Order:
Disambiguations
Lou Goble [33]Louis F. Goble [2]Louis Goble [1]Louis Frank Goble [1]
  1.  37
    The Concept of Moral Obligation.Lou Goble - 1996 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 60 (1):242-244.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   99 citations  
  2.  16
    A Logic for Deontic Dilemmas.Lou Goble - 2005 - Journal of Applied Logic 3 (3-4):461-483.
  3. Paraconsistent Modal Logic.Lou Goble - 2006 - Logique Et Analyse 193:3-29.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  4. Normative Conflicts and the Logic of 'Ought'.Lou Goble - 2009 - Noûs 43 (3):450-489.
    On the face of it, normative conflicts are commonplace. Yet standard deontic logic declares them to be logically impossible. That prompts the question, What are the proper principles of normative reasoning if such conflicts are possible? This paper examines several alternatives that have been proposed for a logic of 'ought' that can accommodate normative conflicts, and finds all of them unsatisfactory as measured against three criteria of adequacy. It then introduces a new logic that does meet all three criteria, and (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  5.  57
    Utilitarian Deontic Logic.Lou Goble - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 82 (3):317 - 357.
  6.  66
    The Logic of Obligation, 'Better' and 'Worse'.Lou Goble - 1993 - Philosophical Studies 70 (2):133 - 163.
  7.  65
    A Logic of Good, Should, and Would.Lou Goble - 1990 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 19 (2):253 - 276.
  8.  55
    Multiplex Semantics for Deontic Logic.Lou Goble - 2000 - Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (2):113-134.
    This multiplex semantics incorporates multiple relations of deontic accessibility or multiple preference rankings on alternative worlds to represent distinct normative standards. This provides a convenient framework for deontic logic that allows conflicts of obligation, due either to conflicts between normative standards or to incoherence within a single standard. With the multiplex structures, two general senses of "ought" may be distinguished, an indefinite sense under which something is obligatory when it is enjoined by some normative standard and a core sense for (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  9.  60
    Murder Most Gentle: The Paradox Deepens.Lou Goble - 1991 - Philosophical Studies 64 (2):217 - 227.
  10. A Logic of "Good, Should", and "Would": Part I.Lou Goble - 1990 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 19 (2):169-199.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  11.  86
    The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic.Lou Goble (ed.) - 2001 - Wiley-Blackwell.
    This volume presents a definitive introduction to twenty core areas of philosophical logic including classical logic, modal logic, alternative logics and close examinations of key logical concepts.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  12. A Logic of "Good, Should", and "Would": Part II.Lou Goble - 1990 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 19 (3):253-276.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  13.  9
    A Logic ofGood, Should, andWould.Lou Goble - 1990 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 19 (3):253-276.
  14.  34
    Combinator Logics.Lou Goble - 2004 - Studia Logica 76 (1):17 - 66.
    Combinator logics are a broad family of substructual logics that are formed by extending the basic relevant logic B with axioms that correspond closely to the reduction rules of proper combinators in combinatory logic. In the Routley-Meyer relational semantics for relevant logic each such combinator logic is characterized by the class of frames that meet a first-order condition that also directly corresponds to the same combinator's reduction rule. A second family of logics is also introduced that extends B with the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  15. A Logic of Better.Lou Goble - 1989 - Logique Et Analyse 32 (27):297-318.
  16.  3
    Mally’s Deontic Logic.Gert-Jan C. Lokhorst & Lou Goble - 2004 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 67 (1):37-57.
    In 1926, Mally presented the first formal system of deontic logic. His system had several consequences which Mally regarded as surprising but defensible. It also, however, has the consequence that A is obligatory if and only if A is the case, which is unacceptable from the point of view of any reasonable deontic logic. We describe Mally's system and discuss how it might reasonably be repaired.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  17.  46
    Neighborhoods for Entailment.Lou Goble - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (5):483-529.
    This paper presents a neighborhood semantics for logics of entailment. It begins with a minimal system Min that expresses the most fundamental assumptions about the entailment relation, and continues by examining various extensions that reflect further assumptions that might be made about entailment. This leads first to the logic B that is the basic relevant logic, and then to more powerful systems. All of these logics are proved to be sound and strongly complete. With B the neighborhood semantics meets the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  18.  62
    `Ought' and Extensionality.Lou Goble - 1996 - Noûs 30 (3):330-355.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  19.  13
    Gentzen Systems for Modal Logic.Louis F. Goble - 1974 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 15 (3):455-461.
  20.  3
    Critical Notices.Lou Goble - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (1):242.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  21.  48
    An Incomplete Relevant Modal Logic.Lou Goble - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (1):103-119.
    The relevant modal logic G is a simple extension of the logic RT, the relevant counterpart of the familiar classically based system T. Using the Routley-Meyer semantics for relevant modal logics, this paper proves three main results regarding G: (i) G is semantically complete, but only with a non-standard interpretation of necessity. From this, however, other nice properties follow. (ii) With a standard interpretation of necessity, G is semantically incomplete; there is no class of frames that characterizes G. (iii) The (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  22.  10
    Being Good and Being Logical: Philosophical Groundwork for a New Deontic Logic.Lou Goble & James Wm Forrester - 1998 - Philosophical Review 107 (2):298.
    Deontic logic ought to be fundamental to ethical theory and the theory of practical reasoning, but, for various reasons, it hasn’t been. James Forrester faults the standard systems themselves; so, in place of standard deontic logic, he proposes a new deontic logic that should, he thinks, serve moral philosophy more adequately.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  23. A New Modal Model.Lou Goble - 1973 - Logique Et Analyse 16 (63):301-310.
  24.  20
    Being Good and Being Logical: Philosophical Groundwork for a New Deontic Logic.Lou Goble - 1998 - Philosophical Review 107 (2):298-300.
    Deontic logic ought to be fundamental to ethical theory and the theory of practical reasoning, but, for various reasons, it hasn’t been. James Forrester faults the standard systems themselves; so, in place of standard deontic logic, he proposes a new deontic logic that should, he thinks, serve moral philosophy more adequately.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  81
    Combinatory Logic and the Semantics of Substructural Logics.Lou Goble - 2007 - Studia Logica 85 (2):171-197.
    The results of this paper extend some of the intimate relations that are known to obtain between combinatory logic and certain substructural logics to establish a general characterization theorem that applies to a very broad family of such logics. In particular, I demonstrate that, for every combinator X, if LX is the logic that results by adding the set of types assigned to X (in an appropriate type assignment system, TAS) as axioms to the basic positive relevant logic B∘T, then (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  21
    Corrigenda: Opacity and the Ought-to-Be.Lou Goble - 1974 - Noûs 8 (2):200.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  56
    Opacity and the Ought-to-Be.Lou Goble - 1973 - Noûs 7 (4):407-412.
  28. Preference Semantics for Deontic Logic. Part I: Simple Models.Lou Goble - 2003 - Logique Et Analyse 46:383-418.
  29. Preference Semantics for Deontic Logic - Part II: Multiplex Models.Lou Goble - 2004 - Logique Et Analyse 47.
  30. Quantified Deontic Logic with Definite Descriptions.Lou Goble - 1994 - Logique Et Analyse 37:229-253.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  14
    Review of Frederick Stoutland (Ed.), Philosophical Probings: Essays on Von Wright's Later Work[REVIEW]Lou Goble - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (7).
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic.Lou Goble - 2006 - Studia Logica 84 (1):163-165.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  33.  16
    The Concept of Moral Obligation.Lou Goble - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (1):242-244.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  11
    A System of Modality.Louis F. Goble - 1971 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 12 (2):225-237.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark