7 found
Order:
  1.  25
    Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation - the Development of an Evaluation Instrument for Clinical Ethics Support (the Euro-MCD).Mia Svantesson, Jan Karlsson, Pierre Boitte, Jan Schildman, Linda Dauwerse, Guy Widdershoven, Reidar Pedersen, Martijn Huisman & Bert Molewijk - 2014 - BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):30.
    Clinical ethics support, in particular Moral Case Deliberation, aims to support health care providers to manage ethically difficult situations. However, there is a lack of evaluation instruments regarding outcomes of clinical ethics support in general and regarding Moral Case Deliberation (MCD) in particular. There also is a lack of clarity and consensuses regarding which MCD outcomes are beneficial. In addition, MCD outcomes might be context-sensitive. Against this background, there is a need for a standardised but flexible outcome evaluation instrument. The (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  2.  5
    It’s Not All About Moral Reasoning: Understanding the Content of Moral Case Deliberation.Mia Svantesson, Marit Silén & Inger James - 2018 - Nursing Ethics 25 (2):212-229.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3.  14
    ‘It’s Like Sailing’ – Experiences of the Role as Facilitator During Moral Case Deliberation.Dara Rasoal, Annica Kihlgren & Mia Svantesson - 2017 - Clinical Ethics 12 (3):135-142.
    BackgroundMoral case deliberation is one form of clinical ethics support, and there seems to be different ways of facilitating the dialogue.PurposeThis paper aimed to explore Swedish facilitators' experiences of their role in moral case deliberations.MethodThis study had a qualitative approach with explorative design. Semi-structured interviews with eleven MCD facilitators were conducted. Their experiences were analyzed using thematic analysis.ResultBeing a facilitator was understood through the metaphor of sailing: against the wind or with it. The role was likened to a sailor's set (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  4. What Outcomes Do Dutch Healthcare Professionals Perceive as Important Before Participation in Moral Case Deliberation?Janine de Snoo‐Trimp, Guy Widdershoven, Mia Svantesson, Riekie de Vet & Bert Molewijk - 2017 - Bioethics 31 (4):246-257.
    Background There has been little attention paid to research on the outcomes of clinical ethics support or critical reflection on what constitutes a good CES outcome. Understanding how CES users perceive the importance of CES outcomes can contribute to a better understanding, use of and normative reflection on CES outcomes. Objective To describe the perceptions of Dutch healthcare professionals on important outcomes of moral case deliberation, prior to MCD participation, and to compare results between respondents. Methods This mixed-methods study used (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  18
    Nurses' Conceptions of Decision Making Concerning Life-Sustaining Treatment.Marit Silén, Mia Svantesson & Gerd Ahlström - 2008 - Nursing Ethics 15 (2):160-173.
    The aim of this study was to describe nurses' conceptions of decision making with regard to life-sustaining treatment for dialysis patients. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 13 nurses caring for such patients at three hospitals. The interview material was subjected to qualitative content analysis. The nurses saw decision making as being characterized by uncertainty and by lack of communication and collaboration among all concerned. They described different ways of handling decision making, as well as insufficiency of physician—nurse collaboration, lack of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  6.  21
    Nurses' and Physicians' Opinions on Aggressiveness of Treatment for General Ward Patients.Mia Svantesson, Peter Sjökvist, Håkan Thorsén & Gerd Ahlström - 2006 - Nursing Ethics 13 (2):147-162.
    The aim of this study was to evaluate agreement between nurses’ and physicians’ opinions regarding aggressiveness of treatment and to investigate and compare the rationales on which their opinions were based. Structured interviews regarding 714 patients were performed on seven general wards of a university hospital. The data gathered were then subjected to qualitative and quantitative analyses. There was 86% agreement between nurses’ and physicians’ opinions regarding full or limited treatment when the answers given as ‘uncertain’ were excluded. Agreement was (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  7.  7
    Relational Autonomy in the Care of the Vulnerable: Health Care Professionals’ Reasoning in Moral Case Deliberation.Kaja Heidenreich, Anders Bremer, Lars Johan Materstvedt, Ulf Tidefelt & Mia Svantesson - forthcoming - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography