54 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Michael Bishop [33]Michael A. Bishop [20]Michael M. Bishop [1]
See also
Michael Bishop
Florida State University
Michael Bishop
University of Chicago
  1. Epistemology and the Psychology of Human Judgment.Michael A. Bishop & J. D. Trout - 2004 - New York: OUP USA.
    Bishop and Trout here present a unique and provocative new approach to epistemology. Their approach aims to liberate epistemology from the scholastic debates of standard analytic epistemology, and treat it as a branch of the philosophy of science. The approach is novel in its use of cost-benefit analysis to guide people facing real reasoning problems and in its framework for resolving normative disputes in psychology. Based on empirical data, Bishop and Trout show how people can improve their reasoning by relying (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   96 citations  
  2.  21
    The Good Life: Unifying the Philosophy and Psychology of Well-Being.Michael A. Bishop - 2015 - OUP USA.
    Science and philosophy study well-being with different but complementary methods. Marry these methods and a new picture emerges: To have well-being is to be "stuck" in a positive cycle of emotions, attitudes, traits and success. This book unites the scientific and philosophical worldviews into a powerful new theory of well-being.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  3. Why the Generality Problem is Everybody’s Problem.Michael A. Bishop - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 151 (2):285 - 298.
    The generality problem is widely considered to be a devastating objection to reliabilist theories of justification. My goal in this paper is to argue that a version of the generality problem applies to all plausible theories of justification. Assume that any plausible theory must allow for the possibility of reflective justification—S's belief, B, is justified on the basis of S's knowledge that she arrived at B as a result of a highly (but not perfectly) reliable way of reasoning, R. The (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  4. Ending the Rationality Wars: How to Make Disputes About Human Rationality Disappear.Richard Samuels, Stephen Stich & Michael Bishop - 2002 - In Renee Elio (ed.), Common Sense, Reasoning and Rationality. Oxford University Press. pp. 236-268.
    During the last 25 years, researchers studying human reasoning and judgment in what has become known as the “heuristics and biases” tradition have produced an impressive body of experimental work which many have seen as having “bleak implications” for the rationality of ordinary people (Nisbett and Borgida 1975). According to one proponent of this view, when we reason about probability we fall victim to “inevitable illusions” (Piattelli-Palmarini 1994). Other proponents maintain that the human mind is prone to “systematic deviations from (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   44 citations  
  5. Why Thought Experiments Are Not Arguments.Michael A. Bishop - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (4):534-541.
    Are thought experiments nothing but arguments? I argue that it is not possible to make sense of the historical trajectory of certain thought experiments if one takes them to be arguments. Einstein and Bohr disagreed about the outcome of the clock-in-the-box thought experiment, and so they reconstructed it using different arguments. This is to be expected whenever scientists disagree about a thought experiment's outcome. Since any such episode consists of two arguments but just one thought experiment, the thought experiment cannot (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   34 citations  
  6. In Praise of Epistemic Irresponsibility: How Lazy and Ignorant Can You Be?Michael A. Bishop - 2000 - Synthese 122 (1-2):179 - 208.
    Epistemic responsibility involves at least two central ideas. (V) To be epistemically responsible is to display the virtue(s) epistemic internalists take to be central to justification (e.g., coherence, having good reasons, fitting the evidence). (C) In normal (non-skeptical)circumstances and in thelong run, epistemic responsibility is strongly positively correlated with reliability. Sections 1 and 2 review evidence showing that for a wide range of real-world problems, the most reliable, tractable reasoning strategies audaciously flout the internalist''s epistemic virtues. In Section 3, I (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  7. The Pathologies of Standard Analytic Epistemology.Michael Bishop & J. D. Trout - 2005 - Noûs 39 (4):696-714.
    Standard Analytic Epistemology (SAE) names a contingently clustered class of methods and theses that have dominated English-speaking epistemology for about the past half-century. The major contemporary theories of SAE include versions of foundationalism, coherentism, reliabilism, and contextualism. While proponents of SAE don’t agree about how to define naturalized epistemology, most agree that a thoroughgoing naturalism in epistemology can’t work. For the purposes of this paper, we will suppose that a naturalistic theory of epistemology takes as its core, as its starting-point, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  8. The Flight to Reference, or How Not to Make Progress in the Philosophy of Science.Michael A. Bishop & Stephen P. Stich - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (1):33-49.
    The flight to reference is a widely-used strategy for resolving philosophical issues. The three steps in a flight to reference argument are: (1) offer a substantive account of the reference relation, (2) argue that a particular expression refers (or does not refer), and (3) draw a philosophical conclusion about something other than reference, like truth or ontology. It is our contention that whenever the flight to reference strategy is invoked, there is a crucial step that is left undefended, and that (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  9. 50 Years of Successful Predictive Modeling Should Be Enough: Lessons for Philosophy of Science.Michael Bishop & J. D. Trout - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (S3):S197-S208.
    Our aim in this paper is to bring the woefully neglected literature on predictive modeling to bear on some central questions in the philosophy of science. The lesson of this literature is straightforward: For a very wide range of prediction problems, statistical prediction rules (SPRs), often rules that are very easy to implement, make predictions than are as reliable as, and typically more reliable than, human experts. We will argue that the success of SPRs forces us to reconsider our views (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  10.  98
    The Possibility of Conceptual Clarity in Philosophy.Michael A. Bishop - 1992 - American Philosophical Quarterly 29 (3):267 - 277.
  11. An Epistemological Role for Thought Experiments.Michael Bishop - 1998 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 63:19-34.
    Why should a thought experiment, an experiment that only exists in people's minds, alter our fundamental beliefs about reality? After all, isn't reasoning from the imaginary to the real a sign of psychosis? A historical survey of how thought experiments have shaped our physical laws might lead one to believe that it's not the case that the laws of physics lie - it's that they don't even pretend to tell the truth. My aim in this paper is to defend an (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  12.  83
    The Pathologies of Standard Analytic Epistemology.Michael Bishop & J. D. Trout - 2005 - Noûs 39 (4):696–714.
  13. Reflections on Cognitive and Epistemic Diversity: Can a Stich in Time Save Quine?Michael Bishop - 2009 - In Dominic Murphy & Michael A. Bishop (eds.), Stich and His Critics. Wiley-Blackwell.
    In “Epistemology Naturalized” Quine famously suggests that epistemology, properly understood, “simply falls into place as a chapter of psychology and hence of natural science” (1969, 82). Since the appearance of Quine’s seminal article, virtually every epistemologist, including the later Quine (1986, 664), has repudiated the idea that a normative discipline like epistemology could be reduced to a purely descriptive discipline like psychology. Working epistemologists no longer take Quine’s vision in “Epistemology Naturalized” seriously. In this paper, I will explain why I (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  14.  16
    The Psychology of Intelligence Analysis: Drivers of Prediction Accuracy in World Politics.Barbara Mellers, Eric Stone, Pavel Atanasov, Nick Rohrbaugh, S. Emlen Metz, Lyle Ungar, Michael M. Bishop, Michael Horowitz, Ed Merkle & Philip Tetlock - 2015 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 21 (1):1-14.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  15.  66
    Stich and His Critics.Dominic Murphy & Michael Bishop (eds.) - 2009 - Wiley-Blackwell.
    Through a collection of original essays from leading philosophical scholars, _Stich and His Critics_ provides a thorough assessment of the key themes in the career of philosopher Stephen Stich. Provides a collection of original essays from some of the world's most distinguished philosophers Explores some of philosophy's most hotly-debated contemporary topics, including mental representation, theory of mind, nativism, moral philosophy, and naturalized epistemology.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  16. Fast and Frugal Heuristics.Michael A. Bishop - 2006 - Philosophy Compass 1 (2):201–223.
    A heuristic is a rule of thumb. In psychology, heuristics are relatively simple rules for making judgments. A fast heuristic is easy to use and allows one to make judgments quickly. A frugal heuristic relies on a small fraction of the available evidence in making judgments. Typically, fast and frugal heuristics (FFHs) have, or are claimed to have, a further property: They are very reliable, yielding judgments that are about as accurate in the long run as ideal non-fast, non-frugal rules. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  17. The Pessimistic Induction, the Flight to Reference and the Metaphysical Zoo.Michael A. Bishop - 2003 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (2):161 – 178.
    Scientific realism says of our best scientific theories that (1) most of their important posits exist and (2) most of their central claims are approximately true. Antirealists sometimes offer the pessimistic induction in reply: since (1) and (2) are false about past successful theories, they are probably false about our own best theories too. The contemporary debate about this argument has turned (and become stuck) on the question, Do the central terms of successful scientific theories refer? For example, Larry Laudan (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  18. Strategic Reliabilism: A Naturalistic Approach to Epistemology.Michael A. Bishop & J. D. Trout - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (5):1049-1065.
    Strategic Reliabilism is a framework that yields relative epistemic evaluations of belief-producing cognitive processes. It is a theory of cognitive excellence, or more colloquially, a theory of reasoning excellence (where 'reasoning' is understood very broadly as any sort of cognitive process for coming to judgments or beliefs). First introduced in our book, Epistemology and the Psychology of Human Judgment (henceforth EPHJ), the basic idea behind SR is that epistemically excellent reasoning is efficient reasoning that leads in a robustly reliable fashion (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  19. The Network Theory of Well-Being: An Introduction.Michael Bishop - 2012 - The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 7.
    In this paper, I propose a novel approach to investigating the nature of well-being and a new theory about wellbeing. The approach is integrative and naturalistic. It holds that a theory of well-being should account for two different classes of evidence—our commonsense judgments about well-being and the science of well-being (i.e., positive psychology). The network theory holds that a person is in the state of well-being if she instantiates a homeostatically clustered network of feelings, emotions, attitudes, behaviors, traits, and interactions (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  20. The Theory Theory Thrice Over: The Child as Scientist, Superscientist or Social Institution?Michael A. Bishop & Stephen M. Downes - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):117-132.
    Alison Gopnik and Andrew Meltzoff have argued for a view they call the ‘theory theory’: theory change in science and children are similar. While their version of the theory theory has been criticized for depending on a number of disputed claims, we argue that there is a fundamental problem which is much more basic: the theory theory is multiply ambiguous. We show that it might be claiming that a similarity holds between theory change in children and (i) individual scientists, (ii) (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  21. The Autonomy of Social Epistemology.Michael A. Bishop - 2005 - Episteme 2 (1):65-78.
    Social epistemology is autonomous: When applied to the same evidential situations, the principles of social rationality and the principles of individual rationality sometimes recommend inconsistent beliefs. If we stipulate that reasoning rationally from justified beliefs to a true belief is normally sufficient for knowledge, the autonomy thesis implies that some knowledge is essentially social. When the principles of social and individual rationality are applied to justified evidence and recommend inconsistent beliefs and the belief endorsed by social rationality is true, then (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  22. Introduction. [REVIEW]Dominic Murphy & Michael Bishop - 2009 - In Dominic Murphy & Michael A. Bishop (eds.), Stich and His Critics. Wiley-Blackwell.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  23.  30
    Diagnostic Prediction and Prognosis: Getting From Symptom to Treatment.Michael Bishop - 2013 - In Martin Davies K. W. M. Fulford (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Psychiatry. Oxford: pp. 1023-1046.
    This paper reviews the recent (post-DSM) history of subjective and semi-structured methods of psychiatric diagnosis, as well as evidence for the superiority of structured and computer-aided diagnostic techniques. While there is evidence that certain forms of therapy are effective for alleviating the psychiatric suffering, distress, and dysfunction associated with certain psychiatric disorders, this paper addresses some of the difficult methodological and ethical challenges of evaluating the effectiveness of therapy.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24. Theory-Ladenness of Perception Arguments.Michael A. Bishop - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:287 - 299.
    The theory-ladenness of perception argument is not an argument at all. It is two clusters of arguments. The first cluster is empirical. These arguments typically begin with a discussion of one or more of the following psychological phenomena: (a) the conceptual penetrability of the visual system, (b) voluntary perceptual reversal of ambiguous figures, (c) adaptation to distorting lenses, or (d) expectation effects. From this evidence, proponents of theory-ladenness typically conclude that perception is in some sense "laden" with theory. The second (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  25. Argumente für die naturaliste Erkenntnistheorie.Joshua Shepherd & Michael Bishop - 2015 - In Stefan Tolksdorf & Dirk Koppleberg (eds.), Erkenntnistheorie: Wie und Wozu? Mentis Publishers. pp. 245-274.
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  70
    WINO Epistemology and the Shifting-Sands Problem.Chris Zarpentine, Heather Cipolletti & Michael Bishop - 2012 - The Monist 95 (2):308-328.
    By making plausible the Diversity Thesis (different people have systematically different and incompatible packages of epistemic intuitions), experimental epistemology raises the specter of the shifting-sands problem: the evidence base for epistemology contains systematic inconsistencies. In response to this problem, some philosophers deny the Diversity Thesis, while others flirt with denying the Evidence Thesis (in normal circumstances, the epistemic intuition that p is prima facie evidence that p is true). We propose to accept both theses. The trick to living with the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  27.  45
    A Priori Knowledge of the Way the World Works: James Robert Brown: The Laboratory of the Mind: Thought Experiments in the Natural Sciences. [REVIEW]Michael Bishop - 2012 - Metascience 21 (3):687-691.
    A review of J.R. Brown's second edition of The Laboratory of the Mind: Thought Experiments in the Natural Sciences.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  28.  86
    Rationality: An Advanced Review.Clifford Sosis & Michael Bishop - 2013 - WIREs Cognitive Science.
    A theory of rationality is a theory that evaluates instances of reasoning as rational, irrational, or (ir)rational to some degree. Theories can be categorized as rule-based or consequentialist. Rule-based theories say that rational reasoning accords with certain rules (e.g., of logic or probability). Consequentialist theories say that rational reasoning tends to produce good consequences. For instance, the reliabilist takes rationality to be reasoning that tends to produce mostly true beliefs. The pragmatist takes it to be reasoning that tends to produce (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  20
    Editor's Introduction.Michael Bishop - 2012 - The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 7.
    Philosophers investigate the nature of morality. And scientists study the moral judgments people make, the moral norms people enforce, and the systems of moral rules people embrace. What is the relationship between these investigations? The traditional philosophical view is that an unbreachable wall divides these activities. Philosophy and science investigate entirely separate domains. Philosophy investigates the normative realm – the true nature of morality. Science investigates the descriptive realm – how different people or groups of people think about morality and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  30. Why the Semantic Incommensurability Thesis is Self-Defeating.Michael A. Bishop - 1991 - Philosophical Studies 63 (3):343 - 356.
    What factors are involved in the resolution of scientific disputes? What factors make the resolution of such disputes rational? The traditional view confers an important role on observation statements that are shared by proponents of competing theories. Rival theories make incompatible (sometimes contradictory) observational predictions about a particular situation, and the prediction made by one theory is borne out while the prediction made by the other is not. Paul Feyerabend, Thomas Kuhn, and Paul Churchland have called into question this account (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  32
    Reconstructing Reason and Representation.Michael Bishop - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):492-495.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  32.  63
    Goodbye, Justification. Hello World.Michael Bishop & Benett Bootz - 2007 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 7 (2):269-285.
    There are simple rules for making important judgments that are more reliable than experts, but people refuse to use them People refuse even when they are told that these rules are more reliable than they are. When we say that people “refuse” to use the rule, we do not mean that people stubbornly refuse to carry out the steps indicated by the rule. Rather, people defect from the rule (i.e., they overturn the rule’s judgment) so often that they end up (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33. Altérités d'André du Bouchet de Hugo, Shakespeare Et Poussin À Celan, Mandelstam Et Giacometti.Michael Bishop - 2003 - Rodopi.
    Reconnu depuis longtemps comme un des grands écrivains exemplaires de notre modernité, André du Bouchet nous lègue une oeuvre richement diversifiée, dense et transparente à la fois, transgénérique à bien des égards mais incontestablement poiétique dans sa conception et sa pratique. La présente étude cherche à privilégier les nombreux textes – essais, traductions, notes de carnet et autres accompagnements - où s'enlacent et s'entretissent une méditation critique profondément sentie, parfois obsessivement vécue, et une écriture poétique étonnamment originale visant à installer (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34. Naturalizing the Philosophy of Science.Michael A. Bishop - 1990 - Dissertation, University of California, San Diego
    Normative apriorist philosophers of science build purely normative a priori reconstructions of science, whereas descriptive naturalists eliminate the normative elements of the philosophy of science in favor of purely descriptive endeavors. I hope to exhibit the virtues of an alternative approach that appreciates both the normative and the natural in the philosophy of science. ;Theory ladenness. Some philosophers claim that a plausible view about how our visual systems work either undermines or facilitates our ability to rationally adjudicate between competing theories (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35. Simone de Beauvoir Et les Féminismes Contemporaines Essais, Témoignages, Inédits.Nicole Trèves & Michael Bishop - 1987 - Dalhousie French Studies.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  23
    Review of Rethinking Objectivity by Allan Megill. [REVIEW]Michael Bishop - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (1):145-146.
  37.  46
    What is This Thing Called Science? [REVIEW]Michael Bishop - 1996 - Teaching Philosophy 19 (2):204-206.
  38. Faculty.Michael Bishop - unknown
    J.D. Trout and I started this project in 2000. Our goal was to write a book that was interesting, opinionated, accessible, and fun to read. Here are some excerpts from the first two pages of chapter 1: Excerpts [pdf] . The cover photo is a still of the great Buster Keaton from his movie, The General.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  39
    Biology, Ethics, and the Origins of Life. [REVIEW]Michael Bishop - 1996 - Teaching Philosophy 19 (3):302-304.
  40.  10
    Tychomancy: Inferring Probability From Causal Structure, by Michael Strevens: Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013, Pp. Xiv + 265, US$39.95. [REVIEW]Michael Bishop - 2014 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (4):808-811.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  21
    Which Rights Should Be Universal? [REVIEW]Michael A. Bishop - 2006 - Review of Metaphysics 59 (3):683-685.
    Basic human rights are “necessary for a government to be relied upon to make itself more just over time”. Ultimately, Talbott grounds basic human rights in our “capacity for autonomy”. While he is prepared to grant that autonomy may be intrinsically valuable, his primary focus is showing how societies that protect autonomy by respecting basic human rights better promote their citizens’ well-being.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  21
    Existential Cognition: Computational Minds in the World. [REVIEW]Michael A. Bishop - 1997 - International Studies in Philosophy 29 (4):130-131.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  32
    Editors' Note. [REVIEW]Michael Bishop, Richard Samuels & Stephen Stich - 2000 - Synthese 122 (1-2):1-1.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  23
    Appearance in This List Neither Guarantees nor Precludes a Future Review of the Book. Agamben, Giorgio, Trans. Kevin Attell, State of Exception, London and Chicago: Univer-Sity of Chicago Press, 2005, Pp. Vii+ 95,£ 8.50, $12.00. Aiken, William and John Haldane (Eds), Philosophy and Its Public Role, Exeter, UK and Charlottesville, VA: Imprint Academic, 2004, Pp. Vi+ 272,£ 14.95, $29.90. [REVIEW]Michael A. Bishop, J. D. Trout, L. Johannes Brandl, Marian David, Leopold Stubenberg, Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore - 2005 - Mind 114:454.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  45.  13
    From Album d'Images de la Villa Harris.Emmanuel Hocquard & Michael Bishop - 1979 - Substance 8 (2/3):105.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  13
    Poems.Charles Racine & Michael Bishop - 1979 - Substance 8 (2/3):97.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  51
    Semantic Flexibility in Scientific Practice: A Study of Newton's Optics.Michael Bishop - 1999 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 32 (3):210 - 232.
    Semantic essentialism holds that any scientific term that appears in a well-confirmed scientific theory has a fixed kernel of meaning. Semantic essentialism cannot make sense of the strategies scientists use to argue for their views. Newton's central optical expression "light ray" suggests a context-sensitive view of scientific language. On different occasions, Newton's expression could refer to different things depending on his particular argumentative goals - a visible beam, an irreducibly smallest section of propagating light, or a traveling particle of light. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  48.  15
    Notice Critique : Reconstructing Reason and Representation — Murray Clarke. [REVIEW]Michael Bishop - 2007 - Philosophiques 34 (2):367-374.
  49.  11
    Bernard Noel.Michael Bishop - 1979 - Substance 8 (2/3):157.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  14
    Commentary on The Possibility of an Evolutionary Semantics : The Nature and Evolution of Human Language. [REVIEW]Michael Bishop - 1992 - Between the Species 8 (2):10.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 54