In controversies about technology and society, there is no idea more pro vocative than the notion that technical things have political qualities. At issue is the claim that the machines, structures, and systems of modern material culture can be accurately judged not only for their contributions of efficiency and pro-ductivity, not merely for their positive and negative environmental side effects, but also for the ways in which they can embody specific forms of power and authority. Since ideas of this kind (...) have a persistent and troubling presence in discussions about the meaning of technology, they deserve explicit attention... (shrink)
Contemporary philosophical discussions about technology mirror a profound distance between technical practice and moral thought. I consider the origins of this gap as reflected in both ancient and modern writings. The philosopher's version of technocracy ? rushing forward with the analysis of moral categories in the hope that policy?makers or the public will find them decisive ? does nothing to bridge this gap and is, therefore, a forlorn strategy. The trouble is not that we lack good arguments and theories, but (...) rather that modern politics does not provide appropriate roles and institutions in which the activity of defining the common good in technology policy is a legitimate project. I find glimmerings of an alternative practice in the ?Scandinavian approach? to democratic participation in technological design. (shrink)
Recent attempts to rename the geological epoch in which we live, now called the “Holocene,” have produced a number of impressive suggestions. Among these the leading contender at present is the “Anthropocene.” Despite its possible advantages, there are a number of reasons why this term is ultimately misleading and unhelpful in both philosophical and policy deliberations. Especially off-putting is the word’s tendency to identify the human species as a whole as the culprit in controversial changes in Earth’s biosphere whose proximate (...) sources can be more accurately identified. The new candidate term echoes discussions of “Man and...” in countless twentieth-century publications, an outmoded conceit rightly overcome in more recent writings on science, technology and society. (shrink)
The romanticization of the personal computer as a social panacea threatens to blind society to the fact that without guiding wisdom even the best tool can be misused.
A lo largo de la historia del desarrollo tecnológico en los Estados Unidos, se ha constatado la creencia persistente en que existe una relación entre el avance de la tecnología y un tipo de ideal político, a saber, la convicción de que los nuevos artefactos técnicos revitalizarán la sociedad democrática al aumentar la participación ciudadana y la calidad de esta participación, dotando a los ciudadanos de nuevos y más extendidos recursos políticos y económicos que los capacitan para el autogobierno. En (...) la época actual, esta creencia histórica se aplica al ámbito de los ordenadores y las redes telemáticas, como Internet. Sin embargo, cabe preguntarse si el solo aumento de recursos técnicos entre la población tiene una contrapartida real en cuanto la participación democrática en asuntos políticos, o más bien se trata solamente de una extendida creencia idealista sin fundamento constatado. (shrink)
Although Ludwig Wittgenstein did not offer a fully developed philosophy of technology, his writings contain an approach to inquiry that can be employed to explore situations in which people contend with technological devices and systems. His notions of ‘language games’ and ‘forms of life’ as well as the dramatic, imaginary dialogues in his later writings offer ways to transcend the sometimes rigid theoretical frameworks in contemporary technology studies. Especially as applied to rapidly moving infusions of computing and digital electronics in (...) contemporary society, Wittgenstein’s writings offer possibilities for fresh insight and even some practical alternatives. (shrink)
