11 found
Order:
  1.  26
    Matthew DeCamp (2007). Scrutinizing Global Short-Term Medical Outreach. Hastings Center Report 37 (6):21-23.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  2.  18
    Matthew DeCamp (2011). Ethical Review of Global Short-Term Medical Volunteerism. HEC Forum 23 (2):91-103.
    Global short-term medical volunteerism is growing, and properly conducted, is a tool in the fight for greater global health equity. It is intrinsically ethical (i.e., it involves ethics at every step) and depends upon ethical conduct for its success. At present, ethical guidelines remain in their infancy, which presents a unique opportunity. This paper presents a set of basic ethical principles, building on prior work in this area and previously developed guidelines for international clinical research. The content of these principles, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  3. Allen Buchanan & Matthew DeCamp (2006). Responsibility for Global Health. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (1):95-114.
    There are several reasons for the current prominence of global health issues. Among the most important is the growing awareness that some risks to health are global in scope and can only be countered by global cooperation. In addition, human rights discourse and, more generally, the articulation of a coherent cosmopolitan ethical perspective that acknowledges the importance of all persons, regardless of where they live, provide a normative basis for taking global health seriously as a moral issue. In this paper (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  4. Kevin R. Riggs & Matthew DeCamp (2014). Physicians' Dual Agency, Stewardship, and Marginally Beneficial Care. American Journal of Bioethics 14 (9):49-51.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  2
    Matthew DeCamp & Allen Buchanan (2009). Pharmacogenomics: Ethical and Regulatory Issues. In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. OUP Oxford
    While acknowledging the potential benefits of pharmacogenomics as a methodology, a number of comprehensive reports in the past several years examine a multitude of ethical, legal, and social factors that may limit the extent to which these benefits are realized — and realized in ethically acceptable ways. This article aims to identify and explore the most basic ethical and regulatory issues that are likely to arise if pharmacogenomics becomes widely enough used to have a significant impact on research and clinical (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Matthew DeCamp & Allen Buchanan (2007). Pt. VI. Genetics and Enhancement. Population Genetic Research and Screening: Conceptual and Ethical Issues / Eric Juengst ; Enhancement / Thomas Murray ; Genetic Interventions and the Ethics of Enhancement of Human Beings / Julian Savulescu ; Pharmacogenomics: Ethical and Regulatory Issues. [REVIEW] In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7.  3
    Matthew DeCamp (2015). Review of Wanda Teays, John-Stewart Gordon, and Alison Dundes Renteln, Eds., Global Bioethics and Human Rights: Contemporary Issues. [REVIEW] American Journal of Bioethics 15 (2):3-4.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  3
    Matthew DeCamp, Jennifer K. Walter & Susan Dorr Goold (2011). Conjectural Mixed Motives. Hastings Center Report 41 (1):11-12.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  1
    Matthew DeCamp (2012). A Sufficient Limit to “Reasonable” Choices. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):36 - 38.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 8, Page 36-38, August 2012.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Matthew DeCamp (2011). Commentary. Hastings Center Report 41 (1):11-12.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Matthew DeCamp, Jennifer K. Walter & Susan Dorr Goold (forthcoming). Case Study: Conjectural Mixed Motives. Hastings Center Report.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography