32 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Lisa M. Rasmussen [31]Lisa Marie Rasmussen [1]
See also
Lisa Marie Rasmussen
University of North Carolina, Charlotte
  1.  26
    Clinical Ethics Consultants Are Not “Ethics” Experts—But They Do Have Expertise.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2016 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (4):384-400.
    The attempt to critique the profession of clinical ethics consultation by establishing the impossibility of ethics expertise has been a red herring. Decisions made in clinical ethics cases are almost never based purely on moral judgments. Instead, they are all-things-considered judgments that involve determining how to balance other values as well. A standard of justified decision-making in this context would enable us to identify experts who could achieve these standards more often than others, and thus provide a basis for expertise (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  2.  96
    Patient Advocacy in Clinical Ethics Consultation.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):1 - 9.
    The question of whether clinical ethics consultants may engage in patient advocacy in the course of consultation has not been addressed, but it highlights for the field that consultants? allegiances, and the boundaries of appropriate professional practice, must be better understood. I consider arguments for and against patient advocacy in clinical ethics consultation, which demonstrate that patient advocacy is permissible, but not central to the practice of consultation. I then offer four recommendations for consultants who engage in patient advocacy, and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  3.  33
    An Ethics Expertise for Clinical Ethics Consultation.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):649-661.
    The legitimacy of clinical ethics consultation is often implied to rest on the legitimacy of moral expertise. In turn, moral expertise seems subject to many serious critiques, the success of which implies that clinical ethics consultation is illegitimate. I explore a number of these critiques, and forward “ethics expertise,” as distinct from “moral expertise,” as a way of avoiding these critiques. I argue that “ethics expertise” succeeds in avoiding most of the critiques, captures what clinical ethics consultants might justifiably do, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  4.  15
    An Ethics Expertise for Clinical Ethics Consultation.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):649-661.
    A major obstacle to broad support of clinical ethics consultation is suspicion regarding the nature of the moral expertise it claims to offer. The suspicion seems to be confirmed when the field fails to make its moral expertise explicit. In this vacuum, critics suggest the following:Clinical ethics consultation's legitimacy depends on its ability to offer an expertise in moral matters.Expertise in moral matters is knowledge of a singular moral truth which applies to everyone.The claim that a clinical ethics consultant can (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  5.  18
    The “Ethics” Expertise in Clinical Ethics Consultation.Ana S. Iltis & Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2016 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (4):363-368.
    The nature, possibility, and implications of ethics expertise in general and of bioethics expertise in particular has been the focus of extensive debate for over thirty years. What is ethics expertise and what does it enable experts to do? Knowing what ethics expertise is can help answer another important question: What, if anything, makes a claim of expertise legitimate? In other words, how does someone earn the appellation “ethics expert?” There remains deep disagreement on whether ethics expertise is possible, and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  6.  12
    Advocacy Through a Prism: A Response to Commentaries on “Patient Advocacy in Clinical Ethics Consultation”.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):W1 - W3.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 8, Page W1-W3, August 2012.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  7.  8
    When Citizens Do Science: Stories From Labs, Garages, and Beyond.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2019 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 9 (1):1-4.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  8.  6
    The Hard Question of Justification in Health Care Ethics Consultation.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (11):65-66.
    Volume 19, Issue 11, November 2019, Page 65-66.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9.  6
    Partnering, Not Enduring: Citizen Science and Research Participation.Lisa M. Rasmussen & Toby Schonfeld - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):44-45.
    Volume 19, Issue 9, September 2019, Page 44-45.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  10.  22
    The Case of Vipul Bhrigu and the Federal Definition of Research Misconduct.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (2):411-421.
    The Office of Research Integrity found in 2011 that Vipul Bhrigu, a postdoctoral researcher who sabotaged a colleague’s research materials, was guilty of misconduct. However, I argue that this judgment is ill-considered and sets a problematic precedent for future cases. I first discuss the current federal definition of research misconduct and representative cases of research misconduct. Then, because this case recalls a debate from the 1990s over what the definition of “research misconduct” ought to be, I briefly recapitulate that history (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  11.  24
    Not All Research is Equal: Taking Social Science Research Into Account.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (11):17 – 18.
  12.  20
    Confucianism's Challenge to Western Bioethics.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):73-74.
  13.  25
    The Ethics and Aesthetics of for-Profit Bioethics Consultation.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2005 - HEC Forum 17 (2):94-121.
  14.  11
    Clinical Ethics Consultation's Dilemma, and a Solution.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2011 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 22 (4):380.
    Clinical ethics consultation is on the horns of a dilemma. One horn skewers the field for its lack of standards, while the other horn skewers it for proposing arbitrary or deeply contested foundations. I articulate the dilemma by discussing several critiques of the field and the challenge of formulating standards and suggest that the solution lies, at least until a robust consensus emerges, with establishing a list of proscriptive standards to guide the field.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  15.  40
    Engineering, Gerrymandering and Expertise in Public Bioethics.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2006 - HEC Forum 18 (2):125-130.
  16.  21
    Sinister Innovations: Beware the Co-Optation of Clinical Ethics Consultation. [REVIEW]Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2006 - Journal of Value Inquiry 40 (2-3):235-242.
  17.  13
    Problems with Minimal-Risk Research Oversight: A Threat to Academic Freedom?Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2009 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 31 (3):11.
    A subcommittee of the American Association of University Professors has published a report, “Research on Human Subjects: Academic Freedom and the Institutional Review Board” , which argues that institutional review board oversight may pose a threat to academic freedom, and that a different oversight model based on departmental review would both maintain subject protection and eliminate the threat. But the report does not demonstrate that IRBs pose a threat to academic freedom, and using departmental oversight may not sufficiently protect human (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  18.  59
    Patient Ethics and Responsibilities.Ana Smith Iltis & Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (2):131 – 137.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  19.  60
    Introduction.Lisa M. Rasmussen & Ana Smith Iltis - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (6):617 – 619.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  20.  31
    Morality, Religion and Metaphysics: Diverse Visions in Bioethics.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (4):367 – 377.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  21.  18
    Bioethics and Moral Content: National Traditions of Health Care Morality: Papers Dedicated in Tribute to Kazumasa Hoshino.Kazumasa Hoshino, H. Tristram Engelhardt & Lisa M. Rasmussen (eds.) - 2002 - Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Is there only one bioethics? Is a global bioethics possible? Or, instead, does one encounter a plurality of bioethical approaches shaped by local cultural and national traditions? Some thirty years ago a field of applied ethics emerged under the rubric `bioethics'. Little thought was given at the time to the possibility that this field bore the imprint of a particular American set of moral commitments. This volume explores the plurality of moral perspectives shaping bioethics. It is inspired by Kazumasa Hoshino's (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  3
    Authorship Policies at U.S. Doctoral Universities: A Review and Recommendations for Future Policies.Lisa M. Rasmussen, Courtney E. Williams, Mary M. Hausfeld, George C. Banks & Bailey C. Davis - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (6):3393-3413.
    Intellectual contribution in the form of authorship is a fundamental component of the academic career. While research has addressed questionable and harmful authorship practices, there has largely been no discussion of how U.S. academic institutions interpret and potentially mitigate such practices through the use of institution-level authorship policies. To gain a better understanding of the role of U.S. academic institutions in authorship practices, we conducted a systematic review of publicly available authorship policies for U.S. doctoral institutions, focusing on components such (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  7
    Beyond Belmont—and Beyond Regulations.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (8):19-21.
    Volume 19, Issue 8, August 2019, Page 19-21.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  53
    Book Reviews Veatch, Robert M. Patient, Heal Thyself: How the New Medicine Puts the Patient in Charge . New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. Pp. 304. $29.95 (Cloth). [REVIEW]Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2009 - Ethics 119 (4):801-805.
  25. Clinical Bioethics: Analysis of a Practice.Lisa Marie Rasmussen - 2003 - Dissertation, Rice University
    This project is a philosophical analysis of the practice of bioethics consultation---what might be called the philosophy of bioethics. It assesses claims made about the purposes and appropriate aims of the field, in order to establish whether an identifiable conceptual unity underlies the practice. The conclusion is that no such unity exists. ;The project begins by assessing the history of the field, in the hope that a historical analysis will explain why the field arose at all, which reason could then (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  32
    Christopher Meyers, a Practical Guide to Clinical Ethics Consulting: Expertise, Ethos, and Power. [REVIEW]Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2010 - Journal of Value Inquiry 44 (1):99-102.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  3
    Editorial: International Perspectives on the Baby Trade.Lisa M. Rasmussen & Rosemarie Tong - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (8):ii-iv.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. Families and Individuals in Medical Decision Making.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2015 - In Ruiping Fan (ed.), Family-Oriented Informed Consent. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  29.  8
    H. Tristram Engelhardt, jr.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2002 - In Kazumasa Hoshino, H. Tristram Engelhardt & Lisa M. Rasmussen (eds.), Bioethics and Moral Content: National Traditions of Health Care Morality: Papers Dedicated in Tribute to Kazumasa Hoshino. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 3--1.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  72
    Introduction.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2003 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (4):399 – 401.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  10
    On Internal Accountability in Clinical Ethics Consultation.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (6):43-45.
  32.  8
    Realizing Present and Future Promise of DIY Biology and Medicine Through a Trust Architecture.Lisa M. Rasmussen, Christi J. Guerrini, Todd Kuiken, Camille Nebeker, Alex Pearlman, Sarah B. Ware, Anna Wexler & Patricia J. Zettler - 2020 - Hastings Center Report 50 (6):10-14.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark