25 found
Order:
  1.  59
    U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perception: Implications for child language acquisition.Kim Plunkett & Virginia Marchman - 1991 - Cognition 38 (1):43-102.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   181 citations  
  2.  69
    From rote learning to system building: acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets.Kim Plunkett & Virginia Marchman - 1993 - Cognition 48 (1):21-69.
  3.  63
    Labels can override perceptual categories in early infancy.Kim Plunkett, Jon-Fan Hu & Leslie B. Cohen - 2008 - Cognition 106 (2):665-681.
  4.  46
    The shape of words in the brain.Vanja Kovic, Kim Plunkett & Gert Westermann - 2010 - Cognition 114 (1):19-28.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  5.  64
    A Connectionist Model of English Past Tense and Plural Morphology.Kim Plunkett & Patrick Juola - 1999 - Cognitive Science 23 (4):463-490.
    The acquisition of English noun and verb morphology is modeled using a single-system connectionist network. The network is trained to produce the plurals and past tense forms of a large corpus of monosyllabic English nouns and verbs. The developmental trajectory of network performance is analyzed in detail and is shown to mimic a number of important features of the acquisition of English noun and verb morphology in young children. These include an initial error-free period of performance on both nouns and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  6.  43
    A neurocomputational account of taxonomic responding and fast mapping in early word learning.Julien Mayor & Kim Plunkett - 2010 - Psychological Review 117 (1):1-31.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  7.  48
    The Role of Novelty in Early Word Learning.Emily Mather & Kim Plunkett - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (7):1157-1177.
    What mechanism implements the mutual exclusivity bias to map novel labels to objects without names? Prominent theoretical accounts of mutual exclusivity (e.g., Markman, 1989, 1990) propose that infants are guided by their knowledge of object names. However, the mutual exclusivity constraint could be implemented via monitoring of object novelty (see Merriman, Marazita, & Jarvis, 1995). We sought to discriminate between these contrasting explanations across two preferential looking experiments with 22-month-olds. In Experiment 1, infants viewed three objects: one name-known, two name-unknown. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  8.  42
    Phonological priming and cohort effects in toddlers.Nivedita Mani & Kim Plunkett - 2011 - Cognition 121 (2):196-206.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  9.  43
    What’s in a link: Associative and taxonomic priming effects in the infant lexicon.Natalia Arias-Trejo & Kim Plunkett - 2013 - Cognition 128 (2):214-227.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  10.  54
    Labels as Features (Not Names) for Infant Categorization: A Neurocomputational Approach.Valentina Gliozzi, Julien Mayor, Jon-Fan Hu & Kim Plunkett - 2009 - Cognitive Science 33 (4):709-738.
    A substantial body of experimental evidence has demonstrated that labels have an impact on infant categorization processes. Yet little is known regarding the nature of the mechanisms by which this effect is achieved. We distinguish between two competing accounts: supervised name‐based categorization and unsupervised feature‐based categorization. We describe a neurocomputational model of infant visual categorization, based on self‐organizing maps, that implements the unsupervised feature‐based approach. The model successfully reproduces experiments demonstrating the impact of labeling on infant visual categorization reported in (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  11.  38
    Timing matters: The impact of label synchrony on infant categorisation.Nadja Althaus & Kim Plunkett - 2015 - Cognition 139 (C):1-9.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  12.  13
    Bottom-up processes dominate early word recognition in toddlers.Janette Chow, Armando Q. Angulo-Chavira, Marlene Spangenberg, Leonie Hentrup & Kim Plunkett - 2022 - Cognition 228 (C):105214.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  13.  54
    Learning from a connectionist model of the acquisition of the English past tense.Kim Plunkett & Virginia A. Marchman - 1996 - Cognition 61 (3):299-308.
    Comments on G. Marcus' criticisms (see record 1996-24670-001) of K. Plunkett's and V. Marcham's (see record 1994-35650-001) connectionist account of the acquisition of the English past tense (verb morphology). The original model is reviewed. Graphing, overregularization, and other criticisms are addressed (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2000 APA, all rights reserved).
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  14.  24
    Innateness and Emergentism.Elizabeth Bates, Jeffrey L. Elman, Mark H. Johnson, Annette Karmiloff-Smith, Domenico Parisi & Kim Plunkett - 1998 - In George Graham & William Bechtel (eds.), A Companion to Cognitive Science. Blackwell. pp. 590–601.
    The nature–nurture controversy has been with us since it was first outlined by Plato and Aristotle. Nobody likes it anymore. All reasonable scholars today agree that genes and environment interact to determine complex cognitive outcomes. So why does the controversy persist? First, it persists because it has practical implications that cannot be postponed (i.e., what can we do to avoid bad outcomes and insure better ones?), a state of emergency that sometimes tempts scholars to stake out claims they cannot defend. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  15.  18
    Prime saliency in semantic priming with 18-month-olds.Nicola Gillen, Armando Quetzalcóatl Angulo-Chavira & Kim Plunkett - 2024 - Cognition 246 (C):105764.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16. Learning to associate object categories and label categories: A self-organising model.Julien Mayor & Kim Plunkett - 2008 - In B. C. Love, K. McRae & V. M. Sloutsky (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society. pp. 697--702.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  17.  19
    Making Nets Work Hard.Kim Plunkett - 1993 - Mind and Language 8 (4):549-558.
  18.  40
    (1 other version)Vocabulary of 2-year-olds learning English and an additional language: norms and effects of linguistic distance. II: Methods.Caroline Floccia, Thomas Sambrook, Claire Delle Luche, Rosa Kwok, Jeremy Goslin, Laurence White, Allegra Cattani, Emily Sullivan, Kirsten Abbot-Smith, Andrea Krott, Debbie Mills, Caroline Rowland, Judit Gervain & Kim Plunkett - unknown
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  9
    The role of colour labels in mediating toddler visual attention.Samuel H. Forbes & Kim Plunkett - 2019 - Cognition 186 (C):159-170.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. The impact of labels on visual categorisation: A neural network model.Valentina Gliozzi, Julien Mayor, Jon-Fan Hu & Kim Plunkett - 2008 - In B. C. Love, K. McRae & V. M. Sloutsky (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  52
    Constraints on the construction of cognition.Mark H. Johnson, Liz Bates, Jeff Elman, Annette Karmiloff-Smith & Kim Plunkett - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):569-570.
    We add to the constructivist approach of Quartz & Sejnowski (Q&S) by outlining a specific classification of sources of constraint on the emergence of representations from Elman et al. (1996). We suggest that it is important to consider behavioral constructivism in addition to neural constructivism.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  20
    What Does It Mean to Claim that Something Is 'Innate'? Response to Clark, Harris, Lightfoot and Samuels.Annette Karmiloff-Smith, Kim Plunkett, Mark H. Johnson, Jeff L. Elman & Elizabeth A. Bates - 1998 - Mind and Language 13 (4):588-597.
  23.  28
    Same items, different order: Effects of temporal variability on infant categorization.Emily Mather & Kim Plunkett - 2011 - Cognition 119 (3):438-447.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  24.  10
    Computational Models of Development: A Symposium.Kim Plunkett & Thomas R. Shultz - 1996 - In Garrison W. Cottrell (ed.), Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of The Cognitive Science Society. Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 18--61.
  25.  97
    Connectionism today.Kim Plunkett - 2001 - Synthese 129 (2):185-194.
    Connectionist networks have been used to model a wide range of cognitivephenomena, including developmental, neuropsychological and normal adultbehaviours. They have offered radical alternatives to traditional accounts ofwell-established facts about cognition. The primary source of the success ofthese models is their sensitivity to statistical regularities in their trainingenvironment. This paper provides a brief description of the connectionisttoolbox and how this has developed over the past 2 decades, with particularreference to the problem of reading aloud.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark