47 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Michael Pendlebury [36]Michael J. Pendlebury [11]Michael John Pendlebury [2]
See also
Profile: Michael Pendlebury (North Carolina State University)
  1. The Role of Imagination in Perception.Michael J. Pendlebury - 1996 - South African Journal of Philosophy 15 (4):133-138.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2. Facts and Truth-Making.Michael Pendlebury - 2010 - Topoi 29 (2):137-145.
    This essay is a reflection on the idea of truth-making and its applications. I respond to a critique of my 1986 paper on truth-making and discuss some key principles at play in the Truth-maker Program as it has emerged over the past 25 years, paying special attention to negative and general truths. I maintain my opposition to negative and general facts, but give an improved account of how to do without them. In the end, I accept Truth-maker Maximalism and a (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  3. Making Sense of Kant's Schematism.Michael Pendlebury - 1995 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (4):777-797.
  4.  33
    Objective Reasons.Michael Pendlebury - 2007 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (4):533-563.
    In order to establish that judgments about practical reasons can be objective, it is necessary to show that the applicable standards provide an adequate account of truth and error. This in turn requires that these standards yield an extensive set of substantive, publicly accessible judgments that are presumptively true. This output requirement is not satisfied by the standards of universalizability, consistency, coherence, and caution alone. But it is satisfied if we supplement them with the principle that desire is a source (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  5.  69
    How to Be a Normative Expressivist.Michael Pendlebury - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (1):182-207.
    Abstract. Expressivism can make space for normative objectivity by treating normative stances as pro or con attitudes that can be correct or incorrect. And it can answer the logical challenges that bedevil it by treating a simple normative assertion not merely as an expression of a normative stance, but as an expression of the endorsement of a proposition that is true if and only if that normative stance is correct. Although this position has superficial similarities to normative realism, it does (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  6.  62
    Facts as Truthmakers.Michael Pendlebury - 1986 - The Monist 69 (2):177-188.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  7.  9
    The Projection Strategy and the Truth Conditions of Conditional Statements.Michael Pendlebury - 1989 - Mind 98 (390):179-205.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  8.  26
    Global Justice and the Specter of Leviathan.Michael Pendlebury - 2007 - Philosophical Forum 38 (1):43–56.
  9.  19
    Against the Power of Force: Reflections on the Meaning of Mood.Michael Pendlebury - 1986 - Mind 95 (379):361-372.
  10.  11
    Intentionality and Normativity.Michael J. Pendlebury - 1998 - South African Journal of Philosophy 17 (2):142-151.
  11.  15
    Indexical Reference and the Ontology of Belief.Michael J. Pendlebury - 1982 - South African Journal of Philosophy 1:65-74.
  12.  24
    Sense Experiences and Their Contents: A Defense of the Propositional Account.Michael J. Pendlebury - 1990 - Inquiry 33 (2):215-30.
    A number of philosophers are committed to the view that sense experiences, in so far as they have contents, have propositional contents, but this is more often tacitly accepted than argued for in the literature. This paper explains the propositional account and presents a basic case in support of it in a simple and straightforward way which does not involve commitment to any specific philosophical theory of perception.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  13.  46
    Content and Causation in Perception.Michael J. Pendlebury - 1994 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (4):767-785.
  14.  60
    Capitalist Exploitation, Self-Ownership, and Equality.Michael Pendlebury, Peter Hudson & Darrel Moellendorf - 2001 - Philosophical Forum 32 (3):207–220.
    Traditional Marxists hold that capitalist modes of production are unjustly exploitative. In 'Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality' G. A. Cohen argues that this ``exploitation charge'' commits traditional Marxists to the thesis that people own themselves (``self-ownership''). If so, then traditional Marxism is vulnerable to a libertarian challenge to its commitment to equality. Cohen, therefore, recommends that Marxists abandon the exploitation charge. This paper undermines Cohen's case for the alleged link between the exploitation charge and self-ownership primarily by defending an account of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  35
    Individual Autonomy and Global Democracy.Michael Pendlebury - 2004 - Theoria 51 (103):43-58.
  16.  19
    Thought and Language.Michael J. Pendlebury - 2002 - South African Journal of Philosophy 21 (3):200-218.
    This article defends the view that nonlinguistic animals could be capable of thought (in the sense in which the mere possession of beliefs and desires is sufficient for thought). It is easy to identify flaws in Davidson's arguments for the thesis that thought depends upon language if one is open to the idea that some nonlinguistic animals have beliefs. It is, however, necessary to do more than this if one wishes to engage with the deeper challenge underlying Davidson's reasoning, viz., (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17.  11
    Hob, Nob, and Hecate: The Problem of Quantifying Out.Michael Pendlebury - 1982 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 60 (4):346 – 354.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  18.  20
    Stalnaker on Inquiry. [REVIEW]Michael Pendlebury - 1987 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 16 (3):229-272.
  19.  12
    "Ought" Judgments and Motivation.Michael Pendlebury - 2002 - American Philosophical Quarterly 39 (2):183 - 196.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20.  17
    How Demonstratives Denote.Michael Pendlebury - 1984 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 22 (1):91-104.
  21.  9
    Perceptual Representation.Michael J. Pendlebury - 1986 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 87:91-106.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  22.  23
    Sensibility and Understanding in Perceptual Judgments.Michael J. Pendlebury - 1999 - South African Journal of Philosophy 18 (4):356-369.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  29
    Toward Global Democracy.Michael Pendlebury - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 13:91-99.
  24.  10
    Against the Careerist Conception of Well-Being.Michael Pendlebury - 2000 - Philosophical Forum 31 (1):1–10.
  25.  45
    Opacity and Self-Consciousness.Michael J. Pendlebury - 2002 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 40 (2):243-251.
  26.  1
    Content and Causation in Perception.Michael Pendlebury - 1994 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (4):767-785.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  34
    On the Semantics of Simple and Complex Demonstratives in English.Michael Pendlebury - 2001 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 39 (4):487-505.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  38
    Why Proper Names Are Rigid Designators.Michael Pendlebury - 1990 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (3):519-536.
  29.  2
    Hetherington on Possible Objects.Michael Pendlebury - 1985 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 63 (4):494 – 495.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30.  7
    Russellian Thoughts.Michael Pendlebury - 1988 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48 (4):669-682.
  31.  24
    Objectivism Versus Realism.Michael Pendlebury - 2011 - Philosophical Forum 42 (1):79-104.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  21
    Elementary Formal Semantics for English Tense and Aspect.Michael Pendlebury - 1992 - Philosophical Papers 21 (3):215-241.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  18
    Perception and Objective Knowledge.Michael J. Pendlebury - 2000 - In The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy. Charlottesville: Philosophy Documentation Center. pp. 29-38.
    McDowell and Putnam are right to insist that objective knowledge is possible only because we are open to the world in perception, but neither of them offers an adequate account of the relationship between perception and perceptual judgments (which are at the core of our most fundamental knowledge of the world). This paper, intended as a contribution to the development of a sophisticated commonsense realism, proposes an account in terms of which perceptions acquire the status of perceptual judgments to the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  9
    Reasons in Action.Michael Pendlebury - 2013 - Philosophical Papers 42 (3):341 - 368.
    When an agent performs an action because she takes something as a reason to do so, does she take it as a normative reason for the action or as an explanatory reason? In Reasons Without Rationalism, Setiya criticizes the normative view and advances a version of the explanatory view. I defend a version of the normative view against Setiya's criticisms and show that Setiya's explanatory account has two major flaws: it raises questions that it cannot answer about the occurrence of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  17
    Belief, Propositional Quantification, and the Liar.Michael Pendlebury - 1985 - Philosophia 15 (1-2):123-132.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  15
    In Defense of Moderate Neutralism.Michael Pendlebury - 2002 - Journal of Social Philosophy 33 (3):360–376.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  1
    VI—Perceptual Representation.Michael Pendlebury - 1987 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 87 (1):91-106.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  3
    MILLER, Seumas Joint Action.Kai Nielsen, Michael Pendlebury, Philip Percival, Mark Sainsbury, David Sapire, Charles Sayward, Philip Hugly, Mark Timmons & Terence Horgan - 1992 - Philosophical Papers 1 (259):65.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  6
    Review: Stalnaker on Inquiry. [REVIEW]Michael Pendlebury - 1987 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 16 (3):229 - 272.
  40.  7
    Heidelberger on the First and Second Person.Michael Pendlebury - 1985 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46 (2):323-331.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  1
    Zemach on Belief.Michael Pendlebury - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):427 – 433.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. How Demonstratives Denote.Michael Pendlebury - 1984 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 22 (1):91-104.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. How to Be a Normative Expressivist.Michael Pendlebury - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (1):182-207.
    Expressivism can make space for normative objectivity by treating normative stances as pro or con attitudes that can be correct or incorrect. And it can answer the logical challenges that bedevil it by treating a simple normative assertion not merely as an expression of a normative stance, but as an expression of the endorsement of a proposition that is true if and only if that normative stance is correct. Although this position has superficial similarities to normative realism, it does full (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Individual Autonomy and Global Democracy.Michael Pendlebury - 2004 - Theoria 51:43-58.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Opacity and Self-Consciousness.Michael Pendlebury - 2002 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 40 (2):243-251.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Toward Global Democracy.Michael Pendlebury - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 13:91-99.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, Volume 5: Epistemology.Michael J. Pendlebury - 2000 - Charlottesville: Philosophy Documentation Center.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography