Order:
Disambiguations
Miloš Taliga [20]M. Taliga [6]Milo Taliga [1]
  1.  24
    How to make critical rationalism comprehensive and non-paradoxical.Miloš Taliga - 2022 - Synthese 200 (5):1-15.
    In this paper, I try to show how the ambition of William Bartley, the founder of comprehensively critical rationalism, can be realized, i.e. how critical rationalism can be comprehensive. I argue that the alleged paradox of comprehensively critical rationalism, formulated, among others, by Bartley himself, depends on a faulty understanding of criticizability. I therefore propose a new understanding of criticizability, and argue that under the new understanding there is no paradox of comprehensively critical rationalism. Finally, I try to explain how (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2. Against Watkins: From a Popperian Point of View.Miloš Taliga - 2004 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 11 (2):143-157.
    Tento článok pojednáva o Watkinsovom útoku na Popperovu teóriu vedy . Watkins tvrdí, že Popperova teória pravdeblízkosti zavádza do PTV justifikacionistické a induktivistické prvky. Cieľom článku je ukázať nepravdivosť Watkinsovej obžaloby. V PTV niet žiadneho dobrého dôvodu pre žiadnu domnienku. Podobne, neexistuje tu ani žiadny „induktívny spôsob“ získavania domnienok.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  3.  41
    Why Verisimilitude Should Not Be Dependent on Conceptual Systems.Miloš Taliga - 2008 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 15 (2):191-205.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  4. O jazykovej závislosti niektorých ocenení pravdeblízkosti.M. Taliga - 2007 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 14 (2):187-200.
    The aim of the paper is to restate the problem of language dependence as first invented by D. Miller against Tichý’s approach to the problem of verisimilitude. The question is whether the verisimilitude appraisals can be dependent on language in which they are formulated in the sense that this dependence could determine their truth values. If the answer is “Yes”, one of the consequences is that one language, when compared with some other one, may lead to different verisimilitude appraisals in (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5.  18
    What else is knowledge if not justified true belief?Miloš Taliga - 2023 - Filosoficky Casopis 71 (3):475-488.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  5
    Lakatos vs. Popper (Lakatos vs. Popper).Miloš Taliga - 2010 - Filosofie Dnes 2 (1):29-43.
    Cieľom tohto článku nie je, primárne, rozobrať Popperovu teóriu vedy, ale 1. predstaviť Lakatosove námietky proti tejto teórii; 2. kriticky ich analyzovať z hľadiska Popperovej teórie; a 3. vysvetliť, prečo justifikacionista Lakatos nemohol oceniť Popperov skepticizmus.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  16
    (1 other version)Realizmus a princíp empirizmu1.Miloš Taliga - 2012 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 19:273-290.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  8.  14
    (1 other version)O kognitívnych prienikoch umenia a vedy.Michal Šedík & Miloš Taliga - 2010 - Filozofia 65 (7).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9. Břetislav Fajkus, Současná filozofie a metodologie vědy.Miloš Taliga - 2003 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 10 (2):234-236.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  66
    Causality, Truth, and Reality.M. Taliga - 2010 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 17 (4):488-507.
    The paper tries to analyze critically what is usually taken for granted – the causal relation between empirical knowledge about external world and the world which is (supposedly) known. The aim is neither to propose a new definition of knowledge nor to restate an old one but rather to take a closer look at the claim that knowledge is a true belief caused in a proper way by facts, events, etc. of the external world. This claim is a core of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. Causal Theories of Knowledge Undermined.Milos Taliga - 2009 - Epistemologia 32 (1):111.
  12. Difference and order (from classical philosophy to postmodernist theories)-A comment.M. Taliga - 2002 - Filozofia 57 (1):63-64.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  19
    (1 other version)Epistemická požiadavka vedeckého realizmu vo svetle Duhem-Quinovej tézy.Miloš Taliga - 2013 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 20 (1):178-195.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  4
    Načo je dobrý sociálny obrat v epistemológii?Miloš Taliga - 2011 - Filosofie Dnes 3 (1):37-54.
    Abstrakt/Abstract Článok argumentuje, že idea tzv. sociálneho obratu, ktorá pochádza z dielne normatívneho pragmatizmu a ktorú v jednom zo svojich textov propaguje aj Vojtech Kolman, neprináša žiadne ovocie, ak je prenesená do oblasti epistemológie. V závere článku je preto načrtnutá alternatívna interpretácia idey sociálneho obratu a jej dôsledky pre epistemológiu. The paper argues that the idea of the so-called social turn introduced by normative pragmatism, and promoted also by Vojtech Kolman in one of his papers, bears no fruit when transferred (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. (1 other version)Nekonečný príbeh zdôvodňovania.Miloš Taliga - 2009 - Filosoficky Casopis 57:353-374.
    [The neverending story of justification].
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  16. On the Uselessness of Justification for a Meaningful Critical Debate (A Response to F. Gaher and M. Szapuova).Milos Taliga - 2013 - Filozofia 68 (7):606-614.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  4
    (1 other version)Paradox skepticizmu.Milo Taliga - 2010 - Filozofia 65:695-705.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Through a Glass Darkly: A Final Rejoinder to Raclavský.Miloš Taliga & David Miller - 2008 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 15 (4):473-476.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  7
    Vedecké poznávanie a pragma-dialektika.Miloš Taliga - 2023 - Filozofia 78 (8):675-688.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  40
    Why the Objectivist Interpretation of Falsification Matters.Miloš Taliga - 2016 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 46 (4):335-351.
    The article distinguishes between subjectivist and objectivist interpretations of scientific method, links subjectivism with good reasons, and argues its uselessness for our understanding of science. It applies the distinction to the method of falsification, explains why objectivism regards falsification to be conjectural, immune to the Duhem–Quine thesis, and immune to the problem of underdetermination. It confronts the falsifying mode of inference with the fallacy of begging the question and with the paradox of inference, and suggests how modus tollens helps scientists (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark