Max Harris Siegel [4]Max Siegel [3]
See also
Max Siegel
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  1.  92
    Priority Monism Is Contingent.Max Siegel - 2016 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):23-32.
    This paper raises a challenge to Jonathan Schaffer's priority monism. I contend that monism may be true at the actual world but fail to hold as a matter of metaphysical necessity, contrary to Schaffer's view that monism, if true, is necessarily true. My argument challenges Schaffer for his reliance on contingent physical truths in an argument for a metaphysically necessary conclusion. A counterexample in which the actual laws of physics hold but the physical history of the universe is different shows (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  2. Ian Hacking, Why Is There Philosophy of Mathematics at All? [REVIEW]Max Harris Siegel - forthcoming - Mind 124.
  3. On Herbert J. Phillips’s “Why Be Rational?”.Max Harris Siegel - 2015 - Ethics 125 (3):826-828,.
    In recent metaethics, moral realists have advanced a companions-in-guilt argument against moral nihilism. Proponents of this argument hold that the conclusion that there are no categorical normative reasons implies that there are no epistemic reasons. However, if there are no epistemic reasons, there are no epistemic reasons to believe nihilism. Therefore, nihilism is false or no one has epistemic reasons to believe it. While this argument is normally presented as a reply to Mackie, who introduced the term “companions-in-guilt” in his (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
    Export citation  
  4.  68
    Robert Audi, Moral Perception , Xii+180 Pp., $35.Max Harris Siegel - 2014 - Ratio 27 (2):238-244.
  5.  34
    Reorganization Impasse.Max Siegel, Nicholas Cummings, Rogers Wright, Suzanne Sobel & Wilbur Morely - 1987 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 7 (1):30-33.
    For over a decade, we have watched the state affairs/practitioner constituency within the American Psychological Association move steadily to become the single largest group—clearly a majority—within the membership ranks of the association. Over the same period of time and as the obverse of related demographic phenomena, the research/academic constituency has shrunk to around 30% of the membership. Since power over the affairs of and the destiny of APA has traditionally resided in the hands of the latter, it probably would have (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
  6. Revising the Principle of Alternate Possibilities.Max Siegel - 2013 - Stance 6:15-20.
    This paper examines the position in moral philosophy that Harry Frankfurt calls the Principle of Alternate Possibilities (PAP). The paper first describes the principle as articulated by A.J. Ayer. Subsequently, the paper examines Frankfurt’s critique and proposed revision of the principle and argues that Frankfurt’s proposal relies on an excessively simplistic account of practical reasoning, which fails to account for the possibility of moral dilemmas. In response, the paper offers a further revision of PAP, which accounts for Frankfurt’s critique, moral (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
  7.  19
    Why Is There Philosophy of Mathematics at All? By Ian Hacking.Max Harris Siegel - 2016 - Mind 125 (497):252-256.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation