Edited by Hans-Christoph Schmidt am Busch & Christopher Zurn. This volume collects original, cutting-edge essays on the philosophy of recognition by international scholars eminent in the field. By considering the topic of recognition as addressed by both classical and contemporary authors, the volume explores the connections between historical and contemporary recognition research and makes substantive contributions to the further development of contemporary theories of recognition.
Nanotechnology is an important platform technology which will add new features like improved biocompatibility, smaller size, and more sophisticated electronics to neuro-implants improving their therapeutic potential. Especially in view of possible advantages for patients, research and development of nanotechnologically improved neuro implants is a moral obligation. However, the development of brain implants by itself touches many ethical, social and legal issues, which also apply in a specific way to devices enabled or improved by nanotechnology. For researchers developing nanotechnology such issues (...) are rather distant from their daily work in the lab, but as soon as they use their materials or devices in medical applications such as therapy of brain diseases they have to be aware of and deal with them. This paper is intended to raise sensitivity for the ethical, legal and social aspects (ELSA) involved in applying nanotechnology in brain implants or other devices by highlighting the short term problems of testing and clinical trials within the existing regulatory frameworks (A), the short and medium-term questions of risks in the application of the devices (B) and the long-term perspectives related to problems of enhancement (C). To identify and address such issues properly nanotechnologists should involve ethical, legal and social experts and regulatory bodies in their research as early as possible. This will help to remove pressure from regulatory bodies, to settle public concern and to prevent non-acceptable developments for the benefit of the patients. (shrink)
Hegel only published five books in his lifetime, and among them the Phenomenology of Spirit emerges as the most important but also perhaps the most difficult and complex. In this book Ludwig Siep follows the path from Hegel's early writings on religion, love and spirit to the milestones of his 'Jena period'. He shows how the themes of the Phenomenology first appeared in an earlier work, The Difference between Fichte's and Schelling's Systems of Philosophy, and closely examines the direction which (...) Hegel's thought took as he attempted to think through the possibility of a complete system of philosophy. The themes encompassed by the Phenomenology - anti-dualistic epistemology, autonomy, historicality, the sociality of reason - are thoroughly discussed in Siep's subtle and elegantly argued assessment, which appears here in English for the first time. It will be of great interest to all readers studying Hegel's thought. (shrink)
In cultural history the human body has been the object of a great variety of opposing valuations, ranging from "imago dei" to "the devil's tool". At present, the body is commonly regarded as a mere means to fulfill the wishes of its "owner". According to these wishes it can be technically improved in an unlimited way. Against this view the text argues for a conception of the human body as a valuable "common heritage". The "normal" human body as the result (...) of natural and cultural history is an essential condition of the modern social and legal order. The consequences of its technical alteration should be the subject of public debates and common decisions. (shrink)
Despite the defenses of the Berlin writings in recent Fichte-research, the paper argues for a basic change in the fundaments of Fichte’s political philosophy. Although he does not turn from revolution to restauration, he criticizes individualism both in moral and political philosophy and on an ontological level. His later writings advocate the self-overcoming of the individual based on an ontological Neoplatonism in his transcendental philosophy. In view of the legal and political developments of the last two centuries, the early Fichte’s (...) concepts of individual rights, including a right to resistance, and the limits of state power are more relevant today than his late political philosophy.Entgegen der neuerdings häufigen Verteidigungen der politischen Philosophie des Berliner Fichte argumentiert der Text für eine fundamentale Wende nach 1800. Fichte bleibt zwar ein Republikaner und wird kein Anhänger der Restauration. Seine Kritik am Individualismus durchzieht aber die praktische Philosophie und basiert auf einer Rezeption des Neuplatonismus in seiner Transzendentalphilosophie. Nach den Erfahrungen der letzten zwei Jahrhunderte haben die Überlegungen seiner frühen Philosophie zu den Individualrechten, inklusive des Widerstandsrechts und der Beschränkung staatlicher Souveränität, mehr Relevanz für die Gegenwartsphilosophie als die späte politische Philosophie Fichtes. (shrink)