7 found
Order:
  1. Communication Without Sense.Manuel Campos - 2003 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 22 (1-2):5-21.
    Different authors of Fregean inspiration have argued recently for the need of resorting to senses in order to explain successful communication. Such arguments have led some philosophers to develop theories of sense which include some of the externalist insights brought up by neo-Russellians. In this paper, we argue that these theories of sense don't work. We also present a broadly neo-Russellian account that explains away Fregean puzzles on communication without resource to entities like senses.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  84
    Analyticity and Incorrigibility.Manuel Campos - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (3):689-708.
    The traditional point of view on analyticity implies that truth in virtue only of meaning entails a priori acceptability and vice versa. The argument for this claim is based on the idea that meaning as it concerns truth and meaning as it concerns competence are one and the same thing. In this paper I argue that the extensions of these notions do not coincide. I hold that truth in virtue of meaning— truth for semantic reasons—doesn't imply a priori acceptability, and (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  68
    Kim on the Exclusion Problem.Manuel Campos - 1995 - Philosophical Issues 6:167-70.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  12
    Content and Sense.Lydia Sánchez & Manuel Campos - 2009 - Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 1 (1):75-90.
  5.  6
    Object Recognition and Content.Lydia Sánchez & Manuel Campos - 2011 - Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 2 (2):207-226.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Analyticity and Incorrigibility.Manuel Campos - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (3):689-708.
    The traditional point of view on analyticity implies that truth in virtue only of meaning entails a priori acceptability and vice versa. The argument for this claim is based on the idea that meaning as it concerns truth and meaning as it concerns competence are one and the same thing. In this parer I argue that the extensions of these notions do not coincide. I hold that truth in virtue of meaning---truth for semantic reasons--doesn’t imply a priori acceptability, and that (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Analyticity Revisited.Manuel Campos - 1998 - Dissertation, Stanford University
    This dissertation focuses on the topic of analyticity. The traditional concept of analyticity characterizes analytic sentences in at least two ways. On the one hand, these sentences are thought to be true in virtue only of the meaning of the expressions that constitute them. On the other hand, they are thought to be such that they can be concluded by competent speakers in an a priori fashion--that is, merely on the basis of the speakers' knowledge of the meaning of the (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography