Results for 'Lloyd J. Miller'

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  34
    Book Review Section 1. [REVIEW]Maralyn Blachowicz, Lloyd J. Miller, Ezri Atzmon, Brian J. Spittle, Fred C. Rankine, Abdelhady Elsayed Abdu, Stafford Kay, Edward B. Goellner, Jerome F. Megna, Ronald Mark & Robert S. Griffin - 1981 - Educational Studies 12 (1):85-98.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  11
    Book Review Section 1. [REVIEW]Philip G. Altbach, Hilda Calabro, Lloyd J. Miller, Janice Ann Beran, Harvey G. Neufeldt, John Martin Rich, Clinton R. Bunke, John L. Brickell, Glorianne M. Leck & J. J. Chambliss - 1979 - Educational Studies 10 (1):94-113.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  12
    The Hand of the Lord. A Reassessment of the "Ark Narrative" of I Samuel.Lloyd Bailey, Patrick D. Miller & J. J. Roberts - 1979 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 99 (3):471.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  25
    Cardiovascular disease and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug prescribing in the midst of evolving guidelines.Timothy T. Pham, Michael J. Miller, Donald L. Harrison, Ann E. Lloyd, Kimberly M. Crosby & Jeremy L. Johnson - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (6):1026-1034.
  5.  12
    Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries The Ethereal Aether. A History of Michelson-Morley-Miller Aether-Drift Experiments, 1880–1930. By Lloyd S. Swenson Jr Austin: University of Texas Press, 1972. Pp. xxii +361. £4.75. Nineteenth Century Aether Theories. By Kenneth F. Schaffner. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1972. Pp. x + 278. £3.25. [REVIEW]J. O. Marsh - 1974 - British Journal for the History of Science 7 (1):96-97.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  4
    Colleges and commitments.Lloyd J. Averill - 1971 - Philadelphia,: Westminster Press. Edited by William W. Jellema.
    The nature and legitimacy of commitments. Objectivity vs. commitment, by H. Smith. Institutional commitment: a social scientist's view, by H. R. Davis. The sectarian nature of liberal education, by L. J. Averill. The identity of the Christian college, by W. W. Jellema.--Commitments and the dimensions of learning. Discursive truth and evangelical truth, by A. C. Outler. Natural order and transcendent order, by W. G. Pollard. Limited cognition and ultimate cognition, by R. W. Friedrichs. Academic teaching and human experience, by M. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  3
    The Parameters of military ethics.Lloyd J. Matthews & Dale E. Brown (eds.) - 1989 - Washington: Pergamon-Brassey's International Defense Publishers.
    Essays omhandlende den etiske dimension i det militære liv.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Do the Folk Represent Time as Essentially Dynamical?Andrew J. Latham, Kristie Miller & James Norton - 2020 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 1.
    Recent research (Latham, Miller and Norton, forthcoming) reveals that a majority of people represent actual time as dynamical. But do they, as suggested by McTaggart and Gödel, represent time as essentially dynamical? This paper distinguishes three interrelated questions. We ask (a) whether the folk representation of time is sensitive or insensitive: i.e., does what satisfies the folk representation of time in counterfactual worlds depend on what satisfies it actually—sensitive—or does is not depend on what satisfies it actually—insensitive, and (b) (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  9. Miller contro Miller: una polemica.J. Miller & D. Miller - 1996 - Studi di Estetica 13:191-236.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. The community of self.J. Miller M. Mair - 1977 - In D. Bannister (ed.), New Perspectives in Personal Construct Theory. Academic Press. pp. 125--149.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  11.  41
    J. Carlsen, P. Ørsted, J. E. Skydsgaard (edd.): Land Use in the Roman Empire. (Analecta Romana Instituti Danici, Supplement 22.) Pp. 190, ills. Rome: 'L' Erma' di Bretschneider, 1994. Paper. [REVIEW]J. A. Lloyd - 1997 - The Classical Review 47 (02):436-.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  15
    J. Carlsen, P. Ørsted, J. E. Skydsgaard : Land Use in the Roman Empire. Pp. 190, ills. Rome: ‘Ľ Erma’ di Bretschneider, 1994. Paper. [REVIEW]J. A. Lloyd - 1997 - The Classical Review 47 (2):436-436.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  7
    Rethinking Sexuality: Foucault and Classical Antiquity.David H. J. Larmour, Paul Allen Miller & Charles Platter - 2021 - Princeton University Press.
    In this collection of provocative essays, historians and literary theorists assess the influence of Michel Foucault, particularly his History of Sexuality, on the study of classics. Foucault's famous work presents a bold theory of sexuality for both ancient and modern times, and yet until now it has remained under-explored and insufficiently analyzed. By bringing together the historical knowledge, philological skills, and theoretical perspectives of a wide range of scholars, this collection enables the reader to explore Foucault's model of Greek culture (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  14. Exploring Arbitrariness Objections to Time-Biases.Andrew J. Latham, Kristie Miller, Jordan Oh, Sam Shpall & Wen Yu - forthcoming - Journal of the American Philosophical Association.
    There are two kinds of time-bias: near-bias and future-bias. While philosophers typically hold that near-bias is rationally impermissible, many hold that future-bias is rationally permissible. Call this normative hybridism. According to arbitrariness objections, certain patterns of preference are rationally impermissible because they are arbitrary. While arbitrariness objections have been levelled against both near-bias and future-bias, the kind of arbitrariness in question has been different. In this paper we investigate whether there are forms of arbitrariness that are common to both kinds (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  15.  40
    Tripolitania D. J. Mattingly: Tripolitania. Pp. xix + 265, 89 figs, 39 plates. London: Batsford, 1995. Cased, £55. ISBN: 0-7134-5743-2. [REVIEW]J. A. Lloyd - 1997 - The Classical Review 47 (02):362-364.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  26
    Tripolitania - D. J. Mattingly: Tripolitania. Pp. xix + 265, 89 figs, 39 plates. London: Batsford, 1995. Cased, £55. ISBN: 0-7134-5743-2.J. A. Lloyd - 1997 - The Classical Review 47 (2):362-364.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17. Is our naïve theory of time dynamical?Andrew J. Latham, Kristie Miller & James Norton - 2021 - Synthese 198 (5):4251-4271.
    We investigated, experimentally, the contention that the folk view, or naïve theory, of time, amongst the population we investigated is dynamical. We found that amongst that population, ~ 70% have an extant theory of time that is more similar to a dynamical than a non-dynamical theory, and ~ 70% of those who deploy a naïve theory of time deploy a naïve theory that is more similar to a dynamical than a non-dynamical theory. Interestingly, while we found stable results across our (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  18. Hedonic and Non-Hedonic Bias toward the Future.Preston Greene, Andrew J. Latham, Kristie Miller & James Norton - 2021 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 99 (1):148-163.
    It has widely been assumed, by philosophers, that our first-person preferences regarding pleasurable and painful experiences exhibit a bias toward the future (positive and negative hedonic future-bias), and that our preferences regarding non-hedonic events (both positive and negative) exhibit no such bias (non-hedonic time-neutrality). Further, it has been assumed that our third-person preferences are always time-neutral. Some have attempted to use these (presumed) differential patterns of future-bias—different across kinds of events and perspectives—to argue for the irrationality of hedonic future-bias. This (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  19.  14
    Lloyd J. W.. Foundations of logic programming. Symbolic computation. Artifical intelligence. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, and Tokyo, 1984, x + 124 pp. [REVIEW]John C. Shepherdson - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (1):288-289.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  45
    Foundations of Logic Programming.J. W. Lloyd - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (1):288-289.
  21. An Empirical Investigation of the Role of Direction in our Concept of Time.Andrew J. Latham, Kristie Miller & James Norton - 2021 - Acta Analytica 36 (1):25-47.
    This paper empirically investigates one aspect of the folk concept of time by testing how the presence or absence of directedness impacts judgements about whether there is time in a world. Experiment 1 found that dynamists, showed significantly higher levels of agreement that there is time in dynamically directed worlds than in non-dynamical non-directed worlds. Comparing our results to those we describe in Latham et al., we report that while ~ 70% of dynamists say there is time in B-theory worlds, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  22. An Empirical Investigation of Purported Passage Phenomenology.Andrew J. Latham, Kristie Miller & James Norton - 2020 - Journal of Philosophy 117 (7):353-386.
    It has widely been assumed, by philosophers, that most people unambiguously have a phenomenology as of time passing, and that this is a datum that philosophical theories must accommodate. Moreover, it has been assumed that the greater the extent to which people have said phenomenology, the more likely they are to endorse a dynamical theory of time. This paper is the first to empirically test these assumptions. Surprisingly, our results do not support either assumption. One experiment instead found the reverse (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  23. On Preferring that Overall, Things are Worse: Future‐Bias and Unequal Payoffs.Preston Greene, Andrew J. Latham, Kristie Miller & James Norton - 2021 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 105 (1):181-194.
    Philosophers working on time-biases assume that people are hedonically biased toward the future. A hedonically future-biased agent prefers pleasurable experiences to be future instead of past, and painful experiences to be past instead of future. Philosophers further predict that this bias is strong enough to apply to unequal payoffs: people often prefer less pleasurable future experiences to more pleasurable past ones, and more painful past experiences to less painful future ones. In addition, philosophers have predicted that future-bias is restricted to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  24. Future bias in action: does the past matter more when you can affect it?Andrew J. Latham, Kristie Miller, James Norton & Christian Tarsney - 2020 - Synthese 198 (12):11327-11349.
    Philosophers have long noted, and empirical psychology has lately confirmed, that most people are “biased toward the future”: we prefer to have positive experiences in the future, and negative experiences in the past. At least two explanations have been offered for this bias: belief in temporal passage and the practical irrelevance of the past resulting from our inability to influence past events. We set out to test the latter explanation. In a large survey, we find that participants exhibit significantly less (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  25.  20
    Laura J. Miller, Building Nature's Market: The Business and Politics of Natural Food. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2017. Pp. 288. ISBN 978-0-22650-123-9. $105.00. [REVIEW]Thomas P. Weber - 2018 - British Journal for the History of Science 51 (4):714-716.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. There’s No Time Like the Present: Present-Bias, Temporal Attitudes and Temporal Ontology.Natalja Deng, Andrew J. Latham, Kristie Miller & James Norton - forthcoming - In Shaun Nichols & Joshua Knobe (eds.), Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy. OUP.
    This paper investigates the connection between temporal attitudes (attitudes characterised by a concern (or lack thereof) about future and past events), beliefs about temporal ontology (beliefs about the existence of future and past events) and temporal preferences (preferences regarding where in time events are located). Our aim is to probe the connection between these preferences, attitudes, and beliefs, in order to better evaluate the normative status of these preferences. We investigate the hypothesis that there is a three-way association between (a) (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27. Geoffrey Hill and British Poetry, 1956-1986 an Analysis of Poetic Language and Poetic Voice.J. F. Lloyd - 1993
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. Julia Annas, on Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy by Jacques Brunschwig.J. Lloyd - 1996 - European Journal of Philosophy 4:369-372.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29. Translations and Notes by John Stuart Mill. Edited with an Introductory Essay by Ruth Barchardt, Four Dialogues of Plato. [REVIEW]J. M. Lloyd - 1946 - Hibbert Journal 45:186.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30. How Much Do We Discount Past Pleasures?Preston Greene, Andrew J. Latham, Kristie Miller & James Norton - 2022 - American Philosophical Quarterly 59 (4):367-376.
    Future-biased individuals systematically prefer pleasures to be in the future and pains to be in the past. Empirical research shows that negative future-bias is robust: people prefer more past pain to less future pain. Is positive future-bias robust or fragile? Do people only prefer pleasures to be located in the future, compared to the past, when those pleasures are of equal value, or do they continue to prefer that pleasures be located in the future even when past pleasures outweigh future (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  31. Are the Folk Functionalists About Time?Andrew J. Latham & Kristie Miller - 2022 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 60 (2):221-248.
    This paper empirically investigates the contention that the folk concept of time is a functional concept: a concept according to which time is whatever plays a certain functional role or roles. This hypothesis could explain why, in previous research, surprisingly large percentages of participants judge that there is time at worlds that contain no one-dimensional substructure of ordered instants. If it seems to participants that even in those worlds the relevant functional role is played, then this could explain why they (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  32. Our Naïve Representation of Time and of the Open Future.Batoul Hodroj, Andrew J. Latham & Kristie Miller - forthcoming - Dialectica.
    It’s generally thought that we naively or pre-theoretically represent the future to be open. While philosophers have modelled future openness in different ways, it’s unclear which, if any, captures our naïve sense that the future is open. In this paper we focus on just one way the future might count as being open: by being nomically open, and empirically investigate whether our naïve representation of the future as open is partly constituted by representing the future as nomically open. We also (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33. Robust passage phenomenology probably does not explain future-bias.Andrew J. Latham, Kristie Miller, Christian Tarsney & Hannah Tierney - 2022 - Synthese 200 (1):1-23.
    People are ‘biased toward the future’: all else being equal, we typically prefer to have positive experiences in the future, and negative experiences in the past. Several explanations have been suggested for this pattern of preferences. Adjudicating among these explanations can, among other things, shed light on the rationality of future-bias: For instance, if our preferences are explained by unjustified beliefs or an illusory phenomenology, we might conclude that they are irrational. This paper investigates one hypothesis, according to which future-bias (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  34. Time in a one‐instant world.Andrew J. Latham & Kristie Miller - 2020 - Ratio 33 (3):145-154.
    Many philosophers hold that ‘one-instant worlds’—worlds that contain a single instant—fail to contain time. We experimentally investigate whether these worlds satisfy the folk concept of time. We found that ~50% of participants hold that there is time in such worlds. We argue that this suggests one of two possibilities. First, the population disagree about whether at least one of the A-, B-, or C-series is necessary for time, with there being a substantial sub-population for whom the presence of neither an (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  35. Why should historians take archaeology seriously?J. A. Lloyd - 1986 - In John L. Bintliff & Chris F. Gaffney (eds.), Archaeology at the Interface: Studies in Archaeology's Relationships with History, Geography, Biology, and Physical Science. B.A.R..
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36. Why do people represent time as dynamical? An investigation of temporal dynamism and the open future.Andrew J. Latham & Kristie Miller - 2023 - Philosophical Studies 180 (5):1717-1742.
    Deflationists hold that it does not seem to us, in experience, as though time robustly passes. There is some recent empirical evidence that appears to support this contention. Equally, empirical evidence suggests that we naïvely represent time as dynamical. Thus deflationists are faced with an explanatory burden. If, as they maintain, the world seems to us in experience as though it is non-dynamical, then why do we represent time as dynamical? This paper takes up the challenge of investigating, on the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  37. Judgements of Metaphysical Explanations are Context Sensitive.Andrew J. Latham & Kristie Miller - manuscript
    Empirical investigation of the conditions under which people prefer, or disprefer, causal explanation, has suggested to many that our judgements about what causally explains what are context sensitive in a number of ways. This has led many to suppose that whether or not a causal explanation obtains depends on various contextual factors, and that said explanations can obtain in one context, and not in another: they are both subjective and agent-relative. Surprisingly, most accounts of metaphysical explanation suppose there to be (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38. Investigating Non-philosophers’ Judgements about the Asymmetry of Metaphysical Explanation.Andrew J. Latham & Kristie Miller - manuscript
    It is often supposed that metaphysical explanation is asymmetric: that for all x and y, if x metaphysically explains y, then y does not metaphysically explain x. Even amongst those who hold that metaphysical explanation is not asymmetric, but nonsymmetric, it is assumed that a relatively small number of particular explanations are symmetric: by and large, if x metaphysically explains y, then y does not metaphysically explain x. Both parties agree that as a matter of fact we at least typically (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39. End-of-life choices.M. Kleepsies Phillip, J. Miller Pamela & A. Preston Thomas - 2008 - In James L. Werth & Dean Blevins (eds.), Decision Making Near the End of Life: Issues, Development, and Future Directions. Brunner-Routledge.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  24
    Why we should have seen that coming.M. J. Wolf, K. Miller & F. S. Grodzinsky - 2017 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 47 (3):54-64.
    In this paper we examine the case of Tay, the Microsoft AI chatbot that was launched in March, 2016. After less than 24 hours, Microsoft shut down the experiment because the chatbot was generating tweets that were judged to be inappropriate since they included racist, sexist, and anti-Semitic language. We contend that the case of Tay illustrates a problem with the very nature of learning software that interacts directly with the public, and the developer's role and responsibility associated with it. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  41.  82
    Postmodern Public Administration: Toward Discourse.Charles J. Fox & Hugh T. Miller - 1994 - SAGE Publications.
    Charles J Fox and Hugh T Miller challenge current thinking about public policy and administration in the light of the postmodern condition. In this book existing and accepted theories such as public management doctrines, constitutionalism and communitarianism are rejected in favour of constructing a discourse theory of public administration. The book also provides an invaluable, thorough and clear review of the doctrines and philosophies that have to date dominated the field.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  42. Quantum gravity, timelessness, and the folk concept of time.Andrew J. Latham & Kristie Miller - 2020 - Synthese 198 (10):9453-9478.
    What it would take to vindicate folk temporal error theory? This question is significant against a backdrop of new views in quantum gravity—so-called timeless physical theories—that claim to eliminate time by eliminating a one-dimensional substructure of ordered temporal instants. Ought we to conclude that if these views are correct, nothing satisfies the folk concept of time and hence that folk temporal error theory is true? In light of evidence we gathered, we argue that physical theories that entirely eliminate an ordered (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  43. Is it identity all the way down? From supersubstantivalism to composition as identity and back again.Michael J. Duncan & Kristie Miller - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
    We argue that, insofar as one accepts either supersubstantivalism or strong composition as identity for the usual reasons, one has (defeasible) reasons to accept the other as well. Thus, all else being equal, one ought to find the package that combines both views—the Identity Package—more attractive than any rival package that includes one, but not the other, of either supersubstantivalism or composition as identity.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44. Belief in robust temporal passage (probably) does not explain future-bias.Andrew J. Latham, Kristie Miller, Christian Tarsney & Hannah Tierney - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (6):2053-2075.
    Empirical work has lately confirmed what many philosophers have taken to be true: people are ‘biased toward the future’. All else being equal, we usually prefer to have positive experiences in the future, and negative experiences in the past. According to one hypothesis, the temporal metaphysics hypothesis, future-bias is explained either by our beliefs about temporal metaphysics—the temporal belief hypothesis—or alternatively by our temporal phenomenology—the temporal phenomenology hypothesis. We empirically investigate a particular version of the temporal belief hypothesis according to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  45.  21
    Experiential Learning in Organizations: Applications of the Tavistock Group Relations Approach: Contributions in Honour of Eric J. Miller.Laurence J. Gould, Lionel F. Stapley & Mark Stein (eds.) - 2004 - Karnac Books.
    The papers in this book address the broad issues of authority, leadership and organizational culture, whilst concentrating on other issues in-depth, such as inter-group conflict, and gender and race relations in the workplace.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  98
    Lexicalisation and the Origin of the Human Mind.Thomas J. Hughes & J. T. M. Miller - 2014 - Biosemiotics 7 (1):11-27.
    This paper will discuss the origin of the human mind, and the qualitative discontinuity between human and animal cognition. We locate the source of this discontinuity within the language faculty, and thus take the origin of the mind to depend on the origin of the language faculty. We will look at one such proposal put forward by Hauser et al. (Science 298:1569-1579, 2002), which takes the evolution of a Merge trait (recursion) to solely explain the differences between human and animal (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  47.  26
    Clinical pragmatism: Bridging theory and practice.Joseph J. Fins, Franklin G. Miller & Matthew D. Bacchetta - 1998 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (1):37-42.
    : This response to Lynn Jansen's critique of clinical pragmatism concentrates on two themes: (1) contrasting approaches to moral epistemology and (2) the connection between theory and practice in clinical ethics. Particular attention is paid to the status of principles and the role of consensus, with some closing speculations on how Dewey might view the current state of bioethics.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  48.  5
    War After September 11.Benjamin R. Barber, Lloyd J. Dumas, Robert K. Fullinwider, William A. Galston, Paul W. Kahn, Judith Lichtenberg & David Luban - 2002 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    War After September 11 considers the just aims and legitimate limits of the United States' response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  49.  11
    Anxiety and fear.Peter J. Lang, Gregory A. Miller & Daniel N. Levin - 1983 - In Richard J. Davidson, Gary E. Schwartz & D. H. Shapiro (eds.), Consciousness and Self-Regulation. Plenum. pp. 123--151.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  32
    Money and Distorted Ethical Judgments about Research: Ethical Assessment of the TeGenero TGN1412 Trial. [REVIEW]Ezekiel J. Emanuel & Franklin G. Miller - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (2):76-81.
    The recent TeGenero phase I trial of a novel monoclonal antibody in healthy volunteers produced a drastic inflammatory reaction in participants receiving the experimental agent. Commentators on the ethics of the research have focused considerable attention on the role of financial considerations: the for-profit status of the biotechnology company and Contract Research Organization responsible respectively for sponsoring and conducting the trial and the amount of monetary compensation to participants. We argue that these financial considerations are largely irrelevant and distort ethical (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000