Order:
Disambiguations
Mayda Hočevar [3]M. Hocevar [1]Marko Hočevar [1]
  1. Deber Jurídico y Deber Moral En El Pensamiento de John Finnis.M. Hocevar - 2007 - In Josep J. Moreso (ed.), Legal Theory: Legal Positivism and Conceptual Analysis: Proceedings of the 22nd Ivr World Congress, Granada 2005, Volume I = Teoría Del Derecho: Positivismo Jurídico y Análisis Conceptual. Franz Steiner Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  22
    El Primer principio de la razón práctica en la teoría de la Ley natural de John Finnis.Mayda Hocevar - 2005 - Dikaiosyne 8 (15).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  46
    La justicia según J. Finnis.Mayda Hocevar - 2007 - Dikaiosyne 10 (18).
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  5
    Art as Praxis: Danko Grlić’s Conception of Art Beyond Technological Determinism.Marko Hočevar - 2020 - Thesis Eleven 159 (1):96-109.
    The article explores the specific conception of art developed by Danko Grlić, a prominent member of the Yugoslav Praxis School. Grlić conceptualised art beyond both aesthetic norms and technological determinism. Within the context of praxis philosophy, a distinct theory of the subject and a Marxist humanist approach, he reconceptualised art as a distinct type of praxis, a revolutionary and creative practice of changing existing living conditions. The article explains how his unique understanding of art leads Grlić to analyse, criticise and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  28
    Central and Peripheral Cases and the Moral Point of View in John Finnis´ Theory of Law.Mayda Hočevar - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 40:47-52.
    In Finnis´s methodology it is very important to build the appropriate concepts to describe, analyse and define law. As a natural law theorist Finnis goes beyond Hart when considering that the internal point of view is useless for delimiting what law is if one does not define the internal point of view of the internal point of view, that is, the moral point of view. Only from a moral point of view it is possible, according to Finnis, to build an (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark