21 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Luke Semrau [21]Luke Bascome Semrau [1]
See also
Luke Semrau
Georgetown University
  1.  34
    Non-Compliance Shouldn't Be Better.Andrew T. Forcehimes & Luke Semrau - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (1):46-56.
    Agent-relative consequentialism is thought attractive because it can secure agent-centred constraints while retaining consequentialism's compelling idea—the idea that it is always permissible to bring about the best available outcome. We argue, however, that the commitments of agent-relative consequentialism lead it to run afoul of a plausibility requirement on moral theories. A moral theory must not be such that, in any possible circumstance, were every agent to act impermissibly, each would have more reason to prefer the world thereby actualized over the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  41
    Beneficence: Does Agglomeration Matter?Andrew T. Forcehimes & Luke Semrau - 2019 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 36 (1):17-33.
    When it comes to the duty of beneficence, a formidable class of moderate positions holds that morally significant considerations emerge when one's actions are seen as part of a larger series. Agglomeration, according to these moderates, limits the demands of beneficence, thereby avoiding the extremely demanding view forcefully defended by Peter Singer. This idea has much appeal. What morality can demand of people is, it seems, appropriately modulated by how much they have already done or will do. Here we examine (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3.  16
    Thinking Through Utilitarianism: A Guide to Contemporary Arguments.Andrew T. Forcehimes & Luke Semrau - 2019 - Hackett Publishing Company.
    _Thinking Through Utilitarianism: A Guide to Contemporary Arguments_ offers something new among texts elucidating the ethical theory known as Utilitarianism. Intended primarily for students ready to dig deeper into moral philosophy, it examines, in a dialectical and reader-friendly manner, a set of normative principles and a set of evaluative principles leading to what is perhaps the most defensible version of Utilitarianism. With the aim of laying its weaknesses bare, each principle is serially introduced, challenged, and then defended. The result is (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  25
    Reassessing the Likely Harms to Kidney Vendors in Regulated Organ Markets.Luke Semrau - 2017 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 42 (6):634-652.
    Julian Koplin, drawing extensively on empirical data, has argued that vendors, even in well-regulated kidney markets, are likely to be significantly harmed. I contend that his reasoning to this conclusion is dangerously mistaken. I highlight two failures. First, Koplin is insufficiently attentive to the differences between existing markets and the regulated markets proposed by advocates. On the basis of this error, he wrongly concludes that many harms will persist even in a well-regulated system. Second, Koplin misunderstands the utilitarian assessment of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  5.  11
    The Best Argument Against Kidney Sales Fails.Luke Semrau - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (6):443-446.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  6. Kidneys Save Lives: Markets Would Probably Help.Luke Semrau - 2014 - Public Affairs Quarterly 28 (1):71-93.
  7.  64
    The Difference We Make.Andrew T. Forcehimes & Luke Semrau - 2015 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 9 (2):1-7.
    Felix Pinkert has proposed a solution to the no-difference problem for AC. He argues that AC should be supplemented with a requirement that agents’ optimal acts be modally robust. We disagree.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  8.  15
    When the Patina of Empirical Respectability Wears Off: Motivational Crowding and Kidney Sales.Luke Semrau - 2019 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 22 (5):1055-1071.
    An increasingly common objection to kidney sales holds that the introduction of monetary incentives may undermine potential donors’ altruism, discourage donation, and possibly result in a net reduction in the supply of kidneys. To explain why incentives might be counterproductive in this way market opponents marshal evidence from behavioral economics. In particular, they claim that the context of kidney sales is ripe for motivational crowding. This reasoning, if sound, would have a profound influence on the debate over kidney sales. What’s (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9.  64
    Are There Distinctively Moral Reasons?Andrew T. Forcehimes & Luke Semrau - 2018 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (3):699-717.
    A dogma of contemporary normative theorizing holds that some reasons are distinctively moral while others are not. Call this view Reasons Pluralism. This essay looks at four approaches to vindicating the apparent distinction between moral and non-moral reasons. In the end, however, all are found wanting. Though not dispositive, the failure of these approaches supplies strong evidence that the dogma of Reasons Pluralism is ill-founded.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  10.  14
    Misplaced Paternalism and Other Mistakes in the Debate Over Kidney Sales.Luke Semrau - 2017 - Bioethics 31 (3):190-198.
    Erik Malmqvist defends the prohibition on kidney sales as a justifiable measure to protect individuals from harms they have not autonomously chosen. This appeal to ‘group soft paternalism’ requires that three conditions be met. It must be shown that some vendors will be harmed, that some will be subject to undue pressure to vend, and that we cannot feasibly distinguish between the autonomous and the non-autonomous. I argue that Malmqvist fails to demonstrate that any of these conditions are likely to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  11.  12
    Misplaced Paternalism and Other Mistakes in the Debate Over Kidney Sales.Luke Semrau - 2016 - Bioethics 30 (9).
    Erik Malmqvist defends the prohibition on kidney sales as a justifiable measure to protect individuals from harms they have not autonomously chosen. This appeal to ‘group soft paternalism’ requires that three conditions be met. It must be shown that some vendors will be harmed, that some will be subject to undue pressure to vend, and that we cannot feasibly distinguish between the autonomous and the non-autonomous. I argue that Malmqvist fails to demonstrate that any of these conditions are likely to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  12.  20
    Actualism Doesn’T Have Control Issues: A Reply to Cohen and Timmerman.Andrew T. Forcehimes & Luke Semrau - 2019 - Philosophia 47 (1):271-277.
    Recently, Cohen and Timmerman, 1–18, 2016) argue that actualism has control issues. The view should be rejected, they claim, as it recognizes a morally irrelevant distinction between counterfactuals over which agents exercise the same kind of control. Here we reply on behalf of actualism.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  3
    Relationship Sensitive Consequentialism Is Regrettable in Advance.Andrew T. Forcehimes & Luke Semrau - forthcoming - Social Theory and Practice.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  18
    Relationship Sensitive Consequentialism Is Regrettable.Andrew T. Forcehimes & Luke Semrau - 2020 - Social Theory and Practice 46 (2):257-276.
    Personal relationships matter. Traditional Consequentialism, given its exclusive focus on agent-neutral goodness, struggles to account for this fact. A recent variant of the theory—one incorporating agent-relativity—is thought to succeed where its traditional counterpart fails. Yet, to secure this advantage, the view must take on certain normative and evaluative commitments concerning personal relationships. As a result, the theory permits cases in which agents do as they ought, yet later ought to prefer that they had done otherwise. That a theory allows such (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  42
    Well-Being: Reality's Role.Andrew T. Forcehimes & Luke Semrau - 2016 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2 (3):456-68.
    A familiar objection to mental state theories of well-being proceeds as follows: Describe a good life. Contrast it with one identical in mental respects, but lacking a connection to reality. Then observe that mental state theories of well-being implausibly hold both lives in equal esteem. Conclude that such views are false. Here we argue this objection fails. There are two ways reality may be thought to matter for well-being. We want to contribute to reality, and we want our experience of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  11
    A Mistake in the Commodification Debate.Luke Semrau - 2017 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 3 (3):354-371.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  6
    Christopher Woodard: Taking Utilitarianism Seriously: Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2019. ISBN: 9780198732624, $65, HbK.Luke Semrau - 2020 - Journal of Value Inquiry 54 (4):663-668.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  16
    Markets Without Limits: Moral Virtues and Commercial Interests, Jason Brennan and Peter Jaworski. Routledge, 2016, Xii +239 Pages. [REVIEW]Luke Semrau - 2017 - Economics and Philosophy 33 (2):326-332.
  19.  7
    Organ Donor or Gratuitous Moral Failure? Pick One.Luke Semrau - 2018 - Think 17 (50):85-89.
    Many are unwilling to donate their vital organs in death. To affirm this choice is to prefer the integrity of one's corpse over possibly saving and improving the lives of others. This position enjoys no sound defence. Refusing to donate amounts to a gratuitous moral failure.Export citation.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  4
    Understanding Choice, Pressure and Markets in Kidneys.Luke Semrau - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (4):277-278.
    Here, I briefly respond to a recent paper by Julian Koplin, in which he criticises my earlier work in this journal. I show that Koplin has misunderstood the distinction I have made between pressure to vend and pressure with the option to vend. I also show that his pessimism about the market regulations I favour is unwarranted.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  33
    Your Mom Does Not Love You for Who You Are.Luke Semrau - 2015 - Think 14 (39):95-97.