a justificatory basis for egalitarianism than the more general luck-neutralizing aim. Since the former does not simply assume that we should aim for equality, Hurley has not demonstrated (nor indeed does she claim to have shown) that this concern cannot form (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  47.  27
    Brain Privacy, Intimacy, and Authenticity: Why a Complete Lack of the Former Might Undermine Neither of the Latter!Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2017 - Res Publica 23 (2):227-244.
    In recent years, neuroscience has been making dramatic progress. The discipline holds great promise but also raises a number of important ethical concerns. Among these is the concern that, some day in the distant future, we will have brain scanners capable of reading our minds, thus making our inner thoughts transparent to others. There are at least two reasons why we might regret our resulting loss of privacy. One is, so the argument goes, that this would undermine our ability to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  48.  28
    Reaction Qualifications Revisited.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2009 - Social Theory and Practice 35 (3):413-439.
  49. Ethics, organ donation and tax: a proposal.Thomas Søbirk Petersen & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (8):451-457.
    Five arguments are presented in favour of the proposal that people who opt in as organ donors should receive a tax break. These arguments appeal to welfare, autonomy, fairness, distributive justice and self-ownership, respectively. Eight worries about the proposal are considered in this paper. These objections focus upon no-effect and counter-productiveness, the Titmuss concern about social meaning, exploitation of the poor, commodification, inequality and unequal status, the notion that there are better alternatives, unacceptable expense, and concerns about the veto of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  50. Why killing some people is more seriously wrong than killing others.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2007 - Ethics 117 (4):716-738.
1 — 50 / 145