12 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Matthew H. Haber [10]Matthew Haber [2]
See also:
Profile: Matt Haber (University of Utah)
  1.  7
    Matthew H. Haber (2016). The Individuality Thesis. Biology and Philosophy 31 (6):913-930.
    I spell out and update the individuality thesis, that species are individuals, and not classes, sets, or kinds. I offer three complementary presentations of this thesis. First, as a way of resolving an inconsistent triad about natural kinds; second, as a phylogenetic systematics theoretical perspective; and, finally, as a novel recursive account of an evolved character. These approaches do different sorts of work, serving different interests. Presenting them together produces a taxonomy of the debates over the thesis, and isolates ways (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  10
    Matthew H. Haber & Bryan Benham (2012). Reframing the Ethical Issues in Part-Human Animal Research: The Unbearable Ontology of Inexorable Moral Confusion. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (9):17-25.
    Research that involves the creation of animals with human-derived parts opens the door to potentially valuable scientific and therapeutic advances, yet invokes unsettling moral questions. Critics and champions alike stand to gain from clear identification and careful consideration of the strongest ethical objections to this research. A prevailing objection argues that crossing the human/nonhuman species boundary introduces inexorable moral confusion (IMC) that warrants a restriction to this research on precautionary grounds. Though this objection may capture the intuitions of many who (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  3.  29
    Matthew H. Haber (2012). How to Misidentify a Type Specimen. Biology and Philosophy 27 (6):767-784.
  4. Andrew Hamilton, Nathan Smith & Matthew Haber (2009). Social Insects and the Individuality Thesis: Cohesion and the Colony as a Selectable Individual. In Juergen Gadau & Jennifer Fewell (eds.), Organization of Insect Societies: From Genome to Sociocomplexity. Harvard
  5.  31
    James Griesemer, Matthew H. Haber, Grant Yamashita & Lisa Gannett (2005). Critical Notice: Cycles of Contingency – Developmental Systems and Evolution. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 20 (2-3):517-544.
    The themes, problems and challenges of developmental systems theory as described in Cycles of Contingency are discussed. We argue in favor of a robust approach to philosophical and scientific problems of extended heredity and the integration of behavior, development, inheritance, and evolution. Problems with Sterelny's proposal to evaluate inheritance systems using his `Hoyle criteria' are discussed and critically evaluated. Additional support for a developmental systems perspective is sought in evolutionary studies of performance and behavior modulation of fitness.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  6.  28
    Andrew Hamilton & Matthew Haber (2006). Clades Are Reproducers. Biological Theory 1 (4):381-391.
    Exploring whether clades can reproduce leads to new perspectives on general accounts of biological development and individuation. Here we apply James Griesemer's general account of reproduction to clades. Griesemer's account of reproduction includes a requirement for development, raising the question of whether clades may bemeaningfully said to develop. We offer two illustrative examples of what clade development might look like, though evaluating these examples proves difficult due to the paucity of general accounts of development. This difficulty, however, is instructive about (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  7.  15
    Matthew H. Haber (2014). In Defense of the Organism. Biology and Philosophy 29 (6):885-895.
    Thomas Pradeu’s The Limits of the Self provides a precise account of biological identity developed from the central concepts of immunology. Yet the central concepts most relevant to this task are themselves deemed inadequate, suffering from ambiguity and imprecision. Pradeu seeks to remedy this by proposing a new guiding theory for immunology, the continuity theory. From this, an account of biological identity is provided in terms of uniqueness and individuality, ultimately leading to a defense of the heterogeneous organism as expressing (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  21
    Melinda Fagan, Patrick Forber, Vivette GarcÍa Deister, Matthew H. Haber, Andrew Hamilton & Grant Yamashita (2005). Meeting Report: First ISHPSSB Off-Year Workshop. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 20 (4):927-929.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  9
    Matthew H. Haber (2013). Species Problems. Metascience 22 (2):339-342.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  2
    Matthew H. Haber & Madeline Bannon (2015). Mitochondrial Diversity and the Reversal Test. American Journal of Bioethics 15 (6):23-24.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  11
    Matthew H. Haber & Andrew Hamilton (2009). Clade Selection and Levels of Lineage: A Reply to Rieppel. Biological Theory 4 (2):214-218.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  8
    Matthew H. Haber (2005). Book Review the Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 72 (3):491-494.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography