Order:
  1.  52
    The Role of Value Priorities and Professional Ethics Training in Moral Sensitivity.Liisa Myyry & Klaus Helkama - 2002 - Journal of Moral Education 31 (1):35-50.
    This study investigated the sensitivity to moral issues from a story in a professional context and development of the ability to interpret moral situations in a sample of 50 social psychology students participating in a one-semester course on professional ethics. The relationships between initial value priorities measured by Schwartz Value Survey (1992) and moral sensitivity were also explored. Nearly half of the respondents (46%) progressed on sensitivity from the pre-test to the post-test, whereas the control group's ( n = 6) (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  2.  27
    Does Care Reasoning Make a Difference? Relations Between Care, Justice and Dispositional Empathy.Soile Juujärvi, Liisa Myyry & Kaija Pesso - 2010 - Journal of Moral Education 39 (4):469-489.
    The aim of this study was to investigate relationships between care and justice reasoning, dispositional empathy variables and meta?ethical thinking among 128 students from a university of applied sciences. The measures were Skoe?s Ethic of Care Interview, the Defining Issues Test, Davis?s Interpersonal Reactivity Index and Meta?Ethical Questionnaire. The results showed that levels of care reasoning were positively related to the post?conventional schema and negatively related to the personal interest schema in justice reasoning. Age, meta?ethical thinking, the post?conventional schema and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3. Explorations in Reported Moral Behaviors, Values, and Moral Emotions in Four Countries.Liisa Myyry, Klaus Helkama, Mia Silfver-Kuhalampi, Kristina Petkova, Joaquim Pires Valentim & Kadi Liik - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 12.
    University students from Bulgaria, Estonia, Finland, and Portugal were given a list of morally relevant behaviors, the Schwartz Value Survey and Tangney’s TOSCA, measuring empathic guilt, guilt over norm-breaking, and shame. A factor analysis of MRB yielded 4 dimensions: prosocial behaviors, interpersonal transgressions, antisocial behaviors and secret transgressions. Prosocial behaviors were predicted by self-transcendence–self-enhancement value contrast only while the three transgression categories were associated with both SET and openness to change–conservation contrast. Norm-breaking guilt was more strongly associated with behaviors than (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark