32 found
Order:
See also
Lukáš Bielik
Comenius University
Lukas Bielik
Comenius University
  1. The Demarcation Problem of Laws of Nature.Lukáš Bielik - 2010 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 17 (4):522-549.
    The paper focuses on the problem of identification of laws of nature and their demarcation from other kinds of regularities. The problem is approached from the viewpoint of several metaphysical, epistemological, logical and methodological criteria. Firstly, several dominant approaches to the problem are introduced. Secondly, the logical and semantic explicatory framework – Transparent Intensional Logic – is presented for the sake of clarification of logical forms of sentences that are supposed to express the laws of nature. Finally, a complementary strategy (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  38
    How to Assess Theories of Meaning? Some Notes on the Methodology of Semantics1.Lukáš Bielik - 2012 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 19 (3):325-337.
    The paper presents a two-level approach to an assessment of meaning theories. To begin with, language is distinguished from lan guage-model and, analogously, meaning is discerned from a model of meaning. The first level of a theory assessment is presented as dealing with the relation of a model of meaning to intra-theoretical aims and assumptions of a theory with specific language-model. The second level of assessment concerns ontological, epistemological, logical and other assumptions underlying the respective language-model. Finally, several questions are (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3. The Possibilities and Limits of the Demarcation of Science.Lukas Bielik - 2012 - Filozofia 67 (7):530-544.
  4.  18
    Havraní paradox, logika a metódy testovania.Lukáš Bielik - 2011 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 18 (2):213-225.
    The paper presents the logical milieu of the Paradox of ravens, identified by Hempel in his Studies in the Logic of Confirmation. It deals with Hempel’s interpretations of Nicod’s criterion of confirmation as well as with its inadmissible consequences. I, subsequently, suggest an epistemological and semantic specification of empirical properties, i.e., of their identity; then I formulate a criterion of the test of properties expressed by empirical hypothesis. Finally, I propose a procedural conception of confirmation by means of the testing (...)
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  9
    O definíciách a definovaní.Lukáš Bielik, František Gahér & Marián Zouhar - 2010 - Filozofia 65 (8).
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  3
    „Nová záhada indukcie" a testovanie vlastností.Lukáš Bielik - 2011 - Filozofia 66 (8).
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7.  17
    Abduktívny model (vedeckého) vysvetlenia.Lukáš Bielik - 2012 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 19:5-19.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  36
    Explication, H-D Confirmation, and Simplicity.Lukáš Bielik - 2018 - Erkenntnis 83 (5):1085-1104.
    Explication usually plays the role of the method of language revision. The paper sticks to the Carnapian project of explication and develops some of the formal requirements imposed on the explicatum. However, it departs from Carnap’s view when it comes to how to construe the simplicity condition. It is suggested that in some cases the simplicity condition, which in the Carnapian project plays the derived role with respect to the other three conditions—the similarity, exactness, and fruitfulness conditions—may be substantive for (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  50
    Explikácia: metóda a forma.Lukáš Bielik - 2015 - Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 37 (3):235-252.
    Explikácia patrí medzi kľúčové metódy analytickej filozofie. V tejto práci predstavujem návrh explicitného odlíšenia metódy explikácie od jej výsledku. V nadväznosti na prácu Rudolfa Carnapa sa snažím jeho explikačný projekt rozvinúť. Poukazujem na otvorené problémy Carnapovych kritérií adekvátnej explikácie; ukazujem, v čom sa explikácie od definícií líšia, aká je ich logická forma a ktoré explicitné kroky sú typické pre metódu explikácie. Napokon, približujem dôvody, pre ktoré je možné explikáciu chápať ako reláciu nahradenia medzi významovou charakterizáciou a definíciou určitého druhu.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. E. Weber, J. Van Bouwel, L. De Vreese, Scientific Explanation. [REVIEW]Lukáš Bielik - 2013 - Prolegomena 12 (2):501-503.
  11. E. Zeleňák: Moderné Teórie Vysvetlenia A Príčinnosti.Lukáš Bielik - 2009 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 16 (2):272-277.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. Goodman's Riddle (Unsuccessfully?) Resolved: A Respond to R. Maco.Lukas Bielik - 2013 - Filozofia 68 (4):343-350.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  14
    Hempelove kritériá explanácie V kontexte modelu historickej explanácie.Lukáš Bielik - 2007 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 14 (4):498-517.
    The so-called „Covering Law Model“ of explanation proposed by C. Hempel and R. Oppenheim was claimed to have been applied as an explanatory model in natural sciences as well as in humanities. Several objections were raised against this explanatory model during the second half of 20th century. This article considers the proposed criteria of adequacy of scientific explanation and, in particular, the possibilities and limitations connected with the idea of its applicability in the process of logical reconstruction of historical explanations. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14. J. Searle, Myseľ, Jazyk, Spoločnosť.Lukáš Bielik - 2007 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 14 (3):411-417.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. J. Searle, Rečové Akty.Lukáš Bielik - 2008 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 15 (1):125-133.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16. Modern Theory of Explanation and Causality.Lukas Bielik - 2009 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 16 (2):272-277.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17. M. Zouhar, Problémy Jazyka A Počiatky Analytickej Filozofie.Lukáš Bielik - 2012 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 19 (2):270-276.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. M. Zouhar, Základy Logiky Pre Spoločenskovedné A Humanitné Odbory.Lukáš Bielik - 2009 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 16 (3):414-422.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. On Definitions and Defining.Lukas Bielik, Frantisek Gaher & Marian Zouhar - 2010 - Filozofia 65 (8):719-737.
    The paper deals with some logical, semantic and methodological aspects of defining and definitions. First of all, basic features of the background semantic theory are specified. Next, three different kinds of definitions are distinguished: codifying definitions, objectual analytic definitions and meaning analytic definitions. It is shown that the relationships between the definiendum and the definiens in a given definition differ with respect to these different kinds of definition. Furthermore, it is argued that definitions and defining are intrinsically connected with so (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. On the Presentation of the Raven Paradox and the New Riddle of Induction. A Reply to Eugen Zelenak.Lukas Bielik - 2013 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 20 (2):251-261.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  7
    Reasons Why. [REVIEW]Lukáš Bielik - 2016 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 30 (4):407-409.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. The Abductive Model of (Scientific) Explanation.Lukas Bielik - 2012 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 19 (1).
  23. Testability and Meaning of Observation Terms and Theoretical Terms.Lukas Bielik - 2011 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 18 (3):384-397.
  24.  14
    Testovateľnosť a význam observačných a teoretických termínov.Lukáš Bielik - 2011 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 18 (3):384-397.
    Carnap’s analysis of the language of science had presupposed too close a connection between the semantics and testability. The core problem of the logical empiricist tradition was to show how to provide the interpretation of theoretical terms and hence the explanation of their application to observable entities by means of observation terms. It is argued that the utilization of a much more expressive semantic theory which identifies meanings with hyperintensional entities leads to a clarification of the competencies of semantics and (...)
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  17
    The Indispensability Argument(s) for Induction.Lukáš Bielik - 2015 - Balkan Journal of Philosophy 7 (1):45-54.
    Developing the ideas presented in Jacquette, the paper presents an indispensability argument aimed at justification of induction. First, Hume’s problem of induction is introduced via slightly different reconstructions. Second, several traditional attempts to solve Hume’s problem are presented. Finally, Jacquette’s proposal to justify induction by an indispensability argument is developed. I conclude with presenting a kind of indispensability argument for induction.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. Tomáš Marvan, Otázka Významu. Cesty Analytické Filosofie Jazyka.Lukáš Bielik - 2011 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 18 (1):128-132.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27. " The New Riddle of Induction" and Testing of Qualities.Lukas Bielik - 2011 - Filozofia 66 (8):746-754.
    The paper deals with the New Riddle of Induction set forth by N. Goodman in his Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. The problem is introduced through the definition of grue-predicate. The relation between the grue-hypothesis and empirical evidence is examined. Goodman’s underlying thesis about the neutrality of empirical evidence is undermined. The intelligibility of the idea that disjunctive properties such as Grue can be observed and seen is questioned. A solution of Goodman’s riddle is outlined by means of the definition of (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  21
    Theory-Laden Observations and Empirical Equivalence of Theories.Lukáš Bielik - 2013 - Filozofia 68 (7).
  29. The Prospects of the Concept Match in Hyperintensional Deduction.Lukas Bielik & Frantisek Gaher - 2013 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 20:98-111.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  14
    Využitie pojmu zhoda v hyperintenzionálnej dedukcii.Lukáš Bielik & František Gahér - 2013 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 20 (2):98-111.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  18
    Prečo len (nutné) pravdy ako predpoklady deduktívnych úsudkov?František Gahér & Lukáš Bielik - 2013 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 20 (2):75-97.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. Why Just (Necessary) Truths as Assumptions in Deductive Inferences?Frantisek Gaher & Lukas Bielik - 2013 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 20:75-97.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark