18 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Luke Gelinas [17]Luke C. Gelinas [1]
See also
Luke Gelinas
Albany Medical College
  1.  41
    Using Social Media as a Research Recruitment Tool: Ethical Issues and Recommendations.Luke Gelinas, Robin Pierce, Sabune Winkler, I. Glenn Cohen, Holly Fernandez Lynch & Barbara E. Bierer - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (3):3-14.
    The use of social media as a recruitment tool for research with humans is increasing, and likely to continue to grow. Despite this, to date there has been no specific regulatory guidance and there has been little in the bioethics literature to guide investigators and institutional review boards faced with navigating the ethical issues such use raises. We begin to fill this gap by first defending a nonexceptionalist methodology for assessing social media recruitment; second, examining respect for privacy and investigator (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  2.  10
    When Clinical Trials Compete: Prioritising Study Recruitment.Luke Gelinas, Holly Fernandez Lynch, Barbara E. Bierer & I. Glenn Cohen - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (12):803-809.
    It is not uncommon for multiple clinical trials at the same institution to recruit concurrently from the same patient population. When the relevant pool of patients is limited, as it often is, trials essentially compete for participants. There is evidence that such a competition is a predictor of low study accrual, with increased competition tied to increased recruitment shortfalls. But there is no consensus on what steps, if any, institutions should take to approach this issue. In this article, we argue (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  3.  39
    When and Why Is Research Without Consent Permissible?Luke Gelinas, Alan Wertheimer & Franklin G. Miller - 2016 - Hastings Center Report 46 (2):35-43.
    The view that research with competent adults requires valid consent to be ethical perhaps finds its clearest expression in the Nuremberg Code, whose famous first principle asserts that “the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.” In a similar vein, the United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights states that “no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.” Yet although some formulations of the consent principle allow no exceptions, others hold (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  4.  43
    Nudging, Autonomy, and Valid Consent: Context Matters.Franklin G. Miller & Luke Gelinas - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (6):12-13.
  5. The Problem of Natural Evil I: General Theistic Replies.Luke Gelinas - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (3):533-559.
    I examine different strategies involved in stating anti-theistic arguments from natural evil, and consider some theistic replies. There are, traditionally, two main types of arguments from natural evil: those that purport to deduce a contradiction between the existence of natural evil and the existence of God, and those that claim that the existence of certain types or quantities of natural evil significantly lowers the probability that theism is true. After considering peripheral replies, I state four prominent theistic rebutting strategies: skeptical (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  6.  25
    Rights, Nudging, and the Good of Others.Luke Gelinas - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (11):17-19.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  7.  4
    The Decision to Enroll in a Clinical Trial Should Be Unencumbered.Luke Gelinas & Barbara E. Bierer - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (9):23-25.
    Volume 20, Issue 9, September 2020, Page 23-25.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  8. The Problem of Natural Evil II: Hybrid Replies.Luke Gelinas - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (3):560-574.
    I consider two views that combine different elements of general theistic replies to natural evil, those of Peter van Inwagen and William Hasker. I end with a Hasker-style defense – one that, unlike Hasker's, denies the existence of pointless natural evils – and some brief observations on the direction of future debate.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  9.  18
    On Scarcity and the Value of Clinical Trials.Luke Gelinas, Holly Fernandez Lynch, Barbara E. Bierer & I. Glenn Cohen - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (4):71-73.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  10.  14
    Nonexceptionalism, Research Risks, and Social Media: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Using Social Media as a Research Recruitment Tool: Ethical Issues and Recommendations”.Luke Gelinas, Robin Pierce, Sabune Winkler, Glenn Cohen, Holly Fernandez Lynch & Barbara E. Bierer - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (5):1-3.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  11.  1
    On Measuring Attitudes About Payment for Research.Luke Gelinas - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (12):833-834.
    Significant attention has been given both to the ethics of Controlled Human Infection Model research and the ethics of payment for research participation. However, comparatively little attention has been given to the ethics of paying for participation specifically in CHIM research. Grimwade et al should be commended for thoughtfully addressing this topic and especially for the empirical data collection informing their work, which is too often lacking in discussions of payment for research participation. In what follows I will discuss three (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12.  44
    Frames, Choice-Reversal, and Consent.Luke Gelinas - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (5):1049-1057.
    Recently Jason Hanna has argued that a particular type of susceptibility to framing effects—namely, the tendency to reverse one’s choice between certain logically equivalent frames—invalidates actual tokens of consent. Here I argue that this claim is false: proneness to choice-reversal per se between the relevant types of frames does not invalidate consent.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  20
    Institutions as an Ethical Locus of Research Prioritisation.Luke Gelinas, Holly Fernandez Lynch, Barbara Bierer & I. Glenn Cohen - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (12):816-818.
    Ensuring that clinical trials, once launched, successfully complete and generate useful knowledge is an important and indeed ethically imperative goal, given the risks and burdens borne by research participants. Since there are insufficient willing research participants to power all the trials that are currently undertaken,1 addressing underenrolment will require prioritisation decisions that reduce the number of trials competing for participants. While there are multiple levels at which research priority-setting can and does take place, competition between trials often plays out in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  12
    Social Media as an Ethical Tool for Retention in Clinical Trials.Luke Gelinas & Barbara E. Bierer - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (6):62-64.
    Volume 19, Issue 6, June 2019, Page 62-64.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  6
    COVID-19 and Consent for Research: Navigating During a Global Pandemic.Ran D. Goldman & Luke Gelinas - forthcoming - Clinical Ethics:147775092097180.
    The modern ethical framework demands informed consent for research participation that includes disclosure of material information, as well as alternatives. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic results in illness that often involves rapid deterioration. Despite the urgent need to find therapy, obtaining informed consent for COVID-19 research is needed. The current pandemic presents three types of challenges for investigators faced with obtaining informed consent for research participation: uncertainty over key information to informed consent, time and pressure constraints, and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  96
    God, the Best, and Evil. [REVIEW]Klaas J. Kraay & Luke Gelinas - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239):432-446.
  17.  16
    Mutual Obligations in Research and Withholding Payment From Deceptive Participants.Holly Fernandez Lynch, Luke Gelinas & Emily A. Largent - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (4):85-87.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  33
    In Particular Circumstances Attempting Unproven Interventions Is Permissible and Even Obligatory.Bruce D. White, Luke C. Gelinas & Wayne N. Shelton - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (4):53-55.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark