71 found
Order:
  1. Demonstrative Identification and Descriptive Identification.Michael Durrant - 1988 - Philosophical Quarterly 38 (151):213-221.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Numerical Identity.Michael Durrant - 1973 - Mind 82 (325):95-103.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. The Irreducibility of `Meaning'.Robin Attfield & Michael Durrant - 1973 - Noûs 7 (3):282-298.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  63
    Austin on Whether Every Proposition Has a Contradictory.Charles Sayward & Michael Durrant - 1967 - Analysis 27 (5):167 - 170.
  5.  57
    Feature Universals and Sortal Universals.Michael Durrant - 1970 - Analysis 31 (2):49 - 52.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  75
    Austin On Whether Every Proposition Has A Contradictory.Michael Durrant & Charles Sayward - 1967 - Analysis 27 (April):167-170.
    Austin rejects the contention that every proposition has a contradictory. This paper finds problems with the case Austin makes for rejecting the contention in question.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Sortals and the Subject-Predicate Distinction.Michael Durrant & Stephen Horton - 2001
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  20
    Modes of Existence.Michael Durrant - 1999 - Cogito 13 (3):177-179.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  7
    Religion as the Inexpressible Some Logical Difficulties.Michael Durrant - 1965 - Sophia 4 (2):14-21.
  10.  8
    General Terms and Logical Subjects.Michael Durrant - 1974 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3 (4):525 - 538.
    I subscribe to and defend frege's view that concepts are essentially predicative such that they can never occur as subjects of predication, Arguing against recent contentions of geach and strawson to the effect that (a) some general terms can so occur; (b) that 'anything whatever' can be a subject of predication. I discuss in detail frege's treatment of universally quantified propositions, Particular propositions, And unquantified propositions arguing that his thesis can be defended in each type of case.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. The Logical Status of `God'.Michael Durrant, Kai Nielsen & Ninian Smart - 1975 - Mind 84 (333):154-156.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  12.  5
    Cumulative Arguments in Theology.Michael Durrant - 1976 - Sophia 15 (3):1-6.
  13.  21
    On the Thesis That a Name has Sense Only in the Context of a Proposition: A Problem.Michael Durrant - 1993 - Cogito 7 (1):47-49.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  22
    Scepticism: Three Recently Presented Arguments Examined.Michael Durrant - 1991 - Philosophical Investigations 14 (3):252-266.
  15.  31
    Essence and Accident.Michael Durrant - 1975 - Mind 84 (336):595-600.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  24
    On Moore's Refutation of Esse is Percipi.Michael Durrant - 2000 - Philosophical Investigations 23 (1):26–47.
  17.  8
    The Meaning of 'God'—I.Michael Durrant - 1992 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 31:71-84.
    In this paper I shall be examining the following claims: that ‘God’ has no meaning, in the sense of ‘sense’; that it is a proper name analogous to a Russellian proper name in that it has reference only. More crudely, that we cannot describe God in any way but only name Him and refer to Him by name; that ‘God’ has no meaning, in the sense of ‘sense’ in that the nature of God is fundamentally inexpressible. That God is, as (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  8
    Transcendence, Instantiation and Incarnation: An Exploration.Michael Durrant - 1993 - Religious Studies 29 (3):337 - 352.
    This paper is exploratory. It raises the questions: 1) How is it possible that that which is of its "nature" transcendent should become immanent or incarnate?; 2) How is it possible for one and the same individual to be both "fully" God and "fully" man? As concerns 1) an answer is offered by appeal to Geach’s account of Aquinas’s doctrine of "Form"; as concerns 2) a sketch answer is supplied on the basis of 1) It is held that a paradox (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  16
    Meinwald's Pros Heauto Analysis of Plato's Apparently Self-Predicational Sentences.Michael Durrant - 1997 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 (3):383 – 395.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  7
    Anthony Kenny. The Five Ways: St Thomas Aquinas' Proofs of God's Existence. Pp. 120. [REVIEW]Michael Durrant - 1971 - Religious Studies 7 (2):187.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  1
    The Meaning of ‘God’—I: Michael Durrant.Michael Durrant - 1992 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 31:71-84.
    In this paper I shall be examining the following claims: that ‘God’ has no meaning, in the sense of ‘sense’; that it is a proper name analogous to a Russellian proper name in that it has reference only. More crudely, that we cannot describe God in any way but only name Him and refer to Him by name; that ‘God’ has no meaning, in the sense of ‘sense’ in that the nature of God is fundamentally inexpressible. That God is, as (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  16
    Responsibility and Atonement.Michael Durrant - 1990 - Philosophical Books 31 (3):190-192.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  1
    Penelhum on Persons as ‘Gap-Inclusive’ Entities.Michael Durrant - 1974 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 12 (4):513-518.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  1
    Plato, the ‘Third Man’ and the Nature of the Forms.Michael Durrant - 1979 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 17 (3):287-304.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  15
    Plato, the 'Third Man' and the Nature of the Forms.Michael Durrant - 1979 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 17 (3):287-304.
  26.  6
    Freedom and Resentment, and Other Essays.Michael Durrant - 1975 - Philosophical Books 16 (1):28-32.
  27.  14
    Plato's Quinean Beard: Did Plato Ever Grow It?Michael Durrant - 1998 - Philosophy 73 (1):113-121.
    Quine may be taken to use the phrase ‘Plato's Beard’ to denote a solution to the following problem: How is it possible to speak of that which does not exist, of non-being or as Read has it, to denote a solution to the problem: ‘How can a sentence with empty names have meaning?’. Quine writes: Nonbeing must in some sense be, otherwise what is that there is not? This tangled doctrine might be nicknamed Plato's beard; historically it has proved tough, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  3
    Transcendence, Instantiation and Incarnation–an Exploration: Michael Durrant.Michael Durrant - 1993 - Religious Studies 29 (3):337-352.
    This paper is exploratory. I shall raise the following questions: How is it possible that that which is of its nature transcendent should become immanent or incarnate? In the context of Christian Theology: how is it possible for God to become man? How is it possible for one and the same individual, Jesus of Nazareth, to be both fully God and fully man? In relation to I shall attempt to give an account of how it is so possible for the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  8
    The Logic of God Incarnate: Two Recent Metaphysical Principles Examined.Michael Durrant - 1988 - Religious Studies 24 (2):121 - 127.
    THE PURPOSE OF THE PAPER IS TO CRITICALLY EXAMINE TWO METAPHYSICAL PRINCIPLES ADVOCATED BY PROFESSOR MORRIS IN HIS BOOK "THE LOGIC OF GOD INCARNATE", NAMELY (I) THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN "COMMON" HUMAN PROPERTIES AND "ESSENTIAL" HUMAN PROPERTIES; (II) THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN BEING "MERELY" X AND "FULLY" X. THE FIRST DISTINCTION IS BOTH DEFENDED AND EXPANDED ON; THE SECOND IS REJECTED ON THE GROUNDS THAT IT INVOKES AN IMPOSSIBLE COMPARISON; A COMPARISON BETWEEN A QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT ON THE ONE HAND AND THE QUALITATIVE (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  12
    Professor Zink on "the Meaning of Proper Names".Michael Durrant - 1969 - Mind 78 (312):571-575.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  4
    Religion, Truth and Language Games.Michael Durrant - 1978 - Philosophical Books 19 (2):72-75.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  4
    Reference and Critical Realism.Michael Durrant - 1989 - Modern Theology 5 (2):133-143.
  33.  4
    The Justification of Religious Belief.Michael Durrant - 1974 - Religious Studies 10 (2):233.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  2
    The Logic of God Incarnate–Two Recent Metaphysical Principles Examined: Michael Durrant.Michael Durrant - 1988 - Religious Studies 24 (2):121-127.
    In his recent work Professor Morris writes: ‘I am suggesting that, armed with a couple of fairly simple metaphysical distinctions we can begin to see how the doctrine of the Incarnation can possibly be true.’ What are these ‘metaphysical distinctions’ and do they stand up to critical examination? My answer to the latter part of this question in regard to the first distinction is a reserved ‘Yes’; in regard to the second distinction a definite ‘No’. If my criticism of the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  2
    William Lane Craig. The Cosmological Argument From Plato to Leibniz. . Pp. 295. £15.00. [REVIEW]Michael Durrant - 1981 - Religious Studies 17 (2):289.
  36.  2
    Janet Martin Soskice. Metaphor and Religious Language. Pp. 180.Michael Durrant - 1987 - Religious Studies 23 (2):297.
  37.  3
    God and Analogy.Michael Durrant - 1969 - Sophia 8 (3):11-24.
  38.  3
    St. Thomas' 'Third Way'.Michael Durrant - 1969 - Religious Studies 4 (2):229 - 243.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  3
    Kai Neilsen. Contemporary Critiques of Religion. Pp. 163. [REVIEW]Michael Durrant - 1972 - Religious Studies 8 (3):272.
  40.  2
    Discourse and its Presuppositions.Michael Durrant - 1973 - Philosophical Books 14 (2):12-15.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  3
    PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION What is God?: The Selected Essays of Richard R. La Croix.Michael Durrant - 1994 - Philosophical Books 35 (4):281-283.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  6
    Parmenides 127 E—130 E.Michael Durrant - 1975 - Philosophical Papers 4 (2):105-115.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  2
    John Hick. Arguments for the Existence of God. Pp. 148. £2·50. [REVIEW]Michael Durrant - 1972 - Religious Studies 8 (2):183.
  44.  3
    Aristotle's Two Systems.Michael Durrant - 1989 - Philosophical Books 30 (1):16-19.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  4
    Penelhum on Persons as 'Gap-Inclusive' Entities.Michael Durrant - 1974 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 12 (4):513-518.
  46.  1
    “Religion as the Inexpressible” —Some Logical Difficulties.Michael Durrant - 1965 - Sophia 4 (2):3-9.
  47.  4
    Review: The Justification of Religious Belief. [REVIEW]Michael Durrant - 1974 - Religious Studies 10 (2):233 - 236.
  48.  2
    Keith Ward. The Concept of God. Pp. 232.Michael Durrant - 1975 - Religious Studies 11 (4):490.
  49.  2
    Terence Penelhum. Problems of Religious Knowledge. Pp. 186.Michael Durrant - 1972 - Religious Studies 8 (3):274.
  50.  3
    Prescriptivity and Justification.Michael Durrant & Robin Attfield - 1981 - Philosophical Papers 10 (1):16-23.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 71