9 found
See also
  1.  52
    The Harm Argument Against Surrogacy Revisited: Two Versions Not to Forget.Marcus Agnafors - 2014 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (3):357-363.
    It has been a common claim that surrogacy is morally problematic since it involves harm to the child or the surrogate—the harm argument. Due to a growing body of empirical research, the harm argument has seen a decrease in popularity, as there seems to be little evidence of harmful consequences of surrogacy. In this article, two revised versions of the harm argument are developed. It is argued that the two suggested versions of the harm argument survive the current criticism against (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  37
    Mixing Interest and Control? Assessing Peter Vallentyne’s Hybrid Theory of Rights.Marcus Agnafors - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (4):933-949.
    The relationship between libertarianism and state is a contested one. Despite pressing full and strict ownership of one’s person and any justly acquired goods, many libertarians have suggested ways in which a state, albeit limited, can be regarded as just. Peter Vallentyne has proposed that all plausible versions of libertarianism are compatible with what he calls ‘private-law states’. His proposal is underpinned by a particular conception of rights, which brings Interest Theory of rights and Will Theory of rights together. If (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
  3.  13
    On Disjunctive Rights.Marcus Agnafors - 2017 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 55 (2):141-157.
    This article examines the idea of disjunctive rights—an idea first suggested by Joel Feinberg and more recently advocated by Richard Arneson. Using a hypothetical scenario to bring forward a conflict between two rights that cannot be simultaneously fulfilled, the suggestion that the conflict can be solved by describing the right-holders as holding disjunctive rights—rights that involve, in a significant way, a disjunction—is scrutinized. Several interpretations of the idea of disjunctive rights are examined from the perspectives of the interest theory and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
  4.  16
    Quality of Government: Toward a More Complex Definition.Marcus Agnafors - unknown
  5.  5
    Self-Ownership, the Conflation Problem, and Presumptive Libertarianism: Can the Market Model Support Libertarianism Rather Than the Other Way Around?Marcus Agnafors - 2015 - Libertarian Papers 7.
    David Sobel has recently argued that libertarian theories that accept full and strict self-ownership as foundational confront what he calls the conflation problem: if transgressing self-ownership is strictly and stringently forbidden, it is implied that the normative protection against one infringement is precisely as strong as against any other infringement. But this seems to be an absurd consequence. In defense of libertarianism, I argue that the conflation problem can be handled in a way that allows us to honor basic libertarian (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
  6.  23
    When Do We Share Moral Norms?Marcus Agnafors - 2012 - Journal of Value Inquiry 46 (3):303-315.
    Direct download (6 more)  
    Export citation  
  7.  26
    A Critical Comment on Collste.Marcus Agnafors - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (2):203-205.
    This article claims that the account of specification as a way to solve conflicts between rights, suggested by Göran Collste, is unsatisfactory. It is argued that specification is not a solution on its own, but is better described as a remedy in response to a political failure.
    Direct download (8 more)  
    Export citation  
  8.  5
    Quality of Government and the Treatment of Immigrants.Marcus Agnafors - unknown
  9. The Ethics of Free Soloing.Marcus Agnafors - 2010 - In Stephen E. Schmid (ed.), Climbing - Philosophy for Everyone: Because It's There. Wiley-Blackwell.