Results for 'Legal polycentricity'

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  13
    Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law Beyond Border.Paul Schiff Berman - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.
    A world of legal conflicts -- The limits of sovereigntist territoriality -- From universalism to cosmopolitanism -- Towards a cosmopolitan pluralist jurisprudence -- Procedural mechanisms, institutional designs, and discursive practices for managing pluralism -- The changing terrain of jurisdiction -- A cosmopolitan pluralist approach to choice of law -- Recognition of judgments and the legal negotiation of difference.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  38
    Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy.Yves Dezalay & Bryant G. Garth (eds.) - 2002 - University of Michigan Press.
    Global Prescriptions scrutinizes the movement to export a U.S.-oriented version of the " rule of law," found in the activities of philanthropic foundations, the World Bank, the U.S. Agency for International Development, and several other developmental organizations. Yves Dezalay and Bryant G. Garth have brought together a group of scholars from a variety of disciplines--anthropology, economics, history, law, political science, and sociology--to create tools for understanding this movement. Comprised of two sections, the volume first develops theoretical perspectives key to an (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3.  33
    Language, Culture and the Law: The Formulation of Legal Concepts Across Systems and Cultures.V. K. Bhatia, Christopher Candlin & Paola Evangelisti Allori (eds.) - 2008 - Peter Lang.
    The volume presents a set of invited papers based on analyses of legal discourse drawn from a number of international contexts where often the English language ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  9
    Legal Pluralism and Development: Scholars and Practitioners in Dialogue.Brian Z. Tamanaha, Caroline Mary Sage & Michael J. V. Woolcock (eds.) - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.
    Machine generated contents note: Part I. Origins and Contours: 1. Historical perspectives on legal pluralism Lauren Benton; 2. The rule of law and legal pluralism in development Brian Z. Tamanaha; 3. Bendable rules: the development implications of human rights pluralism David Kinley; 4. Legal pluralism and legal culture: mapping the terrain Sally Engle Merry; 5. Towards equity in development when the law is not the law: reflections on legal pluralism in practice Daniel Adler and So (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Ordering Pluralism: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding the Transnational Legal World.Mireille Delmas-Marty - 2009 - Hart.
  6. Legal Integration of Islam: A Transatlantic Comparison.Christian Joppke - 2013 - Harvard University Press.
    Neutrality, liberalism, and islam integration in Europe and America -- Limits of excluding: the French burqa law of 2010 -- Limits of including: Germany's reticence to "cooperate" with organized Islam -- "Reasonable accommodation" and the limits of multiculturalism in Canada -- The dog that didn't bark: Islam and religious pluralism in the United States -- Islam and identity in the liberal state.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7. Comparative Law and Hybrid Legal Traditions: Lausanne, 10-11 September 2009.Eleanor Cashin-Ritaine, Seán Patrick Donlan & Martin Sychold (eds.) - 2010 - Schulthess.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Polycentricity: The Multiple Scenes of Law.Ari Hirvonen (ed.) - 1998 - Pluto Press.
  9.  3
    Bijuralism: An Economic Approach.Albert Breton & M. J. Trebilcock (eds.) - 2006 - Ashgate Pub. Company.
    Bijural services as factors of production -- Commentary A on Breton and Salmon -- Commentary B on Breton and Salmon -- The challenge of incomplete law and how different legal systems respond -- Commentary C on Pistor and Xu -- Commentary D on Pistor and Xu -- Coevolution as an influence in the development of legal systems -- Commentary E on Breton and Des Ormeaux -- Commentary F on Breton and Des Ormeaux -- The demand for bijurally trained (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  5
    Multijuralism: Manifestations, Causes, and Consequences.Albert Breton (ed.) - 2009 - Ashgate.
    This volume represents some of the most current thinking in the area of multijuralism and is essential reading for anyone interested in the coexistence of legal ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  13
    Understanding Law and Society.Max Travers - 2010 - Routledge.
    Classical thinkers -- The consensus tradition -- Critical perspectives -- Feminism and law -- The interpretive tradition -- Postmodernism and difference -- Legal pluralism and globalisation.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Le Plurijuridisme: Actes du 8ème Congrés de l'Association Internationale de Méthodologie Juridique (Aix-En-Provence, 4-6 Septembre 2003). [REVIEW]Jean-Louis Bergel (ed.) - 2005 - Presses Universitaires d'Aix-Marseille.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Teoría Del Derecho y Antropología Jurídica: Un Diálogo Inconcluso.Oscar Correas - 2010 - Coyoacán.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  5
    Normative Pluralism and International Law: Exploring Global Governance.Jan Klabbers & Touko Piiparinen (eds.) - 2013 - Cambridge University Press.
    This book addresses conflicts involving how law relates normative orders. The assumption behind the book is that law no longer automatically claims supremacy, but that actors can pick and choose which code to follow.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  4
    A invasão do direito: a expansão jurídica sobre o Estado, o mercado e a moral.Júlio Aurélio Vianna Lopes - 2005 - FGV Editora.
    O gás sarin no metrô de Tóquio, as 'balas perdidas' no Rio de Janeiro e os ataques terroristas às torres gêmeas em Nova York ou ao transporte coletivo em Madri e Londres revelam que nossa sociedade interdependente é muito vulnerável.
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Pour Un Droit Pluriel.Jean-Fran÷Cois Perrin, Jean Kellerhals, Dominique Manaèi & Robert Roth - 2002
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. 20th-Century Bulgarian Philosophy of Law: From Critical Acceptance of Kant’s Ideas to the Logic of Legal Reasoning.Vihren Bouzov - 2016 - In Enrico Pattaro & C. Roversi (eds.), A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence. V.12 (1), Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Civil Law World. pp. 681-690.
    My analysis here is an attempt to bring out the main through-line in the development of Bulgarian philosophy of law today. A proper account of Bulgarian philosophy of law in the 20th century requires an attempt to find, on the one hand, a solution to epistemological and methodological problems in law and, on the other, a clear-cut influence of the Kantian critical tradition. Bulgarian philosophy of law follows a complicated path, ranging from acceptance and revision of Kantian philosophy to the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. The Anarchist Official: A Problem for Legal Positivism.Kenneth M. Ehrenberg - 2011 - Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 36:89-112.
    I examine the impact of the presence of anarchists among key legal officials upon the legal positivist theories of H.L.A. Hart and Joseph Raz. For purposes of this paper, an anarchist is one who believes that the law cannot successfully obligate or create reasons for action beyond prudential reasons, such as avoiding sanction. I show that both versions of positivism require key legal officials to endorse the law in some way, and that if a legal system (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  5
    Negotiating the Meaning of “Law”: The Metalinguistic Dimension of the Dispute Over Legal Positivism.David Plunkett - 2016 - Legal Theory 22 (3-4):205-275.
    One of the central debates in legal philosophy is the debate over legal positivism. Roughly, positivists say that law is ultimately grounded in social facts alone, whereas antipositivists say it is ultimately grounded in both social facts and moral facts. In this paper, I argue that philosophers involved in the dispute over legal positivism sometimes employ distinct concepts when they use the term “law” and pick out different things in the world using these concepts. Because of this, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. The Question of Evil and Feminist Legal Scholarship.Thérèse Murphy & Noel Whitty - 2006 - Feminist Legal Studies 14 (1):1-26.
    In this article, we argue that feminist legal scholars should engage directly and explicitly with the question of evil. Part I summarises key facts surrounding the prosecution and life-long imprisonment of Myra Hindley, one of a tiny number of women involved in multiple killings of children in recent British history. Part II reviews a range of commentaries on Hindley, noting in particular the repeated use of two narratives: the first of these insists that Hindley is an icon of female (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  34
    Reasons of Law: Dworkin on the Legal Decision.Anthony R. Reeves - 2016 - Jurisprudence: An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought 7 (2):210-230.
    Ronald Dworkin once identified the basic question of jurisprudence as: ‘What, in general, is a good reason for a decision by a court of law?’ I argue that, over the course of his career, Dworkin gave an essentially sound answer to this question. In fact, he gave a correct answer to a broader question: ‘What is a good reason for a legal decision, generally?’ For judges, officials of executive and administrative agencies, lawyers, non-governmental organizations, and ordinary subjects acting in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  14
    The Ethic of Care, Female Subjectivity and Feminist Legal Scholarship.Maria Drakopoulou - 2000 - Feminist Legal Studies 8 (2):199-226.
    The object of this essay is to explore the central role played by the ‘ethic of care’ in debates within and beyond feminist legal theory. The author claims that the ethic of care has attracted feminist legal scholars in particular, as a means of resolving the theoretical, political and strategic difficulties to which the perceived ‘crisis of subjectivity’ in feminist theory has given rise. She argues that feminist legal scholars are peculiarly placed in relation to this crisis (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  23.  59
    Lawyers, Context, and Legitimacy: A New Theory of Legal Ethics.Alexander A. Guerrero - 2012 - Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 25 (1):107-164.
    Even good lawyers get a bad rap. One explanation for this is that the professional rules governing lawyers permit and even require behavior that strikes many as immoral. The standard accounts of legal ethics that seek to defend these professional rules do little to dispel this air of immorality. The revisionary accounts of legal ethics that criticize the professional rules inject a hearty dose of morality, but at the cost of leaving lawyers unrecognizable as lawyers. This article suggests (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Vagueness and Law. Philosophical and Legal Perspectives.Keil Geert & Ralf Poscher - 2016 - In Geert Keil & Ralf Poscher (eds.), Vagueness and Law. Philosophical and Legal Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford university Press. pp. 1-20.
    Vague expressions are omnipresent in natural language. As such, their use in legal texts is virtually inevitable. If a law contains vague terms, the question whether it applies to a particular case often lacks a clear answer. One of the fundamental pillars of the rule of law is legal certainty. The determinacy of the law enables people to use it as a guide and places judges in the position to decide impartially. Vagueness poses a threat to these ideals. (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  35
    Francisco de Vitoria and Alberico Gentili on the Legal Character of the Global Commonwealth.Andreas Wagner - 2011 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 31 (3):565-582.
    In discussing the works of 16th-century theorists Francisco de Vitoria and Alberico Gentili, this article examines how two different conceptions of a global legal community affect the legal character of the international order and the obligatory force of international law. For Vitoria the legal bindingness of ius gentium necessarily presupposes an integrated character of the global commonwealth that leads him to as it were ascribe legal personality to the global community as a whole. But then its (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  3
    Barriers to Gender Equality in the Canadian Legal Establishment.Fiona M. Kay & Joan Brockman - 2000 - Feminist Legal Studies 8 (2):169-198.
    In this paper we trace the historical exclusion of women from the legal profession in Canada. We examine women’s efforts to gain entry to law practice and their progress through the last century. The battle to gain entry to this exclusive profession took place on many fronts: in the courts, government legislature, public debate and media, and behind the closed doors of the law societies. After formal barriers to entry were dismantled, women continued to confront formidable barriers through overt (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Legal Fictions, Assumptions and Comparisons.Giuliano Bacigalupo - 2015 - In Sandrine Chassagnard-Pinet, Patrice Canivez & Matthias Armgardt (eds.), Past and Present Interactions in Legal Reasoning and Logic. Springer Verlag.
    Pierre Olivier distinguishes between two radically different concep-tions of legal fictions: on the one hand, the conception of legal fiction developed by the commentators of the Middle Ages, which culminates in Bartolus’s defini-tion; on the other hand, the conception developed by the 19th Century German scholar Gustav Demelius, who was followed, among others, by Joseph Esser. The main difference between the two approaches is individuated by Olivier in the fact that, while the former consider legal fictions as (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Legal Subversion of the Criminal Justice Process? Judicial, Prosecutorial and Police Discretion in Edmondson, Kindrat and Brown.Lucinda Vandervort - 2012 - In Elizabeth Sheehy (ed.), SEXUAL ASSAULT IN CANADA: LAW, LEGAL PRACTICE & WOMEN'S ACTIVISM,. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press. pp. 111-150.
    In 2001, three non-Aboriginal men in their twenties were charged with the sexual assault of a twelve year old Aboriginal girl in rural Saskatchewan. Legal proceedings lasted almost seven years and included two preliminary hearings, two jury trials, two retrials with juries, and appeals to the provincial appeal court and the Supreme Court of Canada. One accused was convicted. The case raises questions about the administration of justice in sexual assault cases in Saskatchewan. Based on observation and analysis of (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Legal Vs. Ethical Obligations – a Comment on the EPSRC’s Principles for Robotics.Vincent C. Müller - 2017 - Connection Science 29 (2):137-141.
    While the 2010 EPSRC principles for robotics state a set of 5 rules of what ‘should’ be done, I argue they should differentiate between legal obligations and ethical demands. Only if we make this difference can we state clearly what the legal obligations already are, and what additional ethical demands we want to make. I provide suggestions how to revise the rules in this light and how to make them more structured.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. What is Legal Moralism?Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2011 - SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 12 (1):80-88.
    The aim of this critical commentary is to distinguish and analytically discuss some important variations in which legal moralism is defined in the literature. As such, the aim is not to evaluate the most plausible version of legal moralism, but to find the most plausible definition of legal moralism. As a theory of criminalization, i.e. a theory that aims to justify the criminal law we should retain, legal moralism can be, and has been, defined as follows: (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Institutions of Law: An Essay in Legal Theory.Neil MacCormick - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
    On normative order -- On institutional order-- Law and the constitutional state -- A problem : rules or habits? -- On persons -- Wrongs and duties -- Legal positions and relations : rights and obligations -- Legal relations and things : property -- Legal powers and validity -- Powers and public law : law and politics -- Constraints on power : fundamental rights -- Criminal law and civil society : law and morality -- Private law and civil (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  32. Extractive Summarisation of Legal Texts.Ben Hachey & Claire Grover - 2006 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 14 (4):305-345.
    We describe research carried out as part of a text summarisation project for the legal domain for which we use a new XML corpus of judgments of the UK House of Lords. These judgments represent a particularly important part of public discourse due to the role that precedents play in English law. We present experimental results using a range of features and machine learning techniques for the task of predicting the rhetorical status of sentences and for the task of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  33.  66
    Towards a Modest Legal Moralism.R. A. Duff - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):217-235.
    After distinguishing different species of Legal Moralism I outline and defend a modest, positive Legal Moralism, according to which we have good reason to criminalize some type of conduct if it constitutes a public wrong. Some of the central elements of the argument will be: the need to remember that the criminal law is a political, not a moral practice, and therefore that in asking what kinds of conduct we have good reason to criminalize, we must begin not (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  34.  90
    In Defense of Legal Positivism: Law Without Trimmings.Matthew H. Kramer - 1999 - Oxford University Press.
    This book is an uncompromising defense of legal positivism that insists on the separability of law and morality. After distinguishing among three facets of morality, Kramer explores a variety of ways in which law has been perceived as integrally connected to each of those facets. The book concludes with a detailed discussion of the obligation to obey the law--a discussion that highlights the strengths of legal positivism in the domain of political philosophy as much as in the domain (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  35.  74
    Inclusive Legal Positivism.Wilfrid J. Waluchow - 1994 - Oxford University Press.
    This book develops a general philosophical theory about the nature of law and its relationship with morality called inclusive legal positivism. In addition to articulating and defending his own version of legal positivism, which is a refinement and development of the views of H.L.A. Hart as expressed in his classic book The Concept of Law, the author clarifies the terms of current jurisprudential debates about the nature of law. These debates are often clouded by failures to appreciate that (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  36. Kant's Legal Metaphor and the Nature of a Deduction.Ian Proops - 2003 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2):209-229.
    This essay partly builds on and partly criticizes a striking idea of Dieter Henrich. Henrich argues that Kant's distinction in the first Critique between the question of fact (quid facti) and the question of law (quid juris) provides clues to the argumentative structure of a philosophical "Deduction". Henrich suggests that the unity of apperception plays a role analogous to a legal factum. By contrast, I argue, first, that the question of fact in the first Critique is settled by the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  37.  35
    A General Structure for Legal Arguments About Evidence Using Bayesian Networks.Norman Fenton, Martin Neil & David A. Lagnado - 2013 - Cognitive Science 37 (1):61-102.
    A Bayesian network (BN) is a graphical model of uncertainty that is especially well suited to legal arguments. It enables us to visualize and model dependencies between different hypotheses and pieces of evidence and to calculate the revised probability beliefs about all uncertain factors when any piece of new evidence is presented. Although BNs have been widely discussed and recently used in the context of legal arguments, there is no systematic, repeatable method for modeling legal arguments as (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  38. Law’s Artifactual Nature: How Legal Institutions Generate Normativity.Kenneth M. Ehrenberg - 2015 - In George Pavlakos & Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco (eds.), Reasons and Intentions in Law and Practical Agency. Cambridge University Press. pp. 247-266.
    I argue that law is best understood as an institutionalized abstract artifact. Using the ideas of John Searle on institutions and Amie Thomasson on artifacts, I show how the law is capable of generating new reasons for action, arguing against recent work by David Enoch who holds that legal reason-giving is ultimately a form of triggering conditional reasons.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  26
    We ’Re All Infected: Legal Personhood, Bare Life and The Walking Dead‘.Mitchell Travis - 2015 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 28 (4):787-800.
    This article argues that greater theoretical attention should be paid to the figure of the zombie in the fields of law, cultural studies and philosophy. Using The Walking Dead as a point of critical departure concepts of legal personhood are interrogated in relation to permanent vegetative states, bare life and the notion of the third person. Ultimately, the paper recommends a rejection of personhood; instead favouring a legal and philosophical engagement with humanity and embodiment. Personhood, it is suggested, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  40.  52
    The Legal Self: Executive Processes and Legal Theory.William Hirstein & Katrina Sifferd - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (1):151-176.
    When laws or legal principles mention mental states such as intentions to form a contract, knowledge of risk, or purposely causing a death, what parts of the brain are they speaking about? We argue here that these principles are tacitly directed at our prefrontal executive processes. Our current best theories of consciousness portray it as a workspace in which executive processes operate, but what is important to the law is what is done with the workspace content rather than the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  41.  37
    A Guide to Critical Legal Studies.Mark Kelman - 1987 - Harvard University Press.
    This book outlines and evaluates the principal strands of critical legal studies, and achieves much more as well.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  42.  60
    New Legal Moralism: Some Strengths and Challenges.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (2):215-232.
    The aim of this paper is to critically discuss the plausibility of legal moralism with an emphasis on some central and recent versions. First, this paper puts forward and defends the thesis that recently developed varieties of legal moralism promoted by Robert P. George, John Kekes and Michael Moore are more plausible than Lord Devlin's traditional account. The main argument for this thesis is that in its more modern versions legal moralism is immune to some of the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  43.  78
    Legal Moralism and Retribution Revisited.Jeffrie G. Murphy - 2006 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (1):5-20.
    This is a slightly revised text of Jeffrie G. Murphy’s Presidential Address delivered to the American Philosophical Association, Pacific Division, in March 2006. In the essay the author reconsiders two positions he had previously defended—the liberal attack on legal moralism and robust versions of the retributive theory of punishment—and now finds these positions much more vulnerable to legitimate attack than he had previously realized. In the first part of the essay, he argues that the use of Mill’s liberal harm (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  44.  15
    Formalising Ordinary Legal Disputes: A Case Study. [REVIEW]Henry Prakken - 2008 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (4):333-359.
    This paper presents a formal reconstruction of a Dutch civil legal case in Prakken’s formal model of adjudication dialogues. The object of formalisation is the argumentative speech acts exchanged during the dispute by the adversaries and the judge. The goal of this formalisation is twofold: to test whether AI & law models of legal dialogues in general, and Prakken’s model in particular, are suitable for modelling particular legal procedures; and to learn about the process of formalising an (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  45.  37
    An Empirical Investigation of Reasoning with Legal Cases Through Theory Construction and Application.Alison Chorley & Trevor Bench-Capon - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (3-4):323-371.
    In recent years several proposals to view reasoning with legal cases as theory construction have been advanced. The most detailed of these is that of Bench-Capon and Sartor, which uses facts, rules, values and preferences to build a theory designed to explain the decisions in a set of cases. In this paper we describe CATE (CAse Theory Editor), a tool intended to support the construction of theories as described by Bench-Capon and Sartor, and which produces executable code corresponding to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  46. The Argument From Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism.Alexy Robert - 2002 - Oxford University Press UK.
    At the heart of this book is the age-old question of how law and morality are related. The legal positivist, insisting on the separation of the two, explicates the concept of law independently of morality. The author challenges this view, arguing that there are, first, conceptually necessary connections between law and morality and, second, normative reasons for including moral elements in the concept of law. While the conceptual argument alone is too limited to establish a sufficiently strong connection between (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  47.  27
    Legal Concepts as Inferential Nodes and Ontological Categories.Giovanni Sartor - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (3):217-251.
    I shall compare two views of legal concepts: as nodes in inferential nets and as categories in an ontology (a conceptual architecture). Firstly, I shall introduce the inferential approach, consider its implications, and distinguish the mere possession of an inferentially defined concept from the belief in the concept’s applicability, which also involves the acceptance of the concept’s constitutive inferences. For making this distinction, the inferential and eliminative analysis of legal concepts proposed by Alf Ross will be connected to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  48.  86
    Prescriptive Legal Positivism: Law, Rights and Democracy.Tom Campbell - 2004 - Cavendish Publishing.
    Tom Campbell is well known for his distinctive contributions to legal and political philosophy over three decades. In emphasising the moral and political importance of taking a positivist approach to law and rights, he has challenged current academic orthodoxies and made a powerful case for regaining and retaining democratic control over the content and development of human rights. This collection of his essays reaches back to his pioneering work on socialist rights in the 1980s and forward from his seminal (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  49.  54
    A Theory of Legal Reasoning and a Logic to Match.Jaap Hage - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):199-273.
    This paper describes a model of legal reasoning and a logic for reasoning with rules, principles and goals that is especially suited to this model of legal reasoning. The paper consists of three parts. The first part describes a model of legal reasoning based on a two-layered view of the law. The first layer consists of principles and goals that express fundamental ideas of a legal system. The second layer contains legal rules which in a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  50.  50
    Legal Case-Based Reasoning as Practical Reasoning.Katie Atkinson & Trevor Bench-Capon - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (1):93-131.
    In this paper we apply a general account of practical reasoning to arguing about legal cases. In particular, we provide a reconstruction of the reasoning of the majority and dissenting opinions for a particular well-known case from property law. This is done through the use of Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) agents to replicate the contrasting views involved in the actual decision. This reconstruction suggests that the reasoning involved can be separated into three distinct levels: factual and normative levels and a level (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000