37 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Lisa M. Rasmussen [36]Lisa Marie Rasmussen [1]
  1.  48
    Clinical Ethics Consultants are not “Ethics” Experts—But They do Have Expertise.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2016 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (4):384-400.
    The attempt to critique the profession of clinical ethics consultation by establishing the impossibility of ethics expertise has been a red herring. Decisions made in clinical ethics cases are almost never based purely on moral judgments. Instead, they are all-things-considered judgments that involve determining how to balance other values as well. A standard of justified decision-making in this context would enable us to identify experts who could achieve these standards more often than others, and thus provide a basis for expertise (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  2. Patient Advocacy in Clinical Ethics Consultation.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):1 - 9.
    The question of whether clinical ethics consultants may engage in patient advocacy in the course of consultation has not been addressed, but it highlights for the field that consultants? allegiances, and the boundaries of appropriate professional practice, must be better understood. I consider arguments for and against patient advocacy in clinical ethics consultation, which demonstrate that patient advocacy is permissible, but not central to the practice of consultation. I then offer four recommendations for consultants who engage in patient advocacy, and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  3.  51
    An Ethics Expertise for Clinical Ethics Consultation.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):649-661.
    The legitimacy of clinical ethics consultation is often implied to rest on the legitimacy of moral expertise. In turn, moral expertise seems subject to many serious critiques, the success of which implies that clinical ethics consultation is illegitimate. I explore a number of these critiques, and forward “ethics expertise,” as distinct from “moral expertise,” as a way of avoiding these critiques. I argue that “ethics expertise” succeeds in avoiding most of the critiques, captures what clinical ethics consultants might justifiably do, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  4.  25
    An Ethics Expertise for Clinical Ethics Consultation.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):649-661.
    A major obstacle to broad support of clinical ethics consultation is suspicion regarding the nature of the moral expertise it claims to offer. The suspicion seems to be confirmed when the field fails to make its moral expertise explicit. In this vacuum, critics suggest the following:Clinical ethics consultation's legitimacy depends on its ability to offer an expertise in moral matters.Expertise in moral matters is knowledge of a singular moral truth which applies to everyone.The claim that a clinical ethics consultant can (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  5.  32
    The “Ethics” Expertise in Clinical Ethics Consultation.Ana S. Iltis & Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2016 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (4):363-368.
    The nature, possibility, and implications of ethics expertise in general and of bioethics expertise in particular has been the focus of extensive debate for over thirty years. What is ethics expertise and what does it enable experts to do? Knowing what ethics expertise is can help answer another important question: What, if anything, makes a claim of expertise legitimate? In other words, how does someone earn the appellation “ethics expert?” There remains deep disagreement on whether ethics expertise is possible, and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  6.  15
    Against Inflationary Views of Ethics Expertise.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2018 - HEC Forum 30 (2):171-185.
    Abram Brummett and Christopher Ostertag offer critiques of my argument that clinical ethics consultants have expertise but are not “ethics experts”. My argument begins within our less-than-ideal world and asks what a justification of a clinical ethics consultation recommendation might look like under those conditions. It is a challenge to what could be called an “inflationary” position on ethics expertise that requires agreement on or rational proof of metaethical facts about the values at stake in clinical ethics consultation. Brummett and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  7.  16
    Beyond Belmont—and Beyond Regulations.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (8):19-21.
    The ethical (and philosophical) issues arising in citizen science are fascinating, challenging, and potentially pathbreaking in that they force us to reconsider the conceptual and regulatory catego...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  8.  19
    When Citizens Do Science: Stories from Labs, Garages, and Beyond.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2019 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 9 (1):1-4.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  9.  29
    Advocacy Through a Prism: A Response to Commentaries on “Patient Advocacy in Clinical Ethics Consultation”.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):W1 - W3.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 8, Page W1-W3, August 2012.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  10.  27
    Confucianism's Challenge to Western Bioethics.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):73-74.
    What about Confucian bioethics should compel our interest? Apart from the fact that Confucianism grounds the belief system of a great number of people, a Confucian bioethics poses a profound challe...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  11.  46
    Engineering, gerrymandering and expertise in public bioethics.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2006 - HEC Forum 18 (2):125-130.
  12.  24
    Partnering, Not Enduring: Citizen Science and Research Participation.Lisa M. Rasmussen & Toby Schonfeld - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):44-45.
    Volume 19, Issue 9, September 2019, Page 44-45.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  13.  22
    The Hard Question of Justification in Health Care Ethics Consultation.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (11):65-66.
    Volume 19, Issue 11, November 2019, Page 65-66.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  14.  42
    The Case of Vipul Bhrigu and the Federal Definition of Research Misconduct.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (2):411-421.
    The Office of Research Integrity found in 2011 that Vipul Bhrigu, a postdoctoral researcher who sabotaged a colleague’s research materials, was guilty of misconduct. However, I argue that this judgment is ill-considered and sets a problematic precedent for future cases. I first discuss the current federal definition of research misconduct and representative cases of research misconduct. Then, because this case recalls a debate from the 1990s over what the definition of “research misconduct” ought to be, I briefly recapitulate that history (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  15.  33
    Not all research is equal: Taking social science research into account.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (11):17 – 18.
  16.  35
    The ethics and aesthetics of for-profit bioethics consultation.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2005 - HEC Forum 17 (2):94-121.
  17.  19
    Clinical Ethics Consultation’s Dilemma, and a Solution.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2011 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 22 (4):380-392.
    Clinical ethics consultation is on the horns of a dilemma. One horn skewers the field for its lack of standards, while the other horn skewers it for proposing arbitrary or deeply contested foundations. I articulate the dilemma by discussing several critiques of the field and the challenge of formulating standards and suggest that the solution lies, at least until a robust consensus emerges, with establishing a list of proscriptive standards to guide the field.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  18. Families and Individuals in Medical Decision Making.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2015 - In Ruiping Fan (ed.), Family-Oriented Informed Consent: East Asian and American Perspectives. Cham: Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  19.  12
    Trust Architectures in Research.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2023 - Res Philosophica 100 (4):497-514.
    The research enterprise depends on trust, especially trust in data reliability and ethical conduct of research. This trust is accomplished via systems, or “architectures,” that do the work of ensuring trustworthiness in research when individuals are not able to assess it for themselves. In the United States and many other countries, national laws or regulations constitute the research ethics trust architecture. But new research methods, such as citizen science, DIY biology, biohacking, or corporate research, avoid such regulations because they draw (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. Clinical Bioethics: Analysis of a Practice.Lisa Marie Rasmussen - 2003 - Dissertation, Rice University
    This project is a philosophical analysis of the practice of bioethics consultation---what might be called the philosophy of bioethics. It assesses claims made about the purposes and appropriate aims of the field, in order to establish whether an identifiable conceptual unity underlies the practice. The conclusion is that no such unity exists. ;The project begins by assessing the history of the field, in the hope that a historical analysis will explain why the field arose at all, which reason could then (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  21.  14
    Organ Donation Incentives: A Multicultural Comparison.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2023 - In Ruiping Fan (ed.), Incentives and Disincentives in Organ Donation: A Multicultural Study among Beijing, Chicago, Tehran and Hong Kong. Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 263-273.
    This essay is a comparative analysis of results reported in this volume from studies in mainland China, the United States, Iran, and Hong Kong regarding organ donation incentives. They reveal widespread (but not unanimous) support for honorary incentives (such as notes or ceremonies of gratitude) and significant support for familist incentives (offering a donor’s family members priority should they need an organ transplant in the future). Opinions on financial incentives were much more mixed, with significant worries expressed regarding potential exploitation (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  16
    On Internal Accountability in Clinical Ethics Consultation.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (6):43-45.
    Before we commit significant resources of time and energy to clinical ethics consultation (CEC) certification, education, and the like, one of the questions we ought to be able to answer is how to...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  23.  7
    At the Foundations of Bioethics and Biopolitics: Critical Essays on the Thought of H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr.Mark J. Cherry, Ana Iltis & Lisa M. Rasmussen (eds.) - 2015 - Cham: Imprint: Springer.
    This volume brings together a set of critical essays on the thought of Professor Doctor H. Tristram Engelhardt Jr., Co-Founding Editor of the Philosophy and Medicine book series. Amongst the founders of bioethics, Professor Engelhardt, looms large. Many of his books and articles have appeared in multiple languages, including Italian, Romanian, Portuguese, Spanish, and Chinese. The essays in this book focus critically on a wide swath of his work, in the process elucidating, critiquing, and/or commending the rigor and reach of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  2
    Designing Engaging Content on Academic Authorship for Graduate Students.Holly D. Holladay-Sandidge, Lisa M. Rasmussen, Elise Demeter, Andrew McBride, George C. Banks & Katherine Hall-Hertel - 2023 - Teaching Ethics 23 (2):241-270.
    In this paper, we discuss our approach to developing engaging course content linked to distinct learning outcomes on the topic of academic authorship. Academic authorship is a critical element of research culture and responsible conduct of research (RCR) courses. Drawing on instructional design methods, our online course aims to stimulate critical thinking about ethical authorship practices and to help students develop skills for resolving authorship-related conflicts. The course is scaffolded to facilitate engagement by tying video and podcast-style media, a choice-based (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  23
    Bioethics and moral content: national traditions of health care morality: papers dedicated in tribute to Kazumasa Hoshino.Kazumasa Hoshino, H. Tristram Engelhardt & Lisa M. Rasmussen (eds.) - 2002 - Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Is there only one bioethics? Is a global bioethics possible? Or, instead, does one encounter a plurality of bioethical approaches shaped by local cultural and national traditions? Some thirty years ago a field of applied ethics emerged under the rubric `bioethics'. Little thought was given at the time to the possibility that this field bore the imprint of a particular American set of moral commitments. This volume explores the plurality of moral perspectives shaping bioethics. It is inspired by Kazumasa Hoshino's (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  68
    Patient ethics and responsibilities.Ana Smith Iltis & Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (2):131 – 137.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  27.  31
    Authorship Policies at U.S. Doctoral Universities: A Review and Recommendations for Future Policies.Lisa M. Rasmussen, Courtney E. Williams, Mary M. Hausfeld, George C. Banks & Bailey C. Davis - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (6):3393-3413.
    Intellectual contribution in the form of authorship is a fundamental component of the academic career. While research has addressed questionable and harmful authorship practices, there has largely been no discussion of how U.S. academic institutions interpret and potentially mitigate such practices through the use of institution-level authorship policies. To gain a better understanding of the role of U.S. academic institutions in authorship practices, we conducted a systematic review of publicly available authorship policies for U.S. doctoral institutions, focusing on components such (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  14
    Editorial: International perspectives on the baby trade.Lisa M. Rasmussen & Rosemarie Tong - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (8):ii-iv.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  15
    H. Tristram Engelhardt, jr.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2002 - In Kazumasa Hoshino, H. Tristram Engelhardt & Lisa M. Rasmussen (eds.), Bioethics and moral content: national traditions of health care morality: papers dedicated in tribute to Kazumasa Hoshino. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 3--1.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  68
    Introduction.Lisa M. Rasmussen & Ana Smith Iltis - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (6):617 – 619.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  31.  76
    Introduction.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2003 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (4):399 – 401.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  32.  35
    Morality, religion and metaphysics: Diverse visions in bioethics.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (4):367 – 377.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  33.  26
    Problems with Minimal-Risk Research Oversight: A Threat to Academic Freedom?Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2009 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 31 (3):11.
    A subcommittee of the American Association of University Professors has published a report, “Research on Human Subjects: Academic Freedom and the Institutional Review Board” , which argues that institutional review board oversight may pose a threat to academic freedom, and that a different oversight model based on departmental review would both maintain subject protection and eliminate the threat. But the report does not demonstrate that IRBs pose a threat to academic freedom, and using departmental oversight may not sufficiently protect human (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  34.  29
    Realizing Present and Future Promise of DIY Biology and Medicine through a Trust Architecture.Lisa M. Rasmussen, Christi J. Guerrini, Todd Kuiken, Camille Nebeker, Alex Pearlman, Sarah B. Ware, Anna Wexler & Patricia J. Zettler - 2020 - Hastings Center Report 50 (6):10-14.
    The speed and scale of the COVID‐19 pandemic has highlighted the limits of current health systems and the potential promise of non‐establishment research such as “DIY” research. We consider one example of how DIY research is responding to the pandemic, discuss the challenges faced by DIY research more generally, and suggest that a “trust architecture” should be developed now to contribute to successful future DIY efforts.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  32
    Sinister innovations: Beware the co-optation of clinical ethics consultation. [REVIEW]Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2006 - Journal of Value Inquiry 40 (2-3):235-242.
  36.  18
    Book Reviews Veatch, Robert M. Patient, Heal Thyself: How the New Medicine Puts the Patient in Charge . New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. Pp. 304. $29.95 (cloth). [REVIEW]Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2009 - Ethics 119 (4):801-805.
  37.  40
    Christopher Meyers, a practical guide to clinical ethics consulting: Expertise, ethos, and power. [REVIEW]Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2010 - Journal of Value Inquiry 44 (1):99-102.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark