4 found
Order:
  1. On Herbert J. Phillips’s “Why Be Rational?”.Max Harris Siegel - 2015 - Ethics 125 (3):826-828,.
    In recent metaethics, moral realists have advanced a companions-in-guilt argument against moral nihilism. Proponents of this argument hold that the conclusion that there are no categorical normative reasons implies that there are no epistemic reasons. However, if there are no epistemic reasons, there are no epistemic reasons to believe nihilism. Therefore, nihilism is false or no one has epistemic reasons to believe it. While this argument is normally presented as a reply to Mackie, who introduced the term “companions-in-guilt” in his (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  28
    Why Is There Philosophy of Mathematics at All? by Ian Hacking.Max Harris Siegel - 2016 - Mind 125 (497):252-256.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Ian Hacking, Why Is There Philosophy of Mathematics at All? [REVIEW]Max Harris Siegel - forthcoming - Mind 124.
  4.  90
    Robert Audi, Moral Perception (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013), xii+180 pp., $35. [REVIEW]Max Harris Siegel - 2014 - Ratio 27 (2):238-244.