4 found
Order:
See also
Kirsten Persson
Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover
  1.  32
    Empirical Methods in Animal Ethics.Kirsten Persson & David Shaw - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (5):853-866.
    In this article the predominant, purely theoretical perspectives on animal ethics are questioned and two important sources for empirical data in the context of animal ethics are discussed: methods of the social and methods of the natural sciences. Including these methods can lead to an empirical animal ethics approach that is far more adapted to the needs of humans and nonhuman animals and more appropriate in different circumstances than a purely theoretical concept solely premised on rational arguments. However, the potential (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  10
    Sample and Data Sharing Barriers in Biobanking: Consent, Committees, and Compromises.Flora Colledge, Kirsten Persson, Bernice Elger & David Shaw - 2014 - Annals of Diagnostic Pathology 18 (2):78-81.
    The ability to exchange samples and data is crucial for the rapidly growth of biobanking. However, sharing is based on the assumption that the donor has given consent to a given use of her or his sample. Biobanking stakeholders, therefore, must choose 1 of 3 options: obtain general consent enabling multiple future uses before taking a sample from the donor, try to obtain consent again before sharing a previously obtained sample, or look for a legally endorsed way to share a (...)
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3.  8
    Das ist doch krank, oder? – Werkstattbericht eines interdisziplinären Lehrforschungsprojektes in der Psychiatrie.Joschka Haltaufderheide, Kirsten Persson, Ina Otte & Jochen Vollmann - 2019 - Ethik in der Medizin 31 (2):187-191.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. A Wicked Fairy in the Woods - How Would People Alter Their Animal Product Consumption If They Were Affected by the Consequences of Their Choices?David Shaw, Rahel Appel & Kirsten Persson - 2019 - Food Ethics 4 (1):1-20.
    The ambivalence of human-animal-relationships culminates in our eating habits; most people disapprove of factory farming, but most animal products that are consumed come from factory farming. While psychology and sociology offer several theoretical explanations for this phenomenon our study presents an experimental approach: an attempt to challenge people’s attitude by confronting them with the animals’ perspective of the consumption process. We confronted our participants with a fictional scenario that could result in them being turned into an animal. In the scenario, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark