1.  32
    A Multi-Dimensional Criticism of the Triple Bottom Line Reporting Approach.Kaushik Sridhar - 2011 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 6 (1):49-67.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  2.  49
    The Three Fundamental Criticisms of the Triple Bottom Line Approach: An Empirical Study to Link Sustainability Reports in Companies Based in the Asia-Pacific Region and TBL Shortcomings. [REVIEW]Kaushik Sridhar & Grant Jones - 2013 - Asian Journal of Business Ethics 2 (1):91 - 111.
    Abstract There is increasing evidence suggesting that environmental and social criteria are impacting the market in complex ways. The corporate world has demonstrated a willingness to respond to public pressure for improved performance on non–economic issues by embracing Triple Bottom Line (TBL) principles. TBL reporting has been institutionalized as a way of thinking for corporate sustainability. However, institutions are constantly changing and improving, while TBL has been fairly conservative in its approach to change. The more balanced focus on the economic, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3.  25
    Is the Triple Bottom Line a Restrictive Framework for Non-Financial Reporting?Kaushik Sridhar - 2012 - Asian Journal of Business Ethics 1 (2):89 - 121.
    Abstract The purpose of this paper is to empirically analyse the developmental stages of non-financial reporting in corporations, by interpreting the views of interviewees from major ethical corporations on the six major dimensions of non-financial reporting (identified in the literature) within each stage of the five-stage model of non-financial reporting (developed in this paper). This study is part of a series of papers on Triple Bottom Line reporting (TBL), and its relevance to corporate reporting practices. The TBL is perhaps the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
    Export citation